0G Labs launched its Aristotle Mainnet in September 2025 with a storage layer designed for AI workloads, achieving 2 GB/s throughput and backing from over 100 partners including Google Cloud and Chainlink.0G Labs launched its Aristotle Mainnet in September 2025 with a storage layer designed for AI workloads, achieving 2 GB/s throughput and backing from over 100 partners including Google Cloud and Chainlink.

How 0G Storage Plans to Solve the $76 Billion Problem Every AI Company Faces

2025/10/21 20:05

As AI systems consume data at rates never seen before, a question emerges that could define the next decade of technological progress: where will all this data live, and who will control access to it?

\ The answer arrived quietly in September 2025. 0G Labs launched its Aristotle Mainnet, bringing with it a storage layer designed specifically for AI workloads. The launch came with backing from over 100 ecosystem partners, including Chainlink, Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, and major wallet providers like Coinbase and MetaMask.

\

The Data Storage Crisis No One is Talking About

\ Every AI system, from chatbots to autonomous vehicles, depends on one fundamental resource: data. Not just any data, but vast quantities that must be stored, accessed, and processed at speeds that push current infrastructure to its limits.

\ The AI-powered storage market reached $30.57 billion in 2024 and analysts project it will grow to $118.38 billion by 2030. Behind these numbers sits a reality that most developers face daily. AI training datasets now require terabytes or petabytes of storage. A facial recognition system alone needs over 450,000 images. Large language models consume millions of text samples. The data never stops growing.

\ Traditional decentralized storage solutions like IPFS, Filecoin, and Arweave were built for different purposes. IPFS acts as a protocol for content addressing but lacks persistence guarantees. Filecoin creates a marketplace for storage but requires continuous deal renewals. Arweave offers permanent storage through one-time payments but faces challenges with cost and retrieval speed. None were designed for the rapid updates, structured querying, and millisecond-level performance that AI applications demand.

\ Michael Heinrich, CEO and co-founder of 0G Labs, stated in the mainnet announcement: "Our mission at 0G is to make AI a public good, which involves dismantling barriers, whether geopolitical or technological, and this launch marks a milestone in that journey. I could not be more proud of the 100-plus partners who are standing with us from day one. Together, we are building the first AI chain with a complete modular decentralized operating system, ensuring AI is not locked away in Big Tech silos but made available as a resource for everyone."

\

What Makes 0G Storage Different

0G Storage operates through a dual-layer architecture that separates concerns in a way that existing protocols do not. The Log Layer handles unstructured data like model weights, datasets, and event logs through an append-only system. Every entry receives a timestamp and permanent record. Data gets split into chunks, erasure coded, and distributed across the network for redundancy.

\ The Key-Value Layer sits above this foundation, enabling structured queries with millisecond performance. This layer allows applications to store and retrieve specific data points such as vector embeddings, user states, or metadata while maintaining immutability through logging every update.

\ This architecture enables real-world use cases already in motion: AI agents retrieving context on demand, DePIN networks streaming sensor data, LLM pipelines accessing training data, and applications persisting state data across chains.

\ Performance benchmarks from the V3 testnet demonstrate the system's capabilities. 0G Storage achieved 2 GB per second in throughput, which the team describes as the fastest performance recorded in decentralized AI infrastructure. The Galileo testnet delivered a 70% throughput increase over previous versions and can process up to 2,500 transactions per second using optimized CometBFT consensus.

\ Security comes through cryptographic commitments for all stored data, allowing every operation to be tracked and verified. The system uses Proof of Replication and Availability, where storage providers face random challenges to prove they hold specific data. Failure to respond results in slashed rewards.

\

The Economics of Keeping Data Alive

Storage at AI scale presents not just technical challenges but economic ones. 0G introduces a three-part incentive structure that balances cost with long-term availability. Users pay a one-time storage fee based on data size. A portion of this fee becomes a Storage Endowment, streamed over time to storage miners for continued availability. The system adds Data Sharing Royalties, where nodes earn rewards for helping others retrieve and validate data through PoRA challenges.

\ This model contrasts with competitors. Filecoin operates on ongoing storage deals that require continuous renewal. Arweave charges higher upfront costs for permanent storage, which can become prohibitive for large datasets. IPFS lacks built-in economic incentives entirely, making data persistence dependent on manual pinning or third-party services.

\ The network went live with operational infrastructure from day one. Validators, DeFi protocols, and developer platforms provide indexing, SDKs, RPCs, and security services ready for production workloads.

\

The Platform Making It Visible

StorageScan serves as the transparency layer for 0G Storage. The platform received updates in May 2025 that added real-time analytics, miner leaderboards, and reward tracking for both Turbo and Standard storage nodes.

\ The interface splits networks by performance tier. Standard Network uses HDD storage for cost efficiency with less time-sensitive data. Turbo Network deploys SSD storage for applications requiring faster access. Storage providers can track earnings across 24-hour, 3-day, and 7-day periods, giving visibility into node performance and optimization opportunities.

\ This transparency addresses a gap in existing decentralized storage systems, where providers often lack clear insights into network operations and reward distribution.

