The post $27M Gone in Seconds: Venus Protocol User Hit by Phishing Attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Rumors spread fast in crypto. Yesterday, whispers of an exploit on Venus Protocol sent shockwaves across X. At first, some thought the lending protocol itself had been breached. But hours of joint analysis cleared the air, Venus wasn’t hacked. Instead, a phishing attack snared a whale, draining $27 million in assets with one bad transaction. This wasn’t a protocol failure. It was human error. And it’s a stark reminder of DeFi’s biggest weakness: one careless click can wipe out a fortune. The victim approved a malicious transaction from a fake site. That single signature gave the attacker’s burner wallet, 0x7fd8…202a, unlimited access to his tokens. Once approval was granted, the attacker struck instantly. Assets vanished in seconds. According to Cyvers Alerts 🚨ALERT🚨27M suspicious transaction has been detected involving a user of @VenusProtocol on the #BNBChain The user unknowingly approved a malicious transaction, granting token permissions that resulted in the loss of $27M in digital assets. The stolen funds are currently held… pic.twitter.com/WekHEicyec — 🚨 Cyvers Alerts 🚨 (@CyversAlerts) September 2, 2025 And, here’s what got drained: $19.8M vUSDT $7.15M vUSDC $146K vXRP $22K vETH Even 285 BTCB on BNB Chain Generational wealth gone. Just like that. The Wild Part: Venus Was Never Hacked Venus Protocol confirmed on X Update: we are in direct contact with the victim of the phishing attack, and the protocol will remain paused while we try to recover his funds. Venus was not exploited, but we are committed to protecting our users. If the protocol resumes now, the hacker gets the user’s funds. https://t.co/441ncPEbla — Venus Protocol (@VenusProtocol) September 2, 2025 that their contracts were safe. The frontend? Fine. No smart contract vulnerabilities. No code exploits. This was pure social engineering. A fake link, a trusted click, and boom, open approvals did the rest. That’s the… The post $27M Gone in Seconds: Venus Protocol User Hit by Phishing Attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Rumors spread fast in crypto. Yesterday, whispers of an exploit on Venus Protocol sent shockwaves across X. At first, some thought the lending protocol itself had been breached. But hours of joint analysis cleared the air, Venus wasn’t hacked. Instead, a phishing attack snared a whale, draining $27 million in assets with one bad transaction. This wasn’t a protocol failure. It was human error. And it’s a stark reminder of DeFi’s biggest weakness: one careless click can wipe out a fortune. The victim approved a malicious transaction from a fake site. That single signature gave the attacker’s burner wallet, 0x7fd8…202a, unlimited access to his tokens. Once approval was granted, the attacker struck instantly. Assets vanished in seconds. According to Cyvers Alerts 🚨ALERT🚨27M suspicious transaction has been detected involving a user of @VenusProtocol on the #BNBChain The user unknowingly approved a malicious transaction, granting token permissions that resulted in the loss of $27M in digital assets. The stolen funds are currently held… pic.twitter.com/WekHEicyec — 🚨 Cyvers Alerts 🚨 (@CyversAlerts) September 2, 2025 And, here’s what got drained: $19.8M vUSDT $7.15M vUSDC $146K vXRP $22K vETH Even 285 BTCB on BNB Chain Generational wealth gone. Just like that. The Wild Part: Venus Was Never Hacked Venus Protocol confirmed on X Update: we are in direct contact with the victim of the phishing attack, and the protocol will remain paused while we try to recover his funds. Venus was not exploited, but we are committed to protecting our users. If the protocol resumes now, the hacker gets the user’s funds. https://t.co/441ncPEbla — Venus Protocol (@VenusProtocol) September 2, 2025 that their contracts were safe. The frontend? Fine. No smart contract vulnerabilities. No code exploits. This was pure social engineering. A fake link, a trusted click, and boom, open approvals did the rest. That’s the…

$27M Gone in Seconds: Venus Protocol User Hit by Phishing Attack

Rumors spread fast in crypto. Yesterday, whispers of an exploit on Venus Protocol sent shockwaves across X. At first, some thought the lending protocol itself had been breached.

But hours of joint analysis cleared the air, Venus wasn’t hacked. Instead, a phishing attack snared a whale, draining $27 million in assets with one bad transaction.

This wasn’t a protocol failure. It was human error. And it’s a stark reminder of DeFi’s biggest weakness: one careless click can wipe out a fortune.

