Author: hitesh.eth , Crypto KOL Compiled by Felix, PANews This article delves into Bittensor, explaining why it is not a decentralized OpenAI, but rather a decentralized AI economy; it also explains how dTAO reshapes incentive mechanism design, how subnet economies work, and why TAO represents a cultural resistance to centralized AI. What changed after dTAO? Many may be wondering what Bittensor is trying to achieve. Is it trying to create a decentralized OpenAI, or is there something deeper at play? In fact, the crypto community generally believed that it could be a decentralized OpenAI, but confusion arose when it removed subnet restrictions and introduced the dTAO (which also involved subnet tokens) to make it more competitive. This shift was crucial because it shifted the network's reward distribution from centralized voting by a small number of validators to a fully market-driven system. The introduction of dynamic TAOs (dTAOs) fundamentally changed the ecosystem's operating mechanisms. The allocation of daily TAO issuance shifted entirely from the root validator (Subnet 0, which critics called an oligarchic voting system) to the market price of each subnet's alpha token. Each mining subnet received its own alpha (α) token and its own automated market maker (AMM) pool. This enabled each subnet to develop an independent, capital-driven economy. Staking shifted from delegating TAOs to a single validator (Subnet 0 staking) to purchasing and staking subnet-specific alpha tokens (α). Stakers now bear market risk but can directly influence resource allocation. The previously rigid 50/50 reward split between miners and validators evolved to the current 41/41/18 split to better fund subnet owners (18%) and encourage continued innovation in the subnet's core incentive mechanisms. Grand Vision Today, Bittensor competes with centralized AI development and distribution platforms, providing developers with the infrastructure to build diverse AI use cases across various industries. This is crucial to understanding Bittensor's total addressable market (TAM). While companies like OpenAI compete in the multi-billion dollar immediate market, selling finished AI products like subscriptions or API access, Bittensor targets the multi-trillion dollar market for the entire AI value chain—including computing infrastructure, data validation, model training, and the peer-reviewed intelligence layer. If successful, Bittensor, as the foundational, permissionless platform for all decentralized AI, will have a TAM far exceeding that of any single proprietary AI company. Bittensor is developing and deploying diverse AI models, building a coordination engine for a distributed and decentralized AI ecosystem while simultaneously incentivizing the provision of funding and computing resources to achieve the highest levels of quality, efficiency, and trust in outcomes across decentralized AI projects for diverse use cases. This is more like building a decentralized AI value chain in which anyone can participate with capital, knowledge, and computing power. Bittensor is for everyone, not just the 0.000001% of the world who can participate in OpenAI. Bittensor's overall vision is to build a neural internet. Over the past four years, Bittensor has built a loyal community that brings together top VCs like DCG, crypto researchers like Sami Kasab, and many talented people who work every day to advance this vision. They create content, do podcasts, develop products, and are starting a movement. Bittensor has also built a subnet ecosystem, with approximately 126 subnets currently active. The current cost of a subnet is approximately 1,600 TAOs ($640,000 USD), and this cost is dynamic and will change based on the frequency of new subnet registrations. After a few months of suspension, new subnet registrations are now open again. Grayscale, founded in 2013 by Barry Silbert, one of the earliest Bitcoin pioneers, aimed to attract institutional investors to Bitcoin. Now, Grayscale is creating a similar fund for subnet tokens. The fund, called the Yuma Subnet Composite Fund, will invest in the top subnet tokens by market capitalization. Subnet Tokens Subnet tokens are currently one of the most overlooked assets on crypto Twitter. 99% of users are completely unaware of this space. The core concept behind subnet token prices is that they are denominated in TAO, rather than simply pegged, and are determined by the liquidity ratio in their automated market maker (AMM) pools. The higher the value of a subnet token relative to TAO, the more it is issued. More issuance attracts more miners to host and run AI models and provide computing resources. Miners compete to optimize the output of subnet models, and better results lead to higher prices. More precisely, better service attracts more staking demand, which drives up prices, ensuring the overall output quality of AI models used in different subnets for different use cases. Validators ensure that miners maintain quality. Their job is to verify the miners' work and assign a score to it. Based on this score, the miners receive issuance from the subnet. Approximately 7,200 TAOs are issued daily, and this number will be halved over the next two months, with the first Bittensor halving event in December. This means there's currently intense competition within the mining ecosystem for the highest returns. Most miners will stick to mining on the