Binance, OKX, and Dragonfly Clash Over What Really Caused the 1011 Crypto Crash The cryptocurrency industry is once again divided over one of its most disrup Binance, OKX, and Dragonfly Clash Over What Really Caused the 1011 Crypto Crash The cryptocurrency industry is once again divided over one of its most disrup

Binance to Blame for the 1011 Crypto Crash? OKX vs Dragonfly Sparks Industry War

7 min read

Binance, OKX, and Dragonfly Clash Over What Really Caused the 1011 Crypto Crash

The cryptocurrency industry is once again divided over one of its most disruptive market events in recent history: the so-called 1011 crypto crash. Months after billions of dollars in leveraged positions were wiped out in a single day, senior figures from leading exchanges, venture capital firms, and protocol teams are publicly disputing what actually triggered the collapse.

At the center of the debate are executives and investors from OKX, Binance, Dragonfly, and Ethena, each offering sharply different interpretations of how the market unraveled on October 11. The renewed dispute has reignited broader questions about systemic leverage, exchange incentives, product design, and the fragile structure of modern crypto markets.

Despite extensive post-mortems, no single explanation has gained universal acceptance. Instead, the controversy highlights how deeply interconnected — and poorly understood — crypto market mechanics have become.

What Was the 1011 Crypto Crash?

The term “1011 crypto crash” refers to a violent wave of price declines and cascading liquidations that swept through global digital asset markets on October 11. Within hours, billions of dollars in leveraged positions were forcibly closed across major exchanges, triggering extreme volatility across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and a wide range of altcoins.

Source: Wu Blockchain X

Market participants have compared the event to earlier systemic shocks such as Terra-LUNA, Three Arrows Capital, and even the FTX collapse. While the structural damage was different, the speed and scale of the liquidations raised alarms about how quickly risk can propagate through crypto’s always-on, highly leveraged trading environment.

What makes the 1011 crash unusual is that it did not originate from a single protocol failure or bankruptcy announcement. Instead, it appeared to emerge from a complex mix of market panic, technical stress, and feedback loops within exchange infrastructure.

OKX Founder’s Claim: Binance and USDe at the Center

The debate resurfaced publicly after Star Xu, founder and CEO of OKX, posted a detailed critique on January 31 outlining his view of the crash. According to Xu, the root cause was not random panic, but a structural weakness created by how Binance integrated and promoted USDe, a yield-bearing stable asset developed by Ethena.

Xu argued that Binance’s incentive programs encouraged traders to treat USDe as if it were equivalent to traditional stablecoins such as USDT or USDC, despite having a fundamentally different risk profile.

In his view, this created a hidden leverage loop. Traders could convert stablecoins into USDe, borrow against USDe, and then recycle the borrowed funds back into additional USDe exposure. Over time, this loop amplified systemic leverage without being immediately visible in headline metrics.

When market volatility spiked, USDe briefly lost its peg, triggering margin calls and forced liquidations. According to Xu, this sequence turned a manageable market drawdown into a full-scale liquidation cascade.

Xu emphasized that his criticism was not a personal attack on Binance, but a warning about how product design decisions at large platforms can unintentionally destabilize the broader market.

Dragonfly Pushes Back: “The Timeline Doesn’t Match”

Dragonfly Capital partner Haseeb Qureshi strongly rejected Xu’s interpretation, calling it inconsistent with observed market data. In a detailed rebuttal, Qureshi argued that the sequence of events simply does not support the idea that USDe de-pegging caused the crash.

According to Dragonfly’s analysis, Bitcoin had already reached its intraday low roughly 30 minutes before USDe showed meaningful price deviation. This suggests that the broader market downturn preceded, rather than followed, issues with USDe.

Qureshi also noted that while USDe price anomalies were most visible on Binance, liquidations occurred simultaneously across multiple exchanges worldwide. In previous systemic collapses such as Terra or FTX, price dislocations spread uniformly across venues. The 1011 crash, by contrast, showed fragmented behavior, pointing to exchange-level stress rather than a single asset failure.

He further questioned why concerns about USDe were being raised months after the event, given that order book data and liquidation metrics had been publicly available since October.

An Alternative Explanation: Panic, APIs, and Market Fragility

Beyond the dispute over USDe, some analysts argue that the 1011 crash was driven by a convergence of external shocks and technical bottlenecks rather than any one product.

