TLDR: Gold dropped nearly 10% and silver 30% as margin hikes forced leveraged liquidations.  Kevin Warsh’s nomination strengthened the US dollar, pressuring metalsTLDR: Gold dropped nearly 10% and silver 30% as margin hikes forced leveraged liquidations.  Kevin Warsh’s nomination strengthened the US dollar, pressuring metals

Silver Dives 30% to $83 While Gold Falls 10% to $4,700 Amid Margin Hikes

TLDR:

  • Gold dropped nearly 10% and silver 30% as margin hikes forced leveraged liquidations. 
  • Kevin Warsh’s nomination strengthened the US dollar, pressuring metals prices sharply. 
  • Silver rebounded 8% after intraday lows, showing oversold conditions correcting. 
  • Market reset removed weak positions, offering opportunities for disciplined investors. 

Gold and silver continue to face sharp volatility. Gold is around $4,665 per ounce, and silver is near $79–$82 per ounce. After facing historic sell‑offs and forced liquidations, both metals remain well below recent record highs. 

The market is responding to heightened margin requirements and a stronger US dollar. Partial rebounds signal oversold conditions that are attracting renewed buying interest. 

Historic Volatility and Margin-Driven Liquidations

Gold and silver experienced extreme price swings, with gold reaching $5,600 and silver $122 before sharply falling. By Monday, gold traded near $4,700, while silver briefly touched $71 intraday, before bouncing into the $83–87 range.

The immediate catalyst was political: Kevin Warsh’s nomination as Federal Reserve Chair signaled tighter monetary policy. Warsh’s hawkish stance strengthened the US dollar, which increased costs for international buyers of precious metals.

Since gold and silver are priced in dollars, the stronger currency immediately suppressed demand, pressuring prices further. However, the main driver was structural leverage in futures markets amplified by abrupt margin increases.

CME Group raised margin requirements 33% for gold and 36% for silver, forcing traders to either provide capital or liquidate positions. Margin allows traders to control large positions with limited capital, but sudden hikes create urgent selling pressure.

Most leveraged traders could not meet requirements, sparking a cascade of forced selling and rapid price declines. Initial liquidations triggered margin calls for other traders, accelerating panic selling in the metals market.


Stop-loss orders were executed automatically, liquidity quickly vanished, and prices gapped lower than any routine correction. Silver dropped nearly 30% intraday, while gold fell close to 10%, showing how leverage amplified volatility far beyond fundamentals.

Recovery and Market Stabilization

By Monday afternoon, silver rebounded roughly 8%, and gold partially recovered, signaling oversold conditions correcting. Buyers returned once forced selling subsided, stabilizing prices and creating a firmer market foundation.

This rebound suggests weaker traders were removed, leaving stronger hands and more controlled trading dynamics. Fundamental factors supporting precious metals remain unchanged, including geopolitical tensions and currency concerns.

Institutional forecasts remain bullish, with gold projected to reach $6,300 by the end of 2026 according to major banks. The volatility event created buying opportunities for patient investors willing to enter markets at lower prices.

Higher margin requirements now reduce the likelihood of repeat forced liquidations in futures markets. This event effectively purged over-leveraged positions, resetting the market on a more stable footing.

Precious metals markets are gradually stabilizing, offering long-term confidence for disciplined investors watching for entry points.

The post Silver Dives 30% to $83 While Gold Falls 10% to $4,700 Amid Margin Hikes appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Trump's team allocated $22.44 million to BitGo via a wallet.

Trump's team allocated $22.44 million to BitGo via a wallet.

PANews reported on February 3 that, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, the Trump team allocated a wallet (Aduis...PUU4) to transfer 5.267 million Trumps, worth
Share
PANews2026/02/03 09:25
Republican mocked for scheme to campaign to women through his Tinder profile

Republican mocked for scheme to campaign to women through his Tinder profile

Florida gubernatorial candidate James Fishback unveiled an unorthodox campaign strategy on Monday: take his candidacy onto Tinder.Fishback, a 31-year-old hedge
Share
Rawstory2026/02/03 09:34