The victim approved a malicious transaction from a fake site. That single signature gave the attacker’s burner wallet, 0x7fd8…202a, unlimited access to his tokens.

Once approval was granted, the attacker struck instantly. Assets vanished in seconds. According to Cyvers Alerts

And, here’s what got drained:

$19.8M vUSDT

$7.15M vUSDC

$146K vXRP

$22K vETH

Even 285 BTCB on BNB Chain

Generational wealth gone. Just like that.

The Wild Part: Venus Was Never Hacked

Venus Protocol confirmed on X

that their contracts were safe. The frontend? Fine. No smart contract vulnerabilities. No code exploits.

This was pure social engineering. A fake link, a trusted click, and boom, open approvals did the rest.

That’s the dark side of DeFi power. Unlimited token approvals make DeFi seamless and fast. But they also turn every wallet into a ticking time bomb if approvals fall into the wrong hands.

Community Reaction: Shock and Sympathy

Crypto Twitter lit up with reactions. Some expressed sympathy for the whale; others saw it as another warning.

He noted how attackers patiently wait for one careless moment. The phishing link likely circulated for days before the victim clicked.

Venus Protocol has since paused parts of the platform while working directly with the victim. Recovery options remain slim, but efforts are ongoing.

Why Phishing Keeps Winning in DeFi

DeFi removes middlemen. That’s the beauty, and the danger. You hold the keys. You sign the transactions. There’s no customer support if things go wrong.

Phishers exploit this perfectly:

  • Fake sites copy real ones pixel-for-pixel.
  • Twitter bots reply under official announcements with “urgent” links.
  • Unlimited approvals mean attackers only need access once.

In TradFi, banks can reverse fraudulent transfers. In DeFi, blockchain immutability means once assets leave your wallet, they’re gone.

Lessons Learned: How to Stay Safe

The Venus incident highlights simple but critical safety steps:

1. Don’t trust random links. Always type URLs manually or bookmark official sites.

2. Double-check every transaction. Read approvals before signing, infinite token access is risky.

3. Revoke old approvals regularly. Tools like Revoke.cash make it easy.

4. Use hardware wallets. They add a physical confirmation step attackers can’t bypass.

Phishers thrive in bull markets when wallets grow fat. They know greed kills caution. Don’t give them an opening.

The Bigger Picture: Social Engineering vs. Smart Contracts

This attack shows where DeFi risks really lie.

Smart contracts are getting stronger. Protocol exploits, while still happening, are down compared to 2021-22.

Humans, on the other hand, remain the weakest link.

Phishers don’t need to hack code when they can hack trust. A fake MetaMask popup. A Twitter link promising “airdrops.” One moment of distraction can cost millions.

Security experts argue education matters more than new tech here. Wallet UX improvements, clearer approval warnings, and better scam detection could help. But ultimately, self-custody comes with self-responsibility.

Will Funds Be Recovered?

Venus Protocol confirmed communication with the victim. Recovery efforts are on, but realistically, funds drained to attacker-controlled wallets rarely come back.

Sometimes, attackers negotiate for ransom-like returns, but there’s no sign of that yet. The assets may get mixed through bridges and mixers soon, making tracing harder.

Final Thoughts: A Wake-Up Call for DeFi Users

This wasn’t just another exploit headline. It’s a reminder that DeFi security starts with the user.

Protocols can be bulletproof. Audits can pass. But one bad click can still drain millions.

As the bull market heats up, expect more phishing attempts. More fake airdrops. More Twitter bots with urgent links.

  • Don’t be the next headline.
  • Double-check. Revoke often. Stay paranoid.
  • Because in DeFi, you only learn this lesson once.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/27m-gone-in-seconds-venus-protocol-user-hit-by-phishing-attack/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.007006
$0.007006$0.007006
-0.35%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10
SHIB Price Analysis for February 8

SHIB Price Analysis for February 8

The post SHIB Price Analysis for February 8 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Original U.Today article Can traders expect SHIB to test the $0.0000070 range soon
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/09 00:26
Solana’s Long-Term Upside Tied to Upgrades, Short-Term Structure Still Weak

Solana’s Long-Term Upside Tied to Upgrades, Short-Term Structure Still Weak

Solana remains caught between strong long-term fundamentals and a fragile short-term technical structure. While the network’s upgrade roadmap points to meaningful
Share
Coinstats2026/02/09 00:28