The post Do Bitcoin Whales Really Control Market Ups and Downs? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key takeaways:  Since 2024, spot ETF inflows and outflows have been the strongest driver of Bitcoin’s green and red days. With exchange balances near multi-year lows, any sizable order travels farther through the book. Large holders often split trades or use OTC desks, muting visible “wallet-moved” shocks. Funding rates, open interest, the dollar and yields often shape the day’s direction more than any single wallet. Everyone “knows” whales move Bitcoin (BTC), and they can still jolt prices. Since spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) arrived, Bitcoin’s direction often hinges on ETF inflows and outflows. It also depends on how much tradable supply actually sits on exchanges, not on any single wallet’s whim. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT), for instance, now holds more than 800,000 BTC on behalf of thousands of investors. Flows through that pipe can rival any one holder. Layer in derivatives positioning and the broader risk-on/risk-off mood, and you get the real picture. This guide cuts through the whale lore, explains the market mechanics that actually matter and gives you a quick data checklist to read the tape without chasing every viral “whale just moved” alert. What counts as a “whale?” In crypto, a whale refers to an onchain entity holding at least 1,000 BTC. Many dashboards specifically track the 1,000 BTC-5,000 BTC range. An entity is a cluster of addresses controlled by the same owner, not a single wallet. Analytics firms group addresses using heuristics such as co-spends and change detection to ensure one holder isn’t counted multiple times across separate deposits. That distinction matters because raw “rich list” address counts can exaggerate concentration. Large services such as exchanges, ETF custodians and payment processors operate thousands of wallets, and labeled clusters help separate those from end investors. Both academic and industry research have long cautioned against drawing conclusions… The post Do Bitcoin Whales Really Control Market Ups and Downs? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key takeaways:  Since 2024, spot ETF inflows and outflows have been the strongest driver of Bitcoin’s green and red days. With exchange balances near multi-year lows, any sizable order travels farther through the book. Large holders often split trades or use OTC desks, muting visible “wallet-moved” shocks. Funding rates, open interest, the dollar and yields often shape the day’s direction more than any single wallet. Everyone “knows” whales move Bitcoin (BTC), and they can still jolt prices. Since spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) arrived, Bitcoin’s direction often hinges on ETF inflows and outflows. It also depends on how much tradable supply actually sits on exchanges, not on any single wallet’s whim. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT), for instance, now holds more than 800,000 BTC on behalf of thousands of investors. Flows through that pipe can rival any one holder. Layer in derivatives positioning and the broader risk-on/risk-off mood, and you get the real picture. This guide cuts through the whale lore, explains the market mechanics that actually matter and gives you a quick data checklist to read the tape without chasing every viral “whale just moved” alert. What counts as a “whale?” In crypto, a whale refers to an onchain entity holding at least 1,000 BTC. Many dashboards specifically track the 1,000 BTC-5,000 BTC range. An entity is a cluster of addresses controlled by the same owner, not a single wallet. Analytics firms group addresses using heuristics such as co-spends and change detection to ensure one holder isn’t counted multiple times across separate deposits. That distinction matters because raw “rich list” address counts can exaggerate concentration. Large services such as exchanges, ETF custodians and payment processors operate thousands of wallets, and labeled clusters help separate those from end investors. Both academic and industry research have long cautioned against drawing conclusions…

Do Bitcoin Whales Really Control Market Ups and Downs?

2025/10/25 09:50

Key takeaways: 

  • Since 2024, spot ETF inflows and outflows have been the strongest driver of Bitcoin’s green and red days.

  • With exchange balances near multi-year lows, any sizable order travels farther through the book.

  • Large holders often split trades or use OTC desks, muting visible “wallet-moved” shocks.

  • Funding rates, open interest, the dollar and yields often shape the day’s direction more than any single wallet.

Everyone “knows” whales move Bitcoin (BTC), and they can still jolt prices.

