XRP_Cro (@stedas), a prominent figure in the crypto community, recently shared an intriguing video featuring former Ripple CTO David Schwartz. In the post, he addressedXRP_Cro (@stedas), a prominent figure in the crypto community, recently shared an intriguing video featuring former Ripple CTO David Schwartz. In the post, he addressed

David Schwartz: No One Has Legal Control Over XRP Ledger

2026/02/11 14:02
3 min read

XRP_Cro (@stedas), a prominent figure in the crypto community, recently shared an intriguing video featuring former Ripple CTO David Schwartz.

In the post, he addressed ongoing claims that XRP is centralized. He argued that labeling XRP as centralized is no longer a product of confusion but willful ignorance.

XRP Ledger Governance

In the video, Schwartz explained why the XRP Ledger operates as a decentralized system. He stated, “The XRP ledger is decentralized because no organization or individual has any legal right or ability to control it.” Every participant enforces the ledger’s rules, and governance arises from the network itself. No single entity can control the system.

This structure differentiates XRP from other digital assets. Schwartz emphasized that control is distributed across all participants. Each node validates transactions independently, ensuring that no one has unilateral authority.

Misconceptions About Centralization

The debate around XRP’s centralization persists despite clear evidence of its decentralized design. Schwartz noted that the ledger’s participants collectively govern the network. All transactions, changes, and rules are enforced by consensus among these participants.

XRP_Cro highlighted this point in his post, drawing attention to the contrast between perception and reality. Many critics continue to misrepresent the ledger’s structure. However, the system’s operational model confirms that XRP’s governance is decentralized in practice, with Schwartz previously stating that XRP is more decentralized than proof-of-work systems.

Community Oversight

Community involvement is central to XRP’s governance. Nodes run by individuals, institutions, and organizations all participate in validating the ledger. This collective oversight reinforces decentralization. It also ensures that changes to the system require broad agreement, not approval from a central party.

Schwartz made it clear that XRP’s design prioritizes decentralization at every level. The network’s rules and enforcement mechanisms operate independently of Ripple as a company. Legal control or operational dominance by any party is not possible.

Clarity for Investors

For investors, understanding the XRP Ledger’s decentralized nature is critical. Mislabeling the asset as centralized can mislead market participants. Schwartz’s statements provide clarity on the technical and governance aspects of XRP. They reinforce confidence in the system’s structure and reliability.

The XRP Ledger remains a decentralized, secure, and fully functional digital asset platform. Misunderstandings about centralization fail to reflect the ledger’s operational reality. As Schwartz emphasized, no one has full control over XRP, and the network continues to function under the consensus of all its participants.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.


Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post David Schwartz: No One Has Legal Control Over XRP Ledger appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.3595
$1.3595$1.3595
-3.38%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shiba Inu Faces Growing Risks as Leadership Instability Concerns Holders

Shiba Inu Faces Growing Risks as Leadership Instability Concerns Holders

TLDR Shiba Inu faces growing risks due to leadership instability and the absence of its lead developer, Shytoshi Kusama. The lack of identifiable leadership raises trust issues, hindering Shiba Inu’s ability to attract institutional investors. Shibarium’s transaction volume has significantly declined, sparking concerns about its ability to support decentralized finance (DeFi) growth. A recent $3 [...] The post Shiba Inu Faces Growing Risks as Leadership Instability Concerns Holders appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 06:14
Vitalik: Staking means defending the blockchain, and there will inevitably be resistance when exiting

Vitalik: Staking means defending the blockchain, and there will inevitably be resistance when exiting

PANews reported on September 18th that in response to the discussion about the waiting time for staking, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said: "Staking means taking on the solemn responsibility of defending the blockchain. Exit resistance is part of the protocol. This is not to say that the current staking queue design is optimal, but to say that if the relevant parameter settings are naively reduced, the credibility of the chain will be greatly reduced from the perspective of those nodes that are not often online." Data from the validatorqueue website shows that as of now, the number of ETH in the Ethereum PoS network exit queue is 2,496,141, with a waiting time of approximately 43 days and 8 hours. During the same period, the number of ETH waiting to be activated is 464,626, with an estimated activation delay of approximately 8 days and 2 hours.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:39
Why PEPE May Become the Most Important Meme Coin of This Cycle

Why PEPE May Become the Most Important Meme Coin of This Cycle

Pepe has moved back into focus during a period when the wider crypto market feels slow and uncertain. Conversation around PEPE price now centers on long-term relevance
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/11 16:00