Bitcoin ETFs have continued to receive more inflows compared to Ethereum ETFs despite a steady investor interest in Ethereum.Bitcoin ETFs have continued to receive more inflows compared to Ethereum ETFs despite a steady investor interest in Ethereum.

Bitcoin ETFs dominate inflows with $146B AUM, reinforcing BTC’s 59% market share

2025/10/24 01:18

Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have maintained a lead over Ethereum ETFs in terms of capital inflows. The lead has reinforced Bitcoin’s dominance across the crypto landscape with roughly 59% over Ethereums 12%. 

Despite steady interest from institutional investors in Ethereum assets, Bitcoin continues to receive more inflows into its ETF products, currently leading with over $146 billion in total net assets, compared to Ethereum’s approximately $25 billion in total net assets. 

BTC market dominance stands at 59% as it leads in ETF inflows

Following weeks of solid inflows from the beginning of this month, which saw Bitcoin Spot ETFs record up to $197.8 million in cumulative net inflows on October 9, the U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETF has recorded a net outflow of $101.29 million today. Still, the cumulative net inflow remains positive, with $61.87 billion as of today, based on SoSoValue data.

Source: CoinMarketCap; Bitcoin dominance over time

Bitcoin’s dominance has been reinforced this year, with over 59.3% of the market share today, compared to 12.6% for Ethereum and 28.1% for the rest of the cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin briefly lost its dominance to the rest of the crypto markets in 2018 and 2022, when it faced bearish moments, shedding its dominance to an average of 35% during both periods.

BTC has, however, peaked ever since the bearish momentum in 2022, reaching new all-time highs. Currently, BTC is up 1.43% at $109,603.90 at the time of publication, with trading volumes exceeding $64 billion and a market cap of $2.18 trillion, reflecting continued institutional engagement. 

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust leads in inflows today with $73.63 million, pushing its dominance against Fidelity’s FBTC and Grayscale’s GBTC ETFs. Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has recorded a net outflow of $56.56 million today, alongside Grayscale’s GBTC, which has a net outflow of $56.63 million. However, the cumulative net inflow for U.S. BTC ETFs remains positive at $61.87 billion. 

The strong momentum across BTC ETFs and its dominance comes as the token trades near all-time highs realized at the beginning of this month at $126,198.07, according to CoinMarketCap data

Institutional flows pivot to Bitcoin after brief Ethereum ETF surge in July

Ethereum ETFs briefly matched BTC inflows in July, but that trend has already shifted towards BTC. In July, Ethereum ETFs recorded more than $1.8 billion in inflows in a single week compared to BTC’s $70 million during the same period. CryptoRank analysis reveals that spot Ethereum ETFs recorded a combined $15 billion in net inflows, compared to roughly $40 billion for BTC, between April 2024 and October 2025.

Source: CryptoRank; Combined cumulative inflows for ETH and BTC since April 2024

U.S. Spot Ethereum ETFs recorded a daily net outflow of 18.77 million today based on SoSoValue data. Still, the cumulative total net inflow remains positive at $14.57 billion, which is relatively low compared to BTC’s $61.87 billion. BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) is the only fund that recorded positive flows, adding $110.71 million, compared to the other two dominant ETFs. Grayscale’s ETHE recorded an outflow of $33.46 million while Fidelity’s FETH saw $49.46 million leave the trust fund. 

The momentum in August saw Ethereum ETFs rise, with total net assets increasing to $29.9 billion, and daily trading volumes surging to $41 billion. The total net asset has, however, reduced this month to $25.81 billion. Based on Farside data, the trend ended around October 9 when Ethereum ETFs began to experience consecutive outflows, signaling a near-term cooling in investor activity. 

At the time of publication, Ethereum was trading at $3,867.46, representing a 7.71% drop over the past month anda  2.5% drop this week. Despite the drop, the token remains an actively traded cryptocurrency, with $41.79 billion in trading volumes over the past 24 hours and a 12.6% market dominance.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
2025/09/18 00:09
Share