The post Can Drug Users Now Own Firearms? Supreme Court Takes Up Major New Gun Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Supreme Court will decide whether people addicted to “controlled substances” can own firearms, as justices announced Monday they will consider whether federal rules that prohibit drug users from owning guns violate the Second Amendment. Gun safety advocates rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on December 2, 2019 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear oral arguments in U.S. v. Ali Danial Hemeni, which asks the court to determine whether the federal statute restricting firearm use for drug users violates the Second Amendment. Hemeni, a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen who is accused of using and dealing drugs, was indicted after the FBI searched his home and found firearms, but federal judges then sided with Hemeni when he argued the charges violated the Second Amendment. Federal law prohibits people from possessing firearms if they’re “an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.” The Trump administration—despite broadly supporting gun rights—argued to the Supreme Court that the court ruling in Hemeni’s favor should be overturned, writing the law barring drug users from owning guns is a “narrow circumstance” in which the Second Amendment can be restricted. The law only “imposes a limited, inherently temporary restriction” on people because they can own firearms again once they’ve recovered from a drug addiction, the government argued, also claiming the restrictions are in line with past historical rules that put restrictions on “habitual drunkards.” Hemeni argued the Supreme Court shouldn’t take up the case, claiming an appeals court ruling in his favor was narrowly tailored to his own specific case and didn’t invalidate the law entirely. What To Watch For The Supreme Court hasn’t given any indication yet when it will hear oral arguments in the case, but the case will be heard and a… The post Can Drug Users Now Own Firearms? Supreme Court Takes Up Major New Gun Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Supreme Court will decide whether people addicted to “controlled substances” can own firearms, as justices announced Monday they will consider whether federal rules that prohibit drug users from owning guns violate the Second Amendment. Gun safety advocates rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on December 2, 2019 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear oral arguments in U.S. v. Ali Danial Hemeni, which asks the court to determine whether the federal statute restricting firearm use for drug users violates the Second Amendment. Hemeni, a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen who is accused of using and dealing drugs, was indicted after the FBI searched his home and found firearms, but federal judges then sided with Hemeni when he argued the charges violated the Second Amendment. Federal law prohibits people from possessing firearms if they’re “an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.” The Trump administration—despite broadly supporting gun rights—argued to the Supreme Court that the court ruling in Hemeni’s favor should be overturned, writing the law barring drug users from owning guns is a “narrow circumstance” in which the Second Amendment can be restricted. The law only “imposes a limited, inherently temporary restriction” on people because they can own firearms again once they’ve recovered from a drug addiction, the government argued, also claiming the restrictions are in line with past historical rules that put restrictions on “habitual drunkards.” Hemeni argued the Supreme Court shouldn’t take up the case, claiming an appeals court ruling in his favor was narrowly tailored to his own specific case and didn’t invalidate the law entirely. What To Watch For The Supreme Court hasn’t given any indication yet when it will hear oral arguments in the case, but the case will be heard and a…

Can Drug Users Now Own Firearms? Supreme Court Takes Up Major New Gun Case

2025/10/21 01:53

Topline

The Supreme Court will decide whether people addicted to “controlled substances” can own firearms, as justices announced Monday they will consider whether federal rules that prohibit drug users from owning guns violate the Second Amendment.

Gun safety advocates rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on December 2, 2019 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images

Key Facts

The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear oral arguments in U.S. v. Ali Danial Hemeni, which asks the court to determine whether the federal statute restricting firearm use for drug users violates the Second Amendment.

Hemeni, a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen who is accused of using and dealing drugs, was indicted after the FBI searched his home and found firearms, but federal judges then sided with Hemeni when he argued the charges violated the Second Amendment.

Federal law prohibits people from possessing firearms if they’re “an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.”

The Trump administration—despite broadly supporting gun rights—argued to the Supreme Court that the court ruling in Hemeni’s favor should be overturned, writing the law barring drug users from owning guns is a “narrow circumstance” in which the Second Amendment can be restricted.

The law only “imposes a limited, inherently temporary restriction” on people because they can own firearms again once they’ve recovered from a drug addiction, the government argued, also claiming the restrictions are in line with past historical rules that put restrictions on “habitual drunkards.”

Hemeni argued the Supreme Court shouldn’t take up the case, claiming an appeals court ruling in his favor was narrowly tailored to his own specific case and didn’t invalidate the law entirely.

What To Watch For

The Supreme Court hasn’t given any indication yet when it will hear oral arguments in the case, but the case will be heard and a ruling will be issued sometime before the court’s term ends in late June 2026.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/10/20/supreme-court-will-consider-overturning-federal-ban-on-drug-users-owning-guns/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

What the U.S. shutdown tells us about market resilience

What the U.S. shutdown tells us about market resilience

The post What the U.S. shutdown tells us about market resilience appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. During the U.S. federal government shutdown that began on October 1, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) went into contingency staffing mode. Almost a hundred crypto ETF decisions got stuck in approval limbo as a result, and key economic-data releases from agencies such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau were paused. For crypto, that blackout became an unscripted stress test, as the industry suddenly lost its usual regulatory support elements. And given that the crypto market often prides itself on being decentralized and self-sufficient, this is a moment of truth where it can prove that claim. How do crypto traders, exchanges, and issuers perform when oversight suddenly vanishes? Let’s take a look. What Actually Pauses in a U.S. Shutdown: ETF and token-filing reviews: Routine processing of ETF and token registration documents is largely suspended, as reflected by the SEC announcement. Issuer communications: Many correspondence channels between the SEC and registrants are inactive during the shutdown. Federal data releases: Reports such as jobs, inflation, and trade data are delayed, per Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics notices prior to the shutdown. A Pause in Oversight, Not in Action The shutdown didn’t just stop new rules; it halted everything that gives the market structure and visibility. And with enforcement activity slowing to a crawl, that leaves crypto issuers, exchanges, and traders navigating the silence on their own terms. For issuers, it’s an exercise in patience. There’s nothing to do but wait. Projects with pending ETF or token applications simply can’t move forward, no matter how ready they may be. Bureaucratic timeouts don’t discriminate — they hit all momentum equally. Exchanges, meanwhile, are keeping steady. The more experienced ones understand that running smoothly during a regulatory blackout is the best insurance policy. If anything goes wrong…
Share
2025/10/26 12:03