best-performing subnets, and if they mine on top subnets, the price of those subnet tokens will rise accordingly. Increased mining demand driven by high issuance always leads to higher subnet token prices. Initial demand for mining on a subnet often comes from speculation about the use case it's building, the team behind it, its track record, and the backing of a major corporation. Currently, the top subnet tokens with the highest issuance volume include Chutes, Ridges, and Gradient. Some of these subnets are also venture-backed. For example, Gradient is building the AI Trains platform. It was built by Rayon Labs, which also operates Chutes, the leading subnet by issuance volume. Many of these subnets are collaborating with each other to exchange services. For example, Ridges is a Chutes client; Sportstensor is building AI models for sports betting and prediction; and there are subnets like OpenKaito, which powers Kaito's InfoFi Pioneer. Taofi is also part of Bittensor. They have launched a DEX that allows you to easily bridge and exchange subnet tokens from the Base network. Trust TAO If you're asking which subnet tokens will attract demand, you need to track the growth of the subnet token's price relative to TAO. The more growth you see over different timeframes, the higher the demand. Then, you need to look at the ADR (alpha distribution ratio). It should be less than 1, as token withdrawals are now permitted. The worst-performing subnets are withdrawn weekly. If the ADR ratio is above 1, the community may lose a portion of the value of the TAO collateral staked to acquire that token due to the liquidation discount upon withdrawal. You can also track staking pools for different subnets. The more TAO is staked to acquire subnet tokens, the more likely the price will rise. Therefore, the value of subnet tokens depends largely on how long they can maintain high issuance. If they maintain high issuance and the businesses surrounding the subnet generate revenue from the services and products they provide, the price of the subnet token is likely to continue to rise. The overall market capitalization growth surrounding the subnet will directly drive TAO price increases. However, it's recommended to stay away from things you don't understand. Subnet tokens aren't like your average altcoin or junk coin. They require a deeper logical understanding, so if you believe in their vision, invest in TAO. TAO isn't meant to be traded, but rather a cultural symbol against AI centralization. The question isn’t whether decentralized AI will exist, but who will own it. Bittensor has made its choice, and others will too. Related Reading: Bittensor Subnet Investment Guide: Seizing the Next AI TrendAuthor: hitesh.eth , Crypto KOL Compiled by Felix, PANews This article delves into Bittensor, explaining why it is not a decentralized OpenAI, but rather a decentralized AI economy; it also explains how dTAO reshapes incentive mechanism design, how subnet economies work, and why TAO represents a cultural resistance to centralized AI. What changed after dTAO? Many may be wondering what Bittensor is trying to achieve. Is it trying to create a decentralized OpenAI, or is there something deeper at play? In fact, the crypto community generally believed that it could be a decentralized OpenAI, but confusion arose when it removed subnet restrictions and introduced the dTAO (which also involved subnet tokens) to make it more competitive. This shift was crucial because it shifted the network's reward distribution from centralized voting by a small number of validators to a fully market-driven system. The introduction of dynamic TAOs (dTAOs) fundamentally changed the ecosystem's operating mechanisms. The allocation of daily TAO issuance shifted entirely from the root validator (Subnet 0, which critics called an oligarchic voting system) to the market price of each subnet's alpha token. Each mining subnet received its own alpha (α) token and its own automated market maker (AMM) pool. This enabled each subnet to develop an independent, capital-driven economy. Staking shifted from delegating TAOs to a single validator (Subnet 0 staking) to purchasing and staking subnet-specific alpha tokens (α). Stakers now bear market risk but can directly influence resource allocation. The previously rigid 50/50 reward split between miners and validators evolved to the current 41/41/18 split to better fund subnet owners (18%) and encourage continued innovation in the subnet's core incentive mechanisms. Grand Vision Today, Bittensor competes with centralized AI development and distribution platforms, providing developers with the infrastructure to build diverse AI use cases across various industries. This is crucial to understanding Bittensor's total addressable market (TAM). While companies like OpenAI compete in the multi-billion dollar immediate market, selling finished AI products like subscriptions or API access, Bittensor targets the multi-trillion dollar market for the entire AI value chain—including computing infrastructure, data validation, model training, and the peer-reviewed intelligence layer. If successful, Bittensor, as the foundational, permissionless platform for all decentralized AI, will have a TAM far exceeding that of any single proprietary AI company. Bittensor is developing and deploying diverse AI models, building a coordination engine for a distributed and decentralized AI