Trove Markets has raised the ire of its community following its sudden flip in its decentralized perpetual exchange, which transitioned from Hyperliquid to SolanaTrove Markets has raised the ire of its community following its sudden flip in its decentralized perpetual exchange, which transitioned from Hyperliquid to Solana

Trove Backers Seek Refunds After Sudden Pivot From Hyperliquid to Solana

4 min read
  • Trove shifted its focus from Hyperliquid to Solana after securing over 11.5 million dollars in Hyperliquid-related funds.
  • Members of the village have been demanding a refund because the initial terms of their investment do not apply.
  • Advisors on-chain pointed out some activity with the HYPE token, which further drew focus before the launch of the TROVE token.

Trove Markets has raised the ire of its community following its sudden flip in its decentralized perpetual exchange, which transitioned from Hyperliquid to Solana, amid having raised over $11.5 million for its launch, which was based on its Hyperliquid model. Backers are now demanding refunds as the project’s TGEP approaches.

The token sale for TROVE was expected to take place between January 8th and January 11th, and the token generation sale was also expected to continue on Monday at 4:00 pm UTC. Nevertheless, Trove has admitted that the move to Solana and the handling of requests for refunds could take some extra time.

Trove first disclosed the pivot in a Friday post on X. Shortly after, one of the project’s builders, known as “Unwise,” explained that a liquidity partner had withdrawn 500,000 Hyperliquid (HYPE) tokens that Trove needed to deploy its product on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure.

“This changes our constraints,” Unwise said. “We’re no longer building on Hyperliquid rails, so we’re rebuilding the perp DEX on Solana from the ground up.”

Hyperliquid exit sparks backlash

The announcement caught many supporters off guard. In November, Trove raised a separate $20 million to purchase 500,000 HYPE tokens required for Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 staking model. That stake acts as a slashable security bond needed to launch a perpetual market on Hyperliquid, which made the project’s original roadmap heavily dependent on that ecosystem.

As a result, critics argue that Trove raised capital under specific technical and ecosystem assumptions that no longer apply. Several backers immediately took to X to demand refunds rather than a revised roadmap.

“Refund everyone ASAP and re-raise with your new conditions,” wrote X user NMTD.HL. “People did not invest in your ICO for you to launch on Solana.”

Another user, HYPEconomist, echoed the sentiment. “You raised money to build on Hyperliquid. Give it back and raise again on Solana if that’s what your community wants.”

Others have asked Trove to elucidate their intentions with refund options following the TGE and how the Solana rebuild impacts existing promises.

Trove pushes ahead with Solana rebuild

Despite all this criticism, Trove is set to work on Solana and assist in building their product of a limitless collectibles exchange based on perpetual exchange. The platform aims to support trading for assets such as Pokémon cards and Counter-Strike 2 skins, a niche that Bitwise projected in September could grow into a $21.4 billion market.

Trove said the Solana pivot allows the team to rebuild without the constraints imposed by Hyperliquid’s staking and liquidity requirements. However, the team has not yet detailed how it plans to replace the capital structure tied to the original HYPE stake.

On-chain activity raises new questions

Adding to the controversy, blockchain investigator ZachXBT and the Hyperliquid News account flagged several Trove-related transfers involving HYPE tokens. The observations relied on data from the Hyperliquid block explorer, Hypurrscan, and have fueled speculation about how the tokens raised for the Hyperliquid launch were distributed after the pivot.

So far, Trove has not publicly addressed the flagged transfers. Cointelegraph reached out for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

With the TGE looming ever closer, Trove faces ever-creasing pressure to repair public trust and make it abundantly clear how the project’s refund structure and Solana roadmap relate to each other. The results may determine how future projects communicate changes in the now-skeptical world of token economics.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Newrez to Recognize Cryptocurrency Holdings in U.S. Mortgage Qualification Framework

Market Opportunity
Talisman Logo
Talisman Price(SEEK)
$0.06228
$0.06228$0.06228
-2.24%
USD
Talisman (SEEK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge

The post The Manchester City Donnarumma Doubters Have Missed Something Huge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MANCHESTER, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 14: Gianluigi Donnarumma of Manchester City celebrates the second City goal during the Premier League match between Manchester City and Manchester United at Etihad Stadium on September 14, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images) Visionhaus/Getty Images For a goalkeeper who’d played an influential role in the club’s first-ever Champions League triumph, it was strange to see Gianluigi Donnarumma so easily discarded. Soccer is a brutal game, but the sudden, drastic demotion of the Italian from Paris Saint-Germain’s lineup for the UEFA Super Cup clash against Tottenham Hotspur before he was sold to Manchester City was shockingly brutal. Coach Luis Enrique isn’t a man who minces his words, so he was blunt when asked about the decision on social media. “I am supported by my club and we are trying to find the best solution,” he told a news conference. “It is a difficult decision. I only have praise for Donnarumma. He is one of the very best goalkeepers out there and an even better man. “But we were looking for a different profile. It’s very difficult to take these types of decisions.” The last line has really stuck, especially since it became clear that Manchester City was Donnarumma’s next destination. Pep Guardiola, under whom the Italian will be playing this season, is known for brutally axing goalkeepers he didn’t feel fit his profile. The most notorious was Joe Hart, who was jettisoned many years ago for very similar reasons to Enrique. So how can it be that the Catalan coach is turning once again to a so-called old-school keeper? Well, the truth, as so often the case, is not quite that simple. As Italian soccer expert James Horncastle pointed out in The Athletic, Enrique’s focus on needing a “different profile” is overblown. Lucas Chevalier,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:38
Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress

Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress

The post Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a tense week for crypto markets, marathon digital has drawn
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/06 15:16
This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

The post This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. United States Representative Cloe Fields has seen his stake in Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ: OPEN) stock return over 200% in just a matter of weeks. According to congressional trade filings, