The post When the AI bill comes due, someone needs to pick up the tab appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Every trading day, I play a good-cop, bad-cop routine when it comes to the AI gravy train. The good cop sees boundless upside — the new industrial age unfolding in teraflops, a productivity boom financed by silicon and sweat. The bad cop, meanwhile, glances at LQD sagging under the weight of new supply and wonders how long the credit market can keep swallowing it all. Both have a point. Because this isn’t just another tech cycle — it’s the most capital-intensive build-out in modern market history, and the fuel isn’t earnings anymore, it’s debt. The numbers are staggering. More than $200 billion of AI-linked issuance has already flooded the market this year — more than a quarter of total net U.S. corporate supply. Meta alone dropped $30 billion, drawing a record $125 billion in orders; Oracle’s $18 billion sale in September was snapped up to fund data-center capacity leased to OpenAI. The credit market has become the primary financier of the AI revolution, and investors are lining up for a taste of the future, coupons and all. But beneath the euphoria sits a strange symmetry — the circular nature of the money. Nvidia sells the chips to Oracle. Oracle builds the racks for OpenAI. Microsoft bankrolls OpenAI, allowing it to purchase even more computing power. Meta issues a paper to fund its own hyperscale empire. Dollars spin through the system like current through a circuit board, each node feeding the next. Nothing leaves the ecosystem; it just recirculates between vendors, customers, and financiers, turning Wall Street into a kind of closed-loop liquidity engine. So far, everyone’s happy. Credit spreads remain tight, the big names are pristine, and there’s still more cash chasing paper than paper chasing buyers. Yet the LQD tape tells a quieter story — not one of panic,… The post When the AI bill comes due, someone needs to pick up the tab appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Every trading day, I play a good-cop, bad-cop routine when it comes to the AI gravy train. The good cop sees boundless upside — the new industrial age unfolding in teraflops, a productivity boom financed by silicon and sweat. The bad cop, meanwhile, glances at LQD sagging under the weight of new supply and wonders how long the credit market can keep swallowing it all. Both have a point. Because this isn’t just another tech cycle — it’s the most capital-intensive build-out in modern market history, and the fuel isn’t earnings anymore, it’s debt. The numbers are staggering. More than $200 billion of AI-linked issuance has already flooded the market this year — more than a quarter of total net U.S. corporate supply. Meta alone dropped $30 billion, drawing a record $125 billion in orders; Oracle’s $18 billion sale in September was snapped up to fund data-center capacity leased to OpenAI. The credit market has become the primary financier of the AI revolution, and investors are lining up for a taste of the future, coupons and all. But beneath the euphoria sits a strange symmetry — the circular nature of the money. Nvidia sells the chips to Oracle. Oracle builds the racks for OpenAI. Microsoft bankrolls OpenAI, allowing it to purchase even more computing power. Meta issues a paper to fund its own hyperscale empire. Dollars spin through the system like current through a circuit board, each node feeding the next. Nothing leaves the ecosystem; it just recirculates between vendors, customers, and financiers, turning Wall Street into a kind of closed-loop liquidity engine. So far, everyone’s happy. Credit spreads remain tight, the big names are pristine, and there’s still more cash chasing paper than paper chasing buyers. Yet the LQD tape tells a quieter story — not one of panic,…

When the AI bill comes due, someone needs to pick up the tab

2025/11/04 08:22

Every trading day, I play a good-cop, bad-cop routine when it comes to the AI gravy train. The good cop sees boundless upside — the new industrial age unfolding in teraflops, a productivity boom financed by silicon and sweat. The bad cop, meanwhile, glances at LQD sagging under the weight of new supply and wonders how long the credit market can keep swallowing it all. Both have a point. Because this isn’t just another tech cycle — it’s the most capital-intensive build-out in modern market history, and the fuel isn’t earnings anymore, it’s debt.

The numbers are staggering. More than $200 billion of AI-linked issuance has already flooded the market this year — more than a quarter of total net U.S. corporate supply. Meta alone dropped $30 billion, drawing a record $125 billion in orders; Oracle’s $18 billion sale in September was snapped up to fund data-center capacity leased to OpenAI. The credit market has become the primary financier of the AI revolution, and investors are lining up for a taste of the future, coupons and all.

But beneath the euphoria sits a strange symmetry — the circular nature of the money. Nvidia sells the chips to Oracle. Oracle builds the racks for OpenAI. Microsoft bankrolls OpenAI, allowing it to purchase even more computing power. Meta issues a paper to fund its own hyperscale empire. Dollars spin through the system like current through a circuit board, each node feeding the next. Nothing leaves the ecosystem; it just recirculates between vendors, customers, and financiers, turning Wall Street into a kind of closed-loop liquidity engine.

So far, everyone’s happy. Credit spreads remain tight, the big names are pristine, and there’s still more cash chasing paper than paper chasing buyers. Yet the LQD tape tells a quieter story — not one of panic, but of indigestion. When this much duration hits the market at once, prices soften, ETFs cheapen, and dealers groan under the weight of inventory. It’s not credit risk; it’s plumbing pressure.

The larger question is sustainability. These aren’t light-capex stories. Data centers burn cash the way rocket engines burn fuel — with high thrust, a short burn, and constant refueling. The assets depreciate faster than the returns come in. That’s fine when the cycle’s young and rates are steady, but once refinancing costs rise or growth stalls, the loop tightens. Someone in the chain — a vendor, a customer, a financier — ends up short of breath.

The good cop in me still buys the vision: AI as infrastructure, as the new rail network of the digital world. But the bad cop keeps a hand on the brake, reminding me that the returns on capital still lag the cost of capital. For now, the bond market is content to keep the punch bowl full — but the tab is growing fast.

The music’s still playing, the servers still hum, and the crowd still believes. But under the fluorescent light of those data centers, one truth glows brighter than all: somebody’s gotta pay for the AI party — and this time, it’s the bond market footing the bill.

Desk note:
The street’s still buying the dream, but the tape’s telling you it’s getting full — liquidity’s fine until it isn’t, and right now, LQD’s the first place you’ll see the hangover start.

Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/when-the-ai-bill-comes-due-someone-needs-to-pick-up-the-tab-202511032357

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield

Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield

The post Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Botanix Labs has launched stBTC, a liquid staking token designed to turn Bitcoin into a yield-bearing asset by redistributing network gas fees directly to users. The protocol will begin yield accrual later this week, with its Genesis Vault scheduled to open on Sept. 25, capped at 50 BTC. The initiative marks one of the first attempts to generate Bitcoin-native yield without relying on inflationary token models or centralized custodians. stBTC works by allowing users to deposit Bitcoin into Botanix’s permissionless smart contract, receiving stBTC tokens that represent their share of the staking vault. As transactions occur, 50% of Botanix network gas fees, paid in BTC, flow back to stBTC holders. Over time, the value of stBTC increases relative to BTC, enabling users to redeem their original deposit plus yield. Botanix estimates early returns could reach 20–50% annually before stabilizing around 6–8%, a level similar to Ethereum staking but fully denominated in Bitcoin. Botanix says that security audits have been completed by Spearbit and Sigma Prime, and the protocol is built on the EIP-4626 vault standard, which also underpins Ethereum-based staking products. The company’s Spiderchain architecture, operated by 16 independent entities including Galaxy, Alchemy, and Fireblocks, secures the network. If adoption grows, Botanix argues the system could make Bitcoin a productive, composable asset for decentralized finance, while reinforcing network consensus. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/botanix-launches-stbtc
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:37