TLDR Bitcoin fell to $76,511, slipping below the $80,000 level over the weekend. Jim Cramer said BTC’s fall shows its unreliability as a short-term currency. CramerTLDR Bitcoin fell to $76,511, slipping below the $80,000 level over the weekend. Jim Cramer said BTC’s fall shows its unreliability as a short-term currency. Cramer

Jim Cramer Questions Bitcoin Stability After Drop Below $80,000

2026/02/02 17:57
3 min read

TLDR

  • Bitcoin fell to $76,511, slipping below the $80,000 level over the weekend.
  • Jim Cramer said BTC’s fall shows its unreliability as a short-term currency.
  • Cramer noted that major holders did not defend Bitcoin at $80,000.
  • MSTR earnings are due February 5, adding pressure on Bitcoin and its stock.

Bitcoin’s fall below the $80,000 mark over the weekend has renewed debate about its short-term reliability. CNBC host Jim Cramer has raised concerns over the lack of market defense during the decline and questioned the role of major holders in stabilizing Bitcoin’s price.

Bitcoin Drops Below Key Price Level Amid Volatility

Bitcoin’s price fell sharply below the $80,000 mark over the weekend, triggering renewed scrutiny of its stability. As of early Monday, Bitcoin was trading at $76,511, down nearly 2% over the previous 24 hours. The drop followed a wider downturn in the crypto market, with Ethereum and other major altcoins also posting losses.

Jim Cramer, host of CNBC’s Mad Money, reacted to the decline on X, formerly Twitter. He labeled Bitcoin’s weekend crash a reflection of its unreliable behavior as a short-term store of value. “The demonstration of what can happen in a weekend with Bitcoin demonstrates its unreliability,” he wrote.

Cramer Questions Bitcoin Backers and Market Support

Cramer criticized what he described as the absence of strong support at the $80,000 level, calling it a “line in the sand.” He expressed surprise that influential Bitcoin advocates and large holders did not intervene to maintain that threshold. “I am always surprised that those who have the most to lose by a falling Bitcoin don’t defend it over the weekend,” he said.

The veteran investor pointed to a mismatch between Bitcoin’s perceived value and the actions of its supporters. He also warned that failing to reestablish the $80,000 level quickly could invalidate a bullish double-bottom pattern and damage investor confidence.

Strategy Inc. and Saylor May Influence Price Action

Cramer’s remarks also included speculation about possible strategic moves from Strategy Inc. (formerly MicroStrategy). The company, known for its large Bitcoin holdings, is expected to report earnings on February 5. Its executive chairman, Michael Saylor, posted a cryptic “more orange” message on X, hinting at a potential Bitcoin purchase.

Cramer suggested that short sellers may be attempting to push both Strategy’s stock (MSTR) and Bitcoin lower before the earnings report. “The shorts are probably trying to break him before that,” he posted. He further noted that defenders of Bitcoin might attempt to change the narrative with coordinated buying.

Market Sentiment Shifts Before Earnings Week

The price drop and the speculation around Strategy’s earnings have shifted sentiment among retail traders. On platforms like Stocktwits, traders expressed caution and even predicted possible liquidation or forced selling. MSTR stock saw a modest decline of 0.27% in overnight trading, after gaining 4.55% on Friday.

Strategy is expected to report revenue of $118 million and EBITDA of $10 million. Retail sentiment on MSTR shifted from ‘neutral’ to ‘bearish’ over the weekend, with message volume remaining high.

Cramer reiterated that despite the noise around Bitcoin, long-term investors should remain focused on corporate fundamentals. “You have to keep your eye on the prize, profits, and not Bitcoin or silver or whatever distraction suits you,” he posted

The post Jim Cramer Questions Bitcoin Stability After Drop Below $80,000 appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16