ecosystem while simultaneously incentivizing the provision of funding and computing resources to achieve the highest levels of quality, efficiency, and trust in outcomes across decentralized AI projects for diverse use cases. This is more like building a decentralized AI value chain in which anyone can participate with capital, knowledge, and computing power. Bittensor is for everyone, not just the 0.000001% of the world who can participate in OpenAI. Bittensor's overall vision is to build a neural internet. Over the past four years, Bittensor has built a loyal community that brings together top VCs like DCG, crypto researchers like Sami Kasab, and many talented people who work every day to advance this vision. They create content, do podcasts, develop products, and are starting a movement. Bittensor has also built a subnet ecosystem, with approximately 126 subnets currently active. The current cost of a subnet is approximately 1,600 TAOs ($640,000 USD), and this cost is dynamic and will change based on the frequency of new subnet registrations. After a few months of suspension, new subnet registrations are now open again. Grayscale, founded in 2013 by Barry Silbert, one of the earliest Bitcoin pioneers, aimed to attract institutional investors to Bitcoin. Now, Grayscale is creating a similar fund for subnet tokens. The fund, called the Yuma Subnet Composite Fund, will invest in the top subnet tokens by market capitalization. Subnet Tokens Subnet tokens are currently one of the most overlooked assets on crypto Twitter. 99% of users are completely unaware of this space. The core concept behind subnet token prices is that they are denominated in TAO, rather than simply pegged, and are determined by the liquidity ratio in their automated market maker (AMM) pools. The higher the value of a subnet token relative to TAO, the more it is issued. More issuance attracts more miners to host and run AI models and provide computing resources. Miners compete to optimize the output of subnet models, and better results lead to higher prices. More precisely, better service attracts more staking demand, which drives up prices, ensuring the overall output quality of AI models used in different subnets for different use cases. Validators ensure that miners maintain quality. Their job is to verify the miners' work and assign a score to it. Based on this score, the miners receive issuance from the subnet. Approximately 7,200 TAOs are issued daily, and this number will be halved over the next two months, with the first Bittensor halving event in December. This means there's currently intense competition within the mining ecosystem for the highest returns. Most miners will stick to mining on the best-performing subnets, and if they mine on top subnets, the price of those subnet tokens will rise accordingly. Increased mining demand driven by high issuance always leads to higher subnet token prices. Initial demand for mining on a subnet often comes from speculation about the use case it's building, the team behind it, its track record, and the backing of a major corporation. Currently, the top subnet tokens with the highest issuance volume include Chutes, Ridges, and Gradient. Some of these subnets are also venture-backed. For example, Gradient is building the AI Trains platform. It was built by Rayon Labs, which also operates Chutes, the leading subnet by issuance volume. Many of these subnets are collaborating with each other to exchange services. For example, Ridges is a Chutes client; Sportstensor is building AI models for sports betting and prediction; and there are subnets like OpenKaito, which powers Kaito's InfoFi Pioneer. Taofi is also part of Bittensor. They have launched a DEX that allows you to easily bridge and exchange subnet tokens from the Base network. Trust TAO If you're asking which subnet tokens will attract demand, you need to track the growth of the subnet token's price relative to TAO. The more growth you see over different timeframes, the higher the demand. Then, you need to look at the ADR (alpha distribution ratio). It should be less than 1, as token withdrawals are now permitted. The worst-performing subnets are withdrawn weekly. If the ADR ratio is above 1, the community may lose a portion of the value of the TAO collateral staked to acquire that token due to the liquidation discount upon withdrawal. You can also track staking pools for different subnets. The more TAO is staked to acquire subnet tokens, the more likely the price will rise. Therefore, the value of subnet tokens depends largely on how long they can maintain high issuance. If they maintain high issuance and the businesses surrounding the subnet generate revenue from the services and products they provide, the price of the subnet token is likely to continue to rise. The overall market capitalization growth surrounding the subnet will directly drive TAO price increases. However, it's recommended to stay away from things you don't understand. Subnet tokens aren't like your average altcoin or junk coin. They require a deeper logical understanding, so if you believe in their vision, invest in TAO. TAO isn't meant to be traded, but rather a cultural symbol against AI centralization. The question isn’t whether decentralized AI will exist, but who will own it. Bittensor has made its choice, and others will too. Related Reading: Bittensor Subnet Investment Guide: Seizing the Next AI Trend

Bittensor (TAO) Explained: A Trillion-Dollar Market Opportunity

2025/10/14 10:56

Author: hitesh.eth , Crypto KOL

Compiled by Felix, PANews

This article delves into Bittensor, explaining why it is not a decentralized OpenAI, but rather a decentralized AI economy; it also explains how dTAO reshapes incentive mechanism design, how subnet economies work, and why TAO represents a cultural resistance to centralized AI.

What changed after dTAO?

Many may be wondering what Bittensor is trying to achieve. Is it trying to create a decentralized OpenAI, or is there something deeper at play? In fact, the crypto community generally believed that it could be a decentralized OpenAI, but confusion arose when it removed subnet restrictions and introduced the dTAO (which also involved subnet tokens) to make it more competitive. This shift was crucial because it shifted the network's reward distribution from centralized voting by a small number of validators to a fully market-driven system.

The introduction of dynamic TAOs (dTAOs) fundamentally changed the ecosystem's operating mechanisms. The allocation of daily TAO issuance shifted entirely from the root validator (Subnet 0, which critics called an oligarchic voting system) to the market price of each subnet's alpha token. Each mining subnet received its own alpha (α) token and its own automated market maker (AMM) pool. This enabled each subnet to develop an independent, capital-driven economy. Staking shifted from delegating TAOs to a single validator (Subnet 0 staking) to purchasing and staking subnet-specific alpha tokens (α). Stakers now bear market risk but can directly influence resource allocation. The previously rigid 50/50 reward split between miners and validators evolved to the current 41/41/18 split to better fund subnet owners (18%) and encourage continued innovation in the subnet's core incentive mechanisms.

Grand Vision

Today, Bittensor competes with centralized AI development and distribution platforms, providing developers with the infrastructure to build diverse AI use cases across various industries. This is crucial to understanding Bittensor's total addressable market (TAM). While companies like OpenAI compete in the multi-billion dollar immediate market, selling finished AI products like subscriptions or API access, Bittensor targets the multi-trillion dollar market for the entire AI value chain—including computing infrastructure, data validation, model training, and the peer-reviewed intelligence layer.

If successful, Bittensor, as the foundational, permissionless platform for all decentralized AI, will have a TAM far exceeding that of any single proprietary AI company. Bittensor is developing and deploying diverse AI models, building a coordination engine for a distributed and decentralized AI ecosystem while simultaneously incentivizing the provision of funding and computing resources to achieve the highest levels of quality, efficiency, and trust in outcomes across decentralized AI projects for diverse use cases. This is more like building a decentralized AI value chain in which anyone can participate with capital, knowledge, and computing power.

Bittensor is for everyone, not just the 0.000001% of the world who can participate in OpenAI.

Bittensor's overall vision is to build a neural internet. Over the past four years, Bittensor has built a loyal community that brings together top VCs like DCG, crypto researchers like Sami Kasab, and many talented people who work every day to advance this vision. They create content, do podcasts, develop products, and are starting a movement. Bittensor has also built a subnet ecosystem, with approximately 126 subnets currently active. The current cost of a subnet is approximately 1,600 TAOs ($640,000 USD), and this cost is dynamic and will change based on the frequency of new subnet registrations. After a few months of suspension, new subnet registrations are now open again.

Grayscale, founded in 2013 by Barry Silbert, one of the earliest Bitcoin pioneers, aimed to attract institutional investors to Bitcoin. Now, Grayscale is creating a similar fund for subnet tokens. The fund, called the Yuma Subnet Composite Fund, will invest in the top subnet tokens by market capitalization.