One factor cited is macro-driven panic. At the time of the crash, markets were reacting to renewed geopolitical tension and aggressive tariff rhetoric from former U.S. President Donald Trump, which rattled global risk assets. Unlike traditional markets, crypto trades continuously, allowing fear to cascade rapidly without circuit breakers.

Another key issue raised was exchange infrastructure stress, particularly around application programming interfaces (APIs). During the height of volatility, reports surfaced that Binance’s API experienced disruptions. If market makers were unable to rebalance positions across exchanges, liquidity could evaporate instantly, intensifying price swings.

Automatic deleveraging systems also played a role. When liquidation engines activate simultaneously across venues, they can overwhelm order books, leaving no natural buyers to stabilize prices. In such conditions, even modest selling pressure can spiral into a full-scale collapse.

CZ, Ethena, and the Conflict Question

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) briefly entered the discussion, publicly agreeing with Dragonfly’s timeline analysis before later deleting his post. Ethena founder Guy Young also pushed back against OKX’s claims, arguing that USDe price deviations occurred after broader market stress had already taken hold.

Source: Xpost

Qureshi acknowledged potential conflicts of interest openly. Dragonfly is an investor in Ethena, while both Binance and OKX have commercial relationships with the protocol. He also noted that OKX had previously invested in Dragonfly funds.

Despite these overlapping ties, Qureshi maintained that the disagreement was about factual accuracy, not loyalty.

What Really Caused the 1011 Crypto Crash?

As of now, there is no single explanation that fully accounts for the 1011 crypto crash. Evidence points toward a multifactor failure involving heightened leverage, fragile market structure, technical constraints, and psychological panic — rather than the actions of one exchange or one token.

What the episode ultimately reveals is how sensitive crypto markets remain to feedback loops created by incentives, automation, and always-on trading. When liquidity thins and systems strain, small triggers can produce outsized consequences.

For regulators, exchanges, and traders alike, the lesson is clear: transparency, resilient infrastructure, and cautious product design matter more than ever. Without them, future crashes may not just be possible — they may be inevitable.

hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.


Disclaimer:


The articles published on hokanews are intended to provide up-to-date information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended as an invitation to buy, sell, or invest in any assets. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making any investment or financial decisions.
hokanews is not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from the use of information provided on this site. Investment decisions should be based on thorough research and advice from qualified financial advisors. Information on HokaNews may change without notice, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the content published.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies

‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies

The post ‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Critics have hailed Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another,” starring Leonardo DiCaprio, as a “masterpiece,” indicating potential Academy Awards success as it boasts near-perfect scores on review aggregators Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes based on early reviews. Leonardo DiCaprio stars in “One Battle After Another,” which opens in theaters next week. (Photo by Jeff Spicer/Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures) Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures Key Facts “One Battle After Another” boasts a nearly perfect 97 out of a possible 100 on Metacritic based on its first 31 reviews, making it the highest-rated movie of this decade on Metacritic’s best movies of all time list. The movie also has a 96% score on Rotten Tomatoes based on the first 56 reviews, with only two reviews considered “rotten,” or negative. The Associated Press hailed the movie as “an American masterpiece,” noting the movie touches on topical political themes and depicts a society where “gun violence, white power and immigrant deportations recur in an ongoing dance, both farcical and tragic.” The movie stars DiCaprio as an ex-revolutionary who reunites with former accomplices to rescue his 16-year-old daughter when she goes missing, and Anderson has said the movie was inspired by the 1990 novel, “Vineland.” Most critics have described the movie as an action thriller with notable chase scenes, which jumps in time from DiCaprio’s character’s early days with fictional revolutionary group, the French 75, to about 15 years later, when he is pursued by foe and military leader Captain Steven Lockjaw, played by Sean Penn. The Warner Bros.-produced film was made on a big budget, estimated to be between $130 million and $175 million, and co-stars Penn, Benicio del Toro, Regina Hall and Teyana Taylor. When Will ‘one Battle After Another’ Open In Theaters And Streaming? The move opens in…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:35
Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27
Google and PayPal Team Up to Power Next-Gen Commerce for Billions

Google and PayPal Team Up to Power Next-Gen Commerce for Billions

TLDR: Google and PayPal signed a multiyear partnership to integrate payments across Google platforms and boost digital commerce experiences. PayPal’s checkout, payouts, and Hyperwallet will be embedded into Google products, including Ads, Play, and Cloud services. The partnership uses Google’s AI to create agent-based shopping tools and secure, frictionless payment solutions for users worldwide. PayPal [...] The post Google and PayPal Team Up to Power Next-Gen Commerce for Billions appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/18 16:15