The post BTC $115K / ETH $4.2K — CTK Presale vs L1s — Which Offers Higher Convexity? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News Bitcoin trading near $115,000 and Ethereum around $4,200 creates a familiar market dynamic: BTC provides the macro liquidity runway, ETH supplies the programmable rails. With those two anchors relatively stable, investors hunt for asymmetric opportunities — the so-called convexity trades that can deliver large upside from modest capital. This article compares CTK (ConstructKoin) presale exposure to core L1 holdings (BTC/ETH) and explains why a disciplined ReFi presale can offer higher convexity — if and only if execution, compliance, and verifiable pilots line up. Founder Chris Chourio’s roadmap is central to that argument. What we mean by convexity here Convexity in crypto terms = asymmetric upside potential relative to downside risk. Blue-chip L1s (BTC, ETH) offer lower downside volatility and steady upside tied to macro and network adoption. Presale tokens like CTK are higher risk but can produce substantially larger percentage returns if the project (1) proves product-market fit, (2) lands institutional partners, and (3) executes milestones reliably. BTC & ETH — the baseline Bitcoin: macro liquidity magnet. When BTC rallies, it enlarges the market’s risk budget. BTC is the slow-but-steady backbone many institutions allocate to first. Ethereum: the developer and settlement hub. ETH’s strength improves the utility and tool-chains (oracles, L2s) that presales use to prove off-chain events on-chain. Holding BTC/ETH is a defensive growth posture. Allocators usually allocate a small “opportunity” bucket for higher-convexity bets — that’s where presales live. CTK presale: why it’s structured for institutional convexity ConstructKoin (CTK) is designed as a presale for ReFi infrastructure, not a speculative memetoken. Key features that create asymmetric upside potential: Milestone-driven funding (phased presale): CTK’s multi-phase presale releases capital against verifiable product and pilot milestones — reducing the “one-shot” dilution risk and aligning price discovery with execution. Real-world revenue pathway: CTK funds property-development finance flows, creating potential repeatable… The post BTC $115K / ETH $4.2K — CTK Presale vs L1s — Which Offers Higher Convexity? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News Bitcoin trading near $115,000 and Ethereum around $4,200 creates a familiar market dynamic: BTC provides the macro liquidity runway, ETH supplies the programmable rails. With those two anchors relatively stable, investors hunt for asymmetric opportunities — the so-called convexity trades that can deliver large upside from modest capital. This article compares CTK (ConstructKoin) presale exposure to core L1 holdings (BTC/ETH) and explains why a disciplined ReFi presale can offer higher convexity — if and only if execution, compliance, and verifiable pilots line up. Founder Chris Chourio’s roadmap is central to that argument. What we mean by convexity here Convexity in crypto terms = asymmetric upside potential relative to downside risk. Blue-chip L1s (BTC, ETH) offer lower downside volatility and steady upside tied to macro and network adoption. Presale tokens like CTK are higher risk but can produce substantially larger percentage returns if the project (1) proves product-market fit, (2) lands institutional partners, and (3) executes milestones reliably. BTC & ETH — the baseline Bitcoin: macro liquidity magnet. When BTC rallies, it enlarges the market’s risk budget. BTC is the slow-but-steady backbone many institutions allocate to first. Ethereum: the developer and settlement hub. ETH’s strength improves the utility and tool-chains (oracles, L2s) that presales use to prove off-chain events on-chain. Holding BTC/ETH is a defensive growth posture. Allocators usually allocate a small “opportunity” bucket for higher-convexity bets — that’s where presales live. CTK presale: why it’s structured for institutional convexity ConstructKoin (CTK) is designed as a presale for ReFi infrastructure, not a speculative memetoken. Key features that create asymmetric upside potential: Milestone-driven funding (phased presale): CTK’s multi-phase presale releases capital against verifiable product and pilot milestones — reducing the “one-shot” dilution risk and aligning price discovery with execution. Real-world revenue pathway: CTK funds property-development finance flows, creating potential repeatable…

BTC $115K / ETH $4.2K — CTK Presale vs L1s — Which Offers Higher Convexity?

2025/10/29 19:09
Crypto News

Bitcoin trading near $115,000 and Ethereum around $4,200 creates a familiar market dynamic: BTC provides the macro liquidity runway, ETH supplies the programmable rails.

With those two anchors relatively stable, investors hunt for asymmetric opportunities — the so-called convexity trades that can deliver large upside from modest capital. This article compares CTK (ConstructKoin) presale exposure to core L1 holdings (BTC/ETH) and explains why a disciplined ReFi presale can offer higher convexity — if and only if execution, compliance, and verifiable pilots line up. Founder Chris Chourio’s roadmap is central to that argument.

What we mean by convexity here

Convexity in crypto terms = asymmetric upside potential relative to downside risk. Blue-chip L1s (BTC, ETH) offer lower downside volatility and steady upside tied to macro and network adoption. Presale tokens like CTK are higher risk but can produce substantially larger percentage returns if the project (1) proves product-market fit, (2) lands institutional partners, and (3) executes milestones reliably.

BTC & ETH — the baseline

  • Bitcoin: macro liquidity magnet. When BTC rallies, it enlarges the market’s risk budget. BTC is the slow-but-steady backbone many institutions allocate to first.
  • Ethereum: the developer and settlement hub. ETH’s strength improves the utility and tool-chains (oracles, L2s) that presales use to prove off-chain events on-chain.