Subnet Tokens

Subnet tokens are currently one of the most overlooked assets on crypto Twitter. 99% of users are completely unaware of this space. The core concept behind subnet token prices is that they are denominated in TAO, rather than simply pegged, and are determined by the liquidity ratio in their automated market maker (AMM) pools. The higher the value of a subnet token relative to TAO, the more it is issued. More issuance attracts more miners to host and run AI models and provide computing resources. Miners compete to optimize the output of subnet models, and better results lead to higher prices. More precisely, better service attracts more staking demand, which drives up prices, ensuring the overall output quality of AI models used in different subnets for different use cases. Validators ensure that miners maintain quality.

Their job is to verify the miners' work and assign a score to it. Based on this score, the miners receive issuance from the subnet. Approximately 7,200 TAOs are issued daily, and this number will be halved over the next two months, with the first Bittensor halving event in December.

This means there's currently intense competition within the mining ecosystem for the highest returns. Most miners will stick to mining on the best-performing subnets, and if they mine on top subnets, the price of those subnet tokens will rise accordingly. Increased mining demand driven by high issuance always leads to higher subnet token prices. Initial demand for mining on a subnet often comes from speculation about the use case it's building, the team behind it, its track record, and the backing of a major corporation.

Currently, the top subnet tokens with the highest issuance volume include Chutes, Ridges, and Gradient. Some of these subnets are also venture-backed. For example, Gradient is building the AI Trains platform. It was built by Rayon Labs, which also operates Chutes, the leading subnet by issuance volume. Many of these subnets are collaborating with each other to exchange services. For example, Ridges is a Chutes client; Sportstensor is building AI models for sports betting and prediction; and there are subnets like OpenKaito, which powers Kaito's InfoFi Pioneer. Taofi is also part of Bittensor. They have launched a DEX that allows you to easily bridge and exchange subnet tokens from the Base network.

Trust TAO

If you're asking which subnet tokens will attract demand, you need to track the growth of the subnet token's price relative to TAO. The more growth you see over different timeframes, the higher the demand. Then, you need to look at the ADR (alpha distribution ratio). It should be less than 1, as token withdrawals are now permitted. The worst-performing subnets are withdrawn weekly. If the ADR ratio is above 1, the community may lose a portion of the value of the TAO collateral staked to acquire that token due to the liquidation discount upon withdrawal.

You can also track staking pools for different subnets. The more TAO is staked to acquire subnet tokens, the more likely the price will rise. Therefore, the value of subnet tokens depends largely on how long they can maintain high issuance. If they maintain high issuance and the businesses surrounding the subnet generate revenue from the services and products they provide, the price of the subnet token is likely to continue to rise. The overall market capitalization growth surrounding the subnet will directly drive TAO price increases.

However, it's recommended to stay away from things you don't understand. Subnet tokens aren't like your average altcoin or junk coin. They require a deeper logical understanding, so if you believe in their vision, invest in TAO. TAO isn't meant to be traded, but rather a cultural symbol against AI centralization.

The question isn’t whether decentralized AI will exist, but who will own it. Bittensor has made its choice, and others will too.

Related Reading: Bittensor Subnet Investment Guide: Seizing the Next AI Trend

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Share
New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together

New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together

The post New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stephen Miran, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and US Federal Reserve governor nominee for US President Donald Trump, arrives for a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, Sept. 4, 2025. The Senate Banking Committee’s examination of Stephen Miran’s appointment will provide the first extended look at how prominent Republican senators balance their long-standing support of an independent central bank against loyalty to their party leader. Photographer: Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images Daniel Heuer | Bloomberg | Getty Images Newly-confirmed Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran dissented from the central bank’s decision to lower the federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point on Wednesday, choosing instead to call for a half-point cut. Miran, who was confirmed by the Senate to the Fed Board of Governors on Monday, was the sole dissenter in the Federal Open Market Committee’s statement. Governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, who had dissented at the Fed’s prior meeting in favor of a quarter-point move, were aligned with Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the others besides Miran this time. Miran was selected by Trump back in August to fill the seat that was vacated by former Governor Adriana Kugler after she suddenly announced her resignation without stating a reason for doing so. He has said that he will take an unpaid leave of absence as chair of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors rather than fully resign from the position. Miran’s place on the board, which will last until Jan. 31, 2026 when Kugler’s term was due to end, has been viewed by critics as a threat from Trump to the Fed’s independence, as the president has nominated three of the seven members. Trump also said in August that he had fired Federal Reserve Board Governor…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:26
Share