Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed he earned $70,000 on prediction market platform Polymarket last year through what he calls “anti-insanity mode,” a Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed he earned $70,000 on prediction market platform Polymarket last year through what he calls “anti-insanity mode,” a

Vitalik Made $70K Betting Against “Crazy Things” on Polymarket – Here’s How

4 min read

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed he earned $70,000 on prediction market platform Polymarket last year through what he calls “anti-insanity mode,” a strategy of betting against irrational market frenzy.

The disclosure came during an extensive interview with Foresight News in Chiang Mai, where Buterin outlined his growing concerns that crypto applications are diverging from their original missions despite significant technological progress.

Buterin’s profit strategy involved identifying markets caught in “crazy mode” and wagering that unlikely events wouldn’t materialize, including bets against Donald Trump winning the Nobel Peace Prize and the dollar collapsing to zero during panic periods.

The comments arrive as prediction market adoption surges, with Polymarket app installs jumping 1,200% between January and December 2025, while weekly trading volume across platforms exploded from $500 million to nearly $6 billion.

Three Urgent Missions Driving Ethereum’s Direction

Buterin framed his current motivation around three escalating concerns that extend beyond technical development into existential threats facing the crypto industry.

My biggest fear right now is that the entire industry will eventually degenerate into a place for 100% cryptocurrency speculation, with only conjecture and no real applications,” he said.

Beyond this “doomsday scenario,” Buterin emphasized the need to improve Ethereum’s technology, particularly by making Layer 2 networks more efficient and decentralized while catching up with Web2 user experiences.

His third priority addresses a darker possibility.

If we fail with Crypto, the future technological world could very well be completely dominated by Centralized AI, which would be a very dangerous future,” Buterin warned.

He positioned cryptocurrency as “our defense against this trend of digital totalitarianism and for maintaining diversity and freedom in the technological world.

When Technology Succeeds, But Applications Fail

The Ethereum founder identified a fundamental disconnect emerging across blockchain development over the past year that threatens the industry’s broader purpose.

Over the past year, Ethereum has made tremendous progress in scaling technology,” Buterin explained, noting gas capacity increases from 30 million to 60 million with goals reaching 300 million this year.

However, a recent network research report from MigaLabs shows that Ethereum has struggled with data-heavy blocks since December’s Fusaka upgrade, with missed-slot rates climbing above 1.7% when blob counts exceed 16.

Despite these challenges and advances, he also expressed deep concern about application-layer stagnation, arguing that prediction markets remain the only sector showing explosive growth in 2025, yet even these platforms expose significant problems.

Buterin criticized Polymarket’s focus on short-term bets, such as hourly Bitcoin price movements and weekly sports outcomes.

These short-term bets don’t have much social significance in the long run,” he said, advocating instead for mechanisms with long-term incentives like Robin Hanson’s Futarchy concept, currently being tested by MetaDAO, where prediction markets determine governance methods rather than just betting outcomes.

When asked about priority applications, Buterin emphasized decentralized social networking first, followed by “smarter” DAOs that move beyond simple token voting.

It can’t just be about issuing a token and having a vote,” he said. “Developers need to think more deeply: What are the specific goals of this organization? What kind of governance structure best matches these goals?

As these infrastructure challenges persist, the Ethereum Foundation recently elevated quantum resistance to a top strategic priority, allocating $2 million in funding and a dedicated Post Quantum team.

Oracle Vulnerabilities Threaten Prediction Market Growth

Buterin highlighted critical security flaws in current oracle systems that could undermine the reliability of prediction markets as adoption accelerates.

He recounted a Ukrainian conflict market in which the Institute for War Studies’ maps served as the data source for determining Russian control of a train station.

ISW employees, perhaps by mistake or intentionally, hacked their own system, and their maps suddenly updated to show that Russian troops controlled the train station,” Buterin explained.

This caused an event with a 5% probability to become certain instantly before ISW retracted the update the next day.

Current Oracle solutions face serious limitations. While centralized models like Bloomberg require trusting a single entity, decentralized token-voting systems like UMA suffer from game-theoretic flaws that allow whales to manipulate voting results.

Even if you vote for the truth, if you oppose the majority, the system will judge you as the loser and you will lose money,” Buterin said, forcing participants to vote with whales rather than truth.

Despite Buterin’s warning, the Prediction Market economy is booming. Polymarket returned to the U.S. market following CFTC approval with ultra-low 10-basis-point taker fees, while the company secured a $2 billion investment from Intercontinental Exchange at a nearly $9 billion valuation.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19