Elon Musk spent most of his time at Tesla’s third-quarter earnings call arguing for his controversial $1 trillion pay package while snapping at shareholder advisory firms that dared to oppose it. “There needs to be enough voting control to give a strong influence, but not so much that I can’t be fired if I go […]Elon Musk spent most of his time at Tesla’s third-quarter earnings call arguing for his controversial $1 trillion pay package while snapping at shareholder advisory firms that dared to oppose it. “There needs to be enough voting control to give a strong influence, but not so much that I can’t be fired if I go […]

Tesla Q3 earnings miss forecasts as Musk clashes with critics over $1T payout

2025/10/24 01:49

Elon Musk spent most of his time at Tesla’s third-quarter earnings call arguing for his controversial $1 trillion pay package while snapping at shareholder advisory firms that dared to oppose it.

“There needs to be enough voting control to give a strong influence, but not so much that I can’t be fired if I go insane,” Elon said, cutting off his own chief financial officer as the call wrapped after more than an hour. The vote on his record-breaking pay will happen at Tesla’s annual meeting in Austin on November 6.

The call, which started calmly, turned heated when Elon brushed through numbers to chat about his usual tech dreams: AI, humanoid robots, and self-driving software. But for all the futuristic talk, the short-term numbers were less exciting.

Adjusted earnings landed at 50 cents per share, missing the 54-cent estimate. Revenue, however, climbed to $28.1 billion, beating expectations of $26.37 billion. The company’s automotive revenue jumped 6% year over year, rising from $20 billion to $21.2 billion.

The uptick came largely from buyers rushing in before federal EV tax credits expired, a tailwind that may not repeat in the next quarter.

Analysts dissect Tesla’s Q3 report and forecasts

Colin Langan from Wells Fargo kept an underweight rating and a brutal $120 price target, suggesting a 73% downside from Tesla’s last close. He said Tesla threw out “an array of promises for 2026, including robots, semitruck ramps in the second half of 2026, and fully autonomous cybercabs by Q2 2026.”

But he warned the company’s “core business is deteriorating” while Robotaxi and Optimus are likely to take longer to scale.

At UBS, analysts slapped a sell rating with a $247 target, roughly 44% below Tesla’s market value. They said Elon’s team gave “very little in terms of near-term outlook,” calling it “purposeful.” They argued Tesla is trying to move from being a car company to an AI company, but the market already values the AI side at around $900 billion, which leaves little room for mistakes.

Jefferies was less harsh, keeping a hold rating and $300 target, saying Tesla had a “slight EBIT and margin miss after $238 million in non-recurring charges,” but strong free cash flow of $4 billion, boosted by a $2.1 billion working capital inflow. The firm said Tesla’s auto business no longer drives valuation but continues to fund future AI and robotics projects.

Wall Street splits on Elon’s $1T payday and AI narrative

Barclays called it “irrelevant that Tesla missed EPS,” assigning an equal weight rating and a $350 target. The bank said Elon’s focus is now clearly on autonomy and robots, not traditional vehicles.

Goldman Sachs maintained a neutral rating and a $400 target, expecting earnings growth to come from autonomy and robotics, though warned that Elon might be too optimistic in a client note sent on Friday.

Meanwhile, Adam Jonas of Morgan Stanley, one of Elon’s most vocal supporters, gave Tesla an overweight rating with a $410 target, roughly 7% below its recent close. Jonas said “margins were in line” while “$4 billion in free cash flow was triple consensus,” adding Tesla is “navigating a dignified exit from the steering-wheel-having auto business.”

Adam said Tesla’s fate now hinges on Elon’s ability to “steal the fire on autonomy” amid competition from the Mag 7 tech group.

Deutsche Bank analyst Emmanuel Rosner took the most optimistic tone, raising his target slightly from $435 to $440 per share and keeping a buy rating. He said Elon “is clearly dialed in,” adding that the passing of his compensation package “will be important in ensuring that continues.”

Emmanuel said Robotaxi and Optimus are progressing slower than expected but added that the next version of Full Self-Driving software (v14) could mark a turning point. He also said Tesla “may ultimately prove to be the only Western company capable of manufacturing humanoids at scale.”

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
2025/09/18 00:09
Share