Jeremy Kranz warned that privately issued stablecoins carry the same risks as CBDCs, plus their own unique dangers.Jeremy Kranz warned that privately issued stablecoins carry the same risks as CBDCs, plus their own unique dangers.

Sentinel Global founder warns stablecoins mirror CBDC risks

2025/10/19 14:00

Jeremy Kranz, founder and managing partner of the venture capital firm Sentinel Global, has urged investors to exercise caution when dealing with privately issued stablecoins.

According to Kranz, these assets carry all the risks associated with central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), as well as additional, unique vulnerabilities of their own.

Kranz refers to privately issued stablecoins as a “central business digital currency.” Based on his explanation, they include similar monitoring features, backdoors, programmability, and controls in CBDCs.

Jeremy Kranz warns of risks associated with stablecoins 

When asked to elaborate, Kranz noted that central business digital currencies and stablecoins are essentially alike. To illustrate this, the founder of Sentinel Global provided an example, explaining that if JP Morgan developed a dollar-pegged stablecoin and managed it under laws such as the Patriot Act or any future regulations, they could decide to freeze one’s funds or stop them from utilizing banking services.

Kranz also mentioned that stablecoin issuers who provide more collateral than necessary and acquire their blockchain tokens using cash and short-term government securities could encounter “bank runs” if many holders attempt to cash in their tokens simultaneously.

Additionally, he observed that algorithmic and synthetic stablecoins rely on software or complex transactions to maintain their value in relation to the dollar. Based on his explanation, this move introduces risks, such as increasing the likelihood of losing that connection amid situations like market volatility or sudden declines in crypto derivative markets.

Kranz’s remarks followed his perspective that technology is a neutral tool that can either assist in creating an enhanced financial future for individuals or be misused. 

According to him, the outcomes depend on individual investors taking the time to read the details, evaluating the risks, and making a prudent choice regarding their financial products. 

Considering the effects the swift development of stablecoins, crypto, and tokenization technologies brings about, Kranz likened the development to being “10 black swan events” because these advancements bring both chances and dangers.

The GENIUS stablecoin bill faces criticism from several US lawmakers

DeFiLlama recently released data showing that the total market value of stablecoins rose above $300 billion in October. This demonstrated growing interest in stablecoin following the announcement that the US passed its GENIUS stablecoin bill in July.

This was after the US Senate voted 68-30 to approve the GENIUS Act, around six weeks after Tennessee Senator Bill Hagerty introduced it. With this remarkable announcement, sources have highlighted the increasing likelihood that the House of Representatives may soon review the STABLE Act, the bill’s companion, which may undergo various adjustments before a final vote. Notably, the STABLE Act and the GENIUS Act aim to regulate stablecoins. 

Regarding the approval of the GENIUS Act, lawmakers received the announcement with mixed reactions. An example of these lawmakers is Marjorie Taylor Greene, a representative from Georgia. Greene referred to the bill as a CBDC Trojan Horse. 

She further shared an X post dated July 15, stating that this bill regulates stablecoins while creating a backdoor for a central bank digital currency.

“The Federal Reserve has been planning for years to develop a CBDC, and this will lead us toward a cashless society with digital currency that an authoritarian government could use against you by controlling your ability to trade,” Greene added.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
2025/09/18 00:36