Since spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) arrived, Bitcoin’s direction often hinges on ETF inflows and outflows. It also depends on how much tradable supply actually sits on exchanges, not on any single wallet’s whim. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT), for instance, now holds more than 800,000 BTC on behalf of thousands of investors. Flows through that pipe can rival any one holder.

Layer in derivatives positioning and the broader risk-on/risk-off mood, and you get the real picture.

This guide cuts through the whale lore, explains the market mechanics that actually matter and gives you a quick data checklist to read the tape without chasing every viral “whale just moved” alert.

What counts as a “whale?”

In crypto, a whale refers to an onchain entity holding at least 1,000 BTC. Many dashboards specifically track the 1,000 BTC-5,000 BTC range.

An entity is a cluster of addresses controlled by the same owner, not a single wallet. Analytics firms group addresses using heuristics such as co-spends and change detection to ensure one holder isn’t counted multiple times across separate deposits.

That distinction matters because raw “rich list” address counts can exaggerate concentration. Large services such as exchanges, ETF custodians and payment processors operate thousands of wallets, and labeled clusters help separate those from end investors. Both academic and industry research have long cautioned against drawing conclusions from address data alone.

Methodologies differ. Some whale metrics include service entities such as exchanges, ETF or custody pools and corporations. Others exclude known exchange and miner clusters to focus on true investor whales.

In this guide, we use an entity-based convention of ≥1,000 BTC and clearly note where service wallets are included or excluded so you know exactly what each metric represents.

Did you know? The number of entities holding at least 1,000 BTC recently topped 1,670, the highest level since early 2021.

How concentrated is BTC today, and who holds it?

Since US spot ETFs launched, a large share of visible Bitcoin supply has shifted into custodial pools. BlackRock’s IBIT alone holds roughly 800,000 BTC, making it the largest known holder. However, it’s held in custody on behalf of many investors, not as a single balance.

Across issuers, US spot ETFs collectively hold about 1.66 million BTC, roughly 6.4% of the total 21 million supply. This centralizes execution even though underlying ownership remains widely distributed.

Corporations are another major group. MicroStrategy recently disclosed holdings of about 640,000 BTC. Miners, exchanges and unlabeled long-term holders make up the rest of the largest clusters.

Meanwhile, the tradable float on centralized exchanges continues to shrink. Glassnode’s tracked balances fell to a six-year low of about 2.83 million BTC in early October 2025. With fewer coins on exchanges, large orders tend to move prices more.

Bear in mind that “top address” rich lists often overstate concentration because major services operate thousands of wallets. Entity-level clustering and labeled wallets, such as those belonging to ETFs, exchanges and corporations, offer a clearer picture of who actually controls the coins.

Did you know? US spot ETFs now custody over 1.6 million BTC, representing just above 6% of the total supply held by institutions and funds.

Can whales flip the market intraday? 

Big, aggressive orders can move prices sharply, especially when order-book depth thins out. During volatile periods, liquidity often disappears, and large sell blocks can punch through the book with outsized impact. That’s basic market microstructure.

Because of this, many large holders avoid “hitting the book.” They split their orders or use over-the-counter (OTC) desks to execute blocks quietly, reducing both their footprint and information leakage. In practice, a significant share of whale activity occurs off-exchange, which reduces the visible impact from any single wallet on public venues.

Across cycles, whales don’t always “pump.” Studies combining exchange and onchain data show that large holders often sell into strength, particularly when smaller traders are buying. Their flows can temper rallies rather than lead them.

A 2025 snapshot fits this pattern: As prices pushed above $120,000 alongside strong ETF inflows and broad accumulation, “mega-whales” took profits at the margin. Intraday direction often tracked ETF flows and available liquidity more than any one whale wallet.

Did you know? One well-known “OG” whale recently sold thousands of BTC to purchase nearly $4 billion in Ether (ETH).

What really turns markets green or red on most days?

Since January 2024, spot ETF flows have become one of Bitcoin’s most reliable daily signals. Strong weekly inflows have often coincided with pushes to new highs, while softer or negative prints tend to align with down days. Pair this with a live flow dashboard to track how US ETFs are leaning each session.

