A real-time data/ML platform builder builds a tool to help teams find out what's wrong with an attribute. The tool is serverless, low-maintenance, and queries terabytesA real-time data/ML platform builder builds a tool to help teams find out what's wrong with an attribute. The tool is serverless, low-maintenance, and queries terabytes

Inside a Low-Cost, Serverless Data Lineage System Built on AWS

2025/12/15 18:18

Problem Statement

I build and operate real-time data/ML platforms, and one recurring pain I see inside any data org is this: “Why does this attribute have this value?” When a company name, industry, or revenue looks wrong, investigations often stall without engineering help. I wanted a way for analysts, support, and product folks to self-serve the “why,” with history and evidence, without waking up an engineer.

This is the blueprint I shipped: A serverless, low‑maintenance traceability service that queries terabytes in seconds and costs peanuts.

What this tool needed to do (for non‑engineers)

  • Explain a value: Why does attribute X for company Y equal Z right now?
  • Show the history: When did it change? What were the past versions?
  • Show evidence: Which sources and rules produced that value?
  • Be self‑serve: An API + simple UI so teams can investigate without engineers

The architecture (serverless on purpose)

  • Amazon API Gateway: a secure front door for the API

  • AWS Lambda: stateless request handlers (no idle compute to pay for)

  • Amazon S3 + Apache Hudi: cheap storage with time travel and upserts

  • AWS Glue Data Catalog: schema and partition metadata

  • Amazon Athena: SQL over S3/Hudi, pay-per-data‑scanned, zero infra

\

Why these choices?

  • Cost: storage on S3 is cheap; Athena charges only for bytes scanned; Lambda is pay‑per‑invocation
  • Scale: S3/Hudi trivially supports TB→PB, and Athena scales horizontally
  • Maintenance: no fleet to patch; infra footprint stays tiny as usage grows

:::info Data layout: performance is a data problem (not a compute problem) Athena is fast when it reads almost nothing, and slow when it plans or scans too much. The entire project hinged on getting partitions and projection right.

:::

Partitioning strategy (based on query patterns)

  • created_date (date): most queries are time‑bounded
  • attributename (enum): employees, revenue, linkedinurl, founded_year, industry, etc.
  • entityidmod (integer bucket): mod(entity_id, N) to spread hot keys evenly

This limits data scanned and, more importantly, narrows what partition metadata Athena needs to consider.

The three things that made it fast:

  1. Partitioning:

  2. Put only frequently filtered columns in the partition spec.

  3. Use integer bucketing (mod) for high‑cardinality keys like entity_id.

    \

  4. Partition Indexing (first win, partial):

  5. We enabled partition indexing so Athena could prune partition metadata faster during planning.

  6. This helped until the partition count grew large; planning was still the dominant cost.

    \

  7. Partition Projection (the actual game‑changer):

  8. Instead of asking Glue to store millions of partitions, we taught Athena how partitions are shaped.

  9. Result: planning time close to zero; queries jumped from “slow-ish with growth” to consistently 1–2 seconds for typical workloads.

\ Athena TBLPROPERTIES (minimal example)

TBLPROPERTIES ( 'projection.enabled'='true', 'projection.attribute_name.type'='enum', 'projection.attribute_name.values'='employees,revenue,linkedin_url,founded_year,industry', 'projection.entity_id_mod.type'='integer', 'projection.entity_id_mod.interval'='1', 'projection.entity_id_mod.range'='0,9', 'projection.created_date.type'='date', 'projection.created_date.format'='yyyy-MM-dd', 'projection.created_date.interval'='1', 'projection.created_date.interval.unit'='days', 'projection.created_date.range'='2022-01-01,NOW' )

\

Why this works

  • Athena no longer fetches a huge partition list from Glue; it calculates partitions on the fly from the rules above
  • Scanning drops to “only the files that match the constraints”
  • Planning time becomes negligible, even as data and partitions grow

\

What surprised me (and what was hard)

  • The “gotcha” was query planning, not compute. We often optimize engines, but here the slowest part was enumerating partitions. Partition projection solved the right problem.
  • Picking partition keys is half art, half science. Over-partition and you drown in metadata; under-partition and you pay per scan. Start from your top 3 query predicates and work backwards.
  • Enum partitions are underrated. For low‑cardinality domains (attribute_name), enum projection is both simple and fast.
  • Bucketing (via mod) is pragmatic. True bucketing support is limited in Athena, but a mod-based integer partition gets you most of the benefits.

\

Cost & latency (real numbers)

  • Typical queries: 1–2 seconds end‑to‑end (Lambda cold starts excluded)
  • Data size: multiple TB in S3/Hudi
  • Cost: pennies per 100s of requests (Athena scan + Lambda invocations)
  • Ops: near‑zero—no servers, no manual compaction beyond Hudi maintenance cadence

\

Common pitfalls (so you can skip them)

  • Don’t partition by high‑cardinality fields directly (e.g., raw entity_id); you’ll explode the partition count
  • Don’t skip projection if you expect partitions to grow; indexing alone won’t save you
  • Don’t save partition metadata for every key if a rule can generate it (projection exists exactly for that reason)
  • Don’t leave Glue schemas to drift; version them and validate in CI

\

Try this at home (a minimal checklist)

  • Model your top 3 queries; pick partitions that match those predicates

  • Use enum projection for low‑cardinality fields; date projection for time; integer ranges for buckets

  • Store data in columnar formats (Parquet/ORC) via Hudi to keep scans small and enable time travel

  • Add a thin API (API Gateway + Lambda) to turn traceability SQL into JSON for your UI

  • Measure planning vs. scan time; optimize the former first

    \

What this unlocked for my users

  • Analysts and support can answer “why” without engineers
  • Product can audit attribute changes by time and cause
  • Engineering spends more time on fixes and less time on forensics
  • The org trusts the data more because the evidence is one click away

\

Closing thought

Great performance is usually a data layout story. Before you scale compute, fix how you store and find bytes. In serverless analytics, the fastest query is the one that plans instantly and reads almost nothing, and partition projection is the lever that gets you there.

Piyasa Fırsatı
RealLink Logosu
RealLink Fiyatı(REAL)
$0.07305
$0.07305$0.07305
-0.67%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

De markt voor crypto-exchange-traded funds (ETF’s) heeft opnieuw een belangrijke mijlpaal bereikt. XRP ETF’s hebben gezamenlijk meer dan 1 miljard dollar aan netto
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/12/16 21:01
XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025

XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025

The post XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. StraitsX Stablecoins Unleash Power: XSGD And XUSD Launch
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:59