Holding BTC/ETH is a defensive growth posture. Allocators usually allocate a small “opportunity” bucket for higher-convexity bets — that’s where presales live.

CTK presale: why it’s structured for institutional convexity

ConstructKoin (CTK) is designed as a presale for ReFi infrastructure, not a speculative memetoken. Key features that create asymmetric upside potential:

  • Milestone-driven funding (phased presale): CTK’s multi-phase presale releases capital against verifiable product and pilot milestones — reducing the “one-shot” dilution risk and aligning price discovery with execution.
  • Real-world revenue pathway: CTK funds property-development finance flows, creating potential repeatable cashflows tied to repayments and fees.
  • Compliance-first build: integrated KYC/AML, audit trails, and legal frameworks make it more palatable to conservative capital — increasing the chance of larger institutional allocations if pilots succeed.
  • Chain-agnostic proofs: CTK plans to use L1/L2 settlement and oracle layers (including ETH L2s) for attestation, meaning it leverages existing technical rails rather than inventing them.

These design choices increase the conditional convexity: upside is larger than a random presale because hitting milestones materially de-risks the project for bigger buyers.

CTK presale vs holding L1s — practical tradeoffs

  • Downside protection: BTC/ETH have deeper liquidity and institutional custody; CTK presale liquidity is limited early — meaning greater downside risk if execution stalls.
  • Upside potential: a successful CTK runway of pilots + lender onboarding could deliver outsized returns compared to incremental L1 gains.
  • Time to monetization: L1 upside can be realized with market moves; CTK requires operational milestones (pilot closings, tranche releases).
  • Institutional interest: CTK’s compliance posture and tranche funding are intentionally designed to convert cautious institutional curiosity into meaningful capital — a structural advantage over typical presales.

Catalysts that turn CTK’s convexity real

  1. Signed pilot financing deals with regional developers and lenders.
  2. Independent audits that validate milestone-verification mechanics.
  3. Demonstrable tranche releases tied to measurable KPIs.
  4. Initial exchange/OTC windows enabling scaled institutional entry.

Risks — don’t ignore them

Regulatory complexity, partner execution failures, and unreliable oracle attestations are real risks. Investors should judge CTK by verifiable milestones — not price chatter.

Final thought

BTC and ETH supply the runway; high-convexity bets like CTK can take off only when execution and compliance convert interest into institutional capital. ConstructKoin’s phased presale and compliance-first architecture create a conditional pathway to higher convexity — but it’s a results-driven play. If CTK proves pilots and secures lender commitments, the presale could outperform standard L1 exposure in percentage terms. Until then, it remains a strategic, higher-risk allocation for diversified portfolios.

Name: Construct Koin (CTK)

Telegram: https://t.me/constructkoin

Twitter: https://x.com/constructkoin

Website: https://constructkoin.com


This publication is sponsored. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before engaging in any cryptocurrency-related actions. Coindoo will not be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damages or losses resulting from the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned. Always do your own research.

Author

Alex is an experienced financial journalist and cryptocurrency enthusiast. With over 8 years of experience covering the crypto, blockchain, and fintech industries, he is well-versed in the complex and ever-evolving world of digital assets. His insightful and thought-provoking articles provide readers with a clear picture of the latest developments and trends in the market. His approach allows him to break down complex ideas into accessible and in-depth content. Follow his publications to stay up to date with the most important trends and topics.

Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/bitcoin-vs-ethereum-price-update-btc-115k-eth-4-2k-ctk-presale-vs-l1s-which-offers-higher-convexity/

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025?

XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025?

The post XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The XRP price has come under enormous pressure
Paylaş
CoinPedia2025/12/16 19:22
BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

The post BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlackRock is steering $185 billion worth of model portfolios deeper into US stocks and artificial intelligence. The decision came this week as the asset manager adjusted its entire model suite, increasing its equity allocation and dumping exposure to international developed markets. The firm now sits 2% overweight on stocks, after money moved between several of its biggest exchange-traded funds. This wasn’t a slow shuffle. Billions flowed across multiple ETFs on Tuesday as BlackRock executed the realignment. The iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) alone brought in $3.4 billion, the largest single-day haul in its history. The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) collected $2.3 billion, while the iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) added nearly $2 billion. The rebalancing triggered swift inflows and outflows that realigned investor exposure on the back of performance data and macroeconomic outlooks. BlackRock raises equities on strong US earnings The model updates come as BlackRock backs the rally in American stocks, fueled by strong earnings and optimism around rate cuts. In an investment letter obtained by Bloomberg, the firm said US companies have delivered 11% earnings growth since the third quarter of 2024. Meanwhile, earnings across other developed markets barely touched 2%. That gap helped push the decision to drop international holdings in favor of American ones. Michael Gates, lead portfolio manager for BlackRock’s Target Allocation ETF model portfolio suite, said the US market is the only one showing consistency in sales growth, profit delivery, and revisions in analyst forecasts. “The US equity market continues to stand alone in terms of earnings delivery, sales growth and sustainable trends in analyst estimates and revisions,” Michael wrote. He added that non-US developed markets lagged far behind, especially when it came to sales. This week’s changes reflect that position. The move was made ahead of the Federal…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:44