Emails reveal some of the most notorious organizers backing President Donald Trump’s plan to militarize US soil were Chistian nationalists comprising the controversialEmails reveal some of the most notorious organizers backing President Donald Trump’s plan to militarize US soil were Chistian nationalists comprising the controversial

Behind the shadowy network pushing Trump to deploy the military domestically

2026/03/11 09:27
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Emails reveal some of the most notorious organizers backing President Donald Trump’s plan to militarize US soil were Chistian nationalists comprising the controversial Project 2025, according to the Phoenix New Times.

Writer Beau Hodai called the Border Security Workgroup’s meeting the “insurrectionist brunch,” and it went down before the 2024 election, when a cadre of MAGA enthusiasts plotted ways to use the military domestically.

“Emails show there were more Project 2025 brunches at the Army Navy Country Club, and the group also received continued guidance from Project 2025 leadership … relating to this ongoing guidance and development of hybrid military/domestic law enforcement plans,” reported Hodai. “… To be very clear: Documentation shows that the group envisioned … militarized ‘border security’ operations taking place in all 50 states, not just at the border.”

“Many leading contributors to the project were unabashedly Christian nationalist, and entities of the anti-immigrant network founded by white nationalist John Tanton were among the project’s leading contributors,” said Hodai. “An examination of groups and the individuals involved in the world of Project 2025 also reveals a deep culture of anti-democratic actors who have long worked to restrict voter access, and/or have taken part in efforts to overthrow elections and undermine election systems. As such, Project 2025 was a synthesis of these pernicious threads of Christian nationalism, white nationalism and those who would seek to seize political power — seemingly at any cost.”

In 2024, current and former Trump advisor Jeffrey Bossert Clark was already urging participants to “become experts” on sections of federal law codified under the Insurrection Act and to “bone up on Section 253 of the Insurrection Act,” which states that “the President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.”

“A draft policy paper produced by the group toward the end of 2024 recommended plans to facilitate the deployment of up to one million Army soldiers … on American soil, noting that the president would need to declare an emergency to initiate such a deployment,” said Hodai. “Trump did just that soon after taking office, allowing him to deploy troops at the border, and he has threatened, attempted or executed military deployments to a number of cities.”

According to emails and reports, The Border Security Workgroup also contemplated “counter-intelligence” work to combat “insider threats” working “to subvert the President’s plan.”

“Records show the group considered using a variety of means to target a number of different groups, including certain non-governmental organizations, government agencies, judicial districts and a number of states or cities governed by the Democratic Party,” said Hodai. “They also contemplated targeting college students who were protesting Israel’s actions in Gaza. In a July 2024 email, group member Collin Agee — the “senior Army operations advisor” to the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency — railed against immigrants who, “under the guise of free speech,” protested against Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza.

Members of the work group have filed out in different directions inside the Trump administration, and many of the group's policies have been implemented in Trump’s first year in office.

“While many things called for by the Border Security Workgroup have transpired, events that have unfolded during this Trump term have not perfectly mirrored its plans,” said Hodai. “The Trump administration’s many overreaches have prompted spirited and vociferous pushback. Several states, including California, have successfully blocked Trump’s domestic military ambitions in the courts. Trump’s ‘surges’ of thuggish masked immigration agents to Democratic-led cities — which have resulted in the shooting deaths of two American citizens — have sparked a backlash that has tanked Republicans’ approval numbers and resulted, at least for now, in a drawdown of those hamfisted deployments.”

But Trump and his faithful are persistent opportunists, said Hodai.

“They’ve persevered despite adverse court rulings and other impediments. It stands to reason that they’ll continue to grab for as much power as they can before what appears to be an inevitable vivisection in the 2026 midterms,” he said
  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$2.858
$2.858$2.858
-2.59%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

Uniswap trades at $3.88 with neutral RSI at 51.98. Technical analysis suggests potential breakout to $4.17 upper Bollinger Band, with bullish targets reaching $
Share
BlockChain News2026/03/12 17:21
Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Integrating AI into applications is a balancing act between performance, cost, and intelligence. Traditionally, high-performance AI models come with steep costs
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 16:55