\

Where This Fits in the Bigger Picture

0G Labs raised $35 million across two equity rounds to support development. The mainnet launch follows extensive testing. The Testnet V3, called Galileo, saw 2.5 million unique wallets, 350 million-plus transactions, and roughly 530,000 smart contracts deployed.

\ The storage market context matters here. Mordor Intelligence values the AI-powered storage market at $27.06 billion in 2025 and projects $76.6 billion by 2030. Cloud storage will reach $137.3 billion by 2025 according to market research firms. Analysis from 2023 indicated that decentralized storage costs roughly 78% less than centralized alternatives, with enterprise-level differences reaching 121 times.

\ Yet adoption remains limited. Centralized storage still dominates due to better user experience and mature product ecosystems. The challenge for 0G and similar platforms lies in bridging this gap while providing the performance characteristics that AI applications require.

\

The Composability Factor

0G Storage operates as a modular system. Developers can integrate it into existing applications, use it with or without the 0G chain, or plug it into custom rollups or virtual machines. This design philosophy differs from closed ecosystems that lock users into specific architectures.

\ The platform supports applications across chains and intelligent agents, positioning storage as infrastructure rather than a siloed service. This approach aligns with how developers increasingly build applications that span multiple blockchains and execution environments.

\

What Comes Next

The mainnet launch represents a starting point rather than a destination. AI data requirements continue to grow. The global AI training dataset market reached $2.6 billion in 2024 and analysts project $8.6 billion by 2030. By 2025, 181 zettabytes of data will be generated globally.

\ Storage infrastructure that can handle this scale while maintaining decentralization, verifiability, and performance will determine which AI systems can operate independently of centralized control. The question is no longer whether AI needs better storage infrastructure. The question is whether solutions like 0G Storage can deliver on promises that existing systems cannot fulfill.

\ For developers building AI agents, DePIN networks, or applications requiring persistent state across chains, the availability of production-ready infrastructure changes what becomes possible. For the broader blockchain ecosystem, it tests whether decentralized systems can compete with centralized alternatives on performance rather than just ideology.

\ The data keeps growing. The models keep getting larger. The question of where to store it all and who controls access matters more with each passing month. 0G Storage enters a market where the stakes extend beyond technology into questions of access, control, and what it means to build AI systems that no single entity can shut down.

\

Final Thoughts

The launch of 0G Storage on mainnet arrives at a moment when AI infrastructure faces real constraints. Traditional decentralized storage protocols struggle with the performance demands of AI workloads. Centralized solutions maintain control over data access in ways that conflict with the vision of open AI systems.

\ What 0G Storage offers is not revolutionary in concept but potentially transformative in execution. The dual-layer architecture addresses real pain points that developers face. The economic model creates incentives for long-term data availability without the recurring costs that make existing solutions prohibitive at scale. The modular design enables integration across ecosystems rather than forcing lock-in.

\ Whether this translates to widespread adoption depends on factors beyond technology. Developers must choose to build on it. Storage providers must find the economics attractive enough to participate. The performance must hold up under real-world load. The ecosystem must continue to grow and attract the applications that justify the infrastructure.

\ The data storage crisis facing AI development will not resolve itself. As models grow larger and applications more complex, the infrastructure question becomes more urgent. 0G Storage presents one answer to this challenge. Time will tell if it becomes the answer that the industry needs.

Don’t forget to like and share the story!

:::tip This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program. HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYO

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
2025/09/18 11:00
Sonic Holders Accumulate Millions as Price Tests Key Levels

Sonic Holders Accumulate Millions as Price Tests Key Levels

The post Sonic Holders Accumulate Millions as Price Tests Key Levels appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Top 25 wallets added 12.22M SONIC, led by SonicLabs treasury accumulation. Accumulation may link to governance vote, RWA tokenization, or liquidity pool plans. Analyst Van de Poppe says Sonic has strong support and big upside potenti Sonic (S) is trading around $0.29 at the time of writing, down slightly on the day. Despite the pullback, activity from large holders has turned heads in the market. Top Holders Add 12 Million SONIC In the past 24 hours, the top 25 Sonic wallets accumulated 12.22 million tokens. This amount is more than 51 times the daily average, according to on-chain data. The buying was led by the SonicLabs treasury, hinting that most of the wallets involved are connected to the project itself. 🚨 Breaking: in the past 24 hours, the top 25 Sonic holders added +12.22M tokens – This is 51x the daily average – The surge is led by @SonicLabs treasury– the 25 wallets are all likely owned by Sonic So what is likely the reason? 🤔 – the team are positioning themselves for… pic.twitter.com/5WrQKibeGA — Intel Scout (@IntelScout) September 17, 2025 There are speculations that the move could be linked to upcoming developments. These include preparation for an institutional governance vote, progress in real-world asset (RWA) initiatives such as FinChain’s $328 million tokenization project, and possible allocation of SONIC to support RWA trading and liquidity pools. Related: Analyst Singles Out XRP to Rival Bitcoin. Not in Price Though Sonic Hasn’t Seen An ‘Uptrend’ Yet Analyst Michaël van de Poppe said the Sonic ecosystem is one worth keeping an eye on. He explained that the project is holding on to strong support levels, which shows that its price has a solid foundation. According to him, the potential for upside remains big, even though Sonic has not yet entered a clear uptrend.…
Share
2025/09/18 05:22