Liquidity on exchanges matters just as much. With balances on centralized exchanges down to about 2.83 million BTC, a six-year low, there’s now less readily tradable supply. Thinner liquidity means even routine buy or sell programs cut deeper into the order book, amplifying price swings across all participant types.

Positioning and leverage often drive intraday swings. When funding turns rich or deeply negative and open interest (OI) rebuilds after a wipeout, the path of least resistance can shift quickly.

Keep monitoring funding and OI to gauge crowding. Recently, with roughly 97% of supply in profit and a slight easing in long-term holder distribution, markets have become more sensitive to fresh flows and headlines.

Finally, macro still drives crypto beta. Dollar trends, US yields and broader risk appetite often move in step with Bitcoin’s daily direction. On quieter data days, ranges tend to compress; when macro heats up, crypto usually follows.

Quick checklist

  • ETF flows: Track yesterday’s net inflows/outflows and total turnover.

  • Liquidity: Watch exchange balance trends and order book depth across major venues.

  • Positioning: Review funding-rate heatmaps and OI rebuilds after liquidations.

  • Macro tape: Monitor the dollar index, 10-year yield and equity-market breadth.

Do whales still set Bitcoin’s tone for the day?

Whales can move prices, but they rarely decide how the day ends. When liquidity thins, a single large order can push a move further than usual. Most large holders now split trades into smaller clips or route them through OTC desks, softening the impact seen on public books.

Since 2024, spot ETF flows have been the main force behind daily direction, alongside the heavy trading volumes passing through those funds. Watching the previous day’s net flows and turnover gives a clearer sense of that bias.

With tradable supply on exchanges sitting near multi-year lows, even a marginal buyer or seller — whether a whale, market maker or retail wave — can move prices further than normal. Larger holders often sell into strength rather than “pump,” a pattern that tends to cap rallies instead of fueling them.

Macro factors still drive much of the action. Shifts in the dollar and US yields influence risk appetite, pulling Bitcoin in the same direction.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/can-the-biggest-bitcoin-whales-really-decide-when-the-market-turns-green-or-red?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
2025/09/18 02:21
SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst

SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst

The post SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SUI price shows a technical setup for a macro breakout with analyst Dan Gambardello targeting $10-$11 levels. Recent partnership with Google’s Agentic Payments Protocol adds fundamental support to the technical analysis as SUI moves closer to potential breakout levels. SUI Price Analysis Points to $10-$11 Breakout Target Dan Gambardello has identified a clear ascending triangle formation on SUI price daily chart with upside targets around $10.79. The analyst simplified this target range to $10-$11 for practical trading purposes. The pattern shows sustained higher lows meeting resistance at current levels before a potential breakout. VanEck maintains more aggressive SUI crypto targets ranging from $13-$25 according to Gambardello’s research. SUI Price Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X The $10 level is a more conservative higher high area for the current cycle. Midterm targets point to $7.50 in the 1.618 Fibonacci extension zone before longer-term objectives. The monthly RSI shows extreme compression that Gambardello describes as “screaming for a macro breakout to the upside.” This momentum oscillator behavior typically precedes major price movements in the crypto market. SUI crypto risk model currently sits at 51 and matches pre-bull market levels seen in coins like Ethereum. Gambardello compared this to Ethereum’s December 2020 reading of 51 before its major breakout. The March 2017 Ethereum reading of 53 preceded that cycle’s parabolic move. The analyst also noted that SUI price trades near the same levels from almost a year ago in November 2024. Bollinger Bands Signal Historic Compression CryptoBullet has identified the tightest Bollinger Bands in SUI’s entire trading history on the weekly chart. The BBW indicator compression reached levels that were historically followed by major price movements. This setup mirrors conditions before SUI’s previous major rallies. Historical data shows SUI price delivered +253% gains between December 2023 and March 2024 following similar compression. SUI…
Share
2025/09/18 11:32