The cross-chain bridge CrossCurve, formerly known as EYWA, confirmed it was actively under attack after a security exploit drained roughly $3 million in user assetsThe cross-chain bridge CrossCurve, formerly known as EYWA, confirmed it was actively under attack after a security exploit drained roughly $3 million in user assets

CrossCurve Bridge Hit by $3M Exploit as Message Spoofing Strikes Again

2026/02/02 10:47
3 min read

The cross-chain bridge CrossCurve, formerly known as EYWA, confirmed it was actively under attack after a security exploit drained roughly $3 million in user assets.

The incident quickly drew comparisons to earlier bridge failures, underscoring how long-standing vulnerabilities in cross-chain messaging continue to resurface across the ecosystem.

The exploit unfolded over January 31 and February 1, triggering immediate concern among users and security researchers as funds were siphoned from the protocol’s core contracts across multiple connected networks.

How the Exploit Worked

According to early technical breakdowns, the attack relied on a message spoofing flaw similar in structure to the 2022 Nomad bridge incident.

At the center of the issue was a missing validation check in CrossCurve’s smart contracts, which left a critical execution path insufficiently protected.

Attackers were able to invoke the expressExecute function using spoofed cross-chain messages. By doing so, they effectively bypassed the protocol’s intended gateway verification logic and triggered unauthorized executions directly within the PortalV2 contract. This flaw allowed token unlocks to occur without legitimate cross-chain authorization, giving attackers direct access to protocol-held assets.

The mechanism did not require sophisticated key compromises or oracle manipulation. Instead, it exploited a logic gap in message verification, a category of vulnerability that has repeatedly plagued cross-chain infrastructure.

Impact Across the Protocol

On-chain data from Arkham Intelligence showed the PortalV2 contract balance falling from approximately $3 million to near zero during the attack window. The rapid depletion suggested a largely unimpeded exploit path once the vulnerability was discovered.

The impact was not confined to a single chain. Because CrossCurve connects multiple networks, the exploit appeared to affect assets spanning several ecosystems, amplifying the overall damage and complicating containment efforts.

CrossCurve is backed by Michael Egorov, founder of Curve Finance, and had previously raised $7 million to develop its consensus-based bridging mechanism. The incident therefore carries broader reputational implications beyond the immediate financial loss.

Which Crypto Exchanges Dominated Spot Trading in 2025?

Security Community Reaction

The exploit prompted renewed frustration among security researchers. Taylor Monahan highlighted that message spoofing vulnerabilities remain a recurring failure mode in cross-chain systems, despite years of high-profile lessons from earlier bridge hacks.

The underlying issue, as experts note, is structural. Cross-chain protocols rely heavily on correct message validation across heterogeneous environments, making even small logic oversights potentially catastrophic. The CrossCurve incident reinforces how unforgiving this design space remains.

Takeaway

The CrossCurve exploit is less about a novel attack vector and more about a familiar one reappearing under a new name. Missing validation checks and spoofed messages continue to represent systemic risks for cross-chain bridges, regardless of funding, backing, or architectural ambition. Until message verification is treated as a zero-tolerance surface, similar incidents are likely to remain a recurring feature of cross-chain infrastructure rather than a solved problem.

The post CrossCurve Bridge Hit by $3M Exploit as Message Spoofing Strikes Again appeared first on ETHNews.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19