Johnny Ng sees opportunity in fragmentation: while superpowers draw battle lines, Hong Kong can be the place where both sides still do businessJohnny Ng sees opportunity in fragmentation: while superpowers draw battle lines, Hong Kong can be the place where both sides still do business

Hong Kong Lawmaker Pitches City as Crypto's Neutral Ground Amid US-China Tech Rivalry

3 min read
Hong Kong Lawmaker Pitches City as Crypto's Neutral Ground Amid US-China Tech Rivalry

As crypto regulation splinters along geopolitical fault lines, Hong Kong legislator Johnny Ng is betting the city's future lies in refusing to pick a side.

In recent remarks, the Web3 advocate, who represents the tech sector in Hong Kong's parliament, outlined a vision that's less about winning the crypto race and more about building the track that everyone runs on.

"Crypto cannot be easily divided by country or economy. It is one world," Ng said in an interview with Coindesk.

It's a pragmatic read of the current landscape. With Washington tightening enforcement, Beijing maintaining its ban, and Singapore, Dubai, and the EU all carving out their own frameworks, the industry faces a patchwork of incompatible rules. Ng's pitch: Hong Kong's common law system, open capital flows, and established financial plumbing make it the natural venue for cross-border crypto activity that doesn't fit neatly into any single jurisdiction.

The Shenzhen Factor

What makes Ng's framing interesting is the Greater Bay Area angle. While most crypto hub narratives focus on attracting talent and capital away from competitors, Ng is explicit about leveraging mainland China's resources without trying to replicate them.

Shenzhen has the engineers — a young workforce, average age under 30, with deep hardware and software capabilities. Hong Kong has the legal structure and market access. Ng sees the combination as complementary rather than competitive.

"We can think something, and then we realize something by their human capital," he said.

It's a notable contrast to the zero-sum framing that dominated crypto geography debates in 2023-2024, when jurisdictions competed to poach exchanges fleeing US enforcement.

What's Coming

On the regulatory pipeline: custody and OTC frameworks are expected this year, alongside potential changes for professional investor trading volumes. Ng also flagged AI as a convergence point, arguing Hong Kong can work with both Western and Chinese datasets — a capability increasingly rare as tech decoupling accelerates.

Separately, Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) chief executive Eddie Yue stated that the HKMA has received stablecoin license applications from 36 institutions in the first round and is currently conducting ongoing evaluations, aiming to make decisions as soon as possible and issue the first batch of licenses in March.

Yue noted that the regulatory authority has requested additional information from some applicants. Submissions in the first round mostly contain basic information required for licensing, and further verification will focus on key elements such as specific use cases, risk management arrangements, and reserve asset composition.

HKMA aims to complete the issuance of the first batch of licenses in March but emphasized that the number of initial licenses will be limited, with progress guided by the principle of prudence and stability, Reuters reported on Monday.

The subtext is clear: in a fragmenting world, neutrality has value. Whether Hong Kong can actually deliver on that promise, given its political complexities, remains the open question.

➢ Stay ahead of the curve. Join Blockhead on Telegram today for all the latest in crypto.
+ Follow Blockhead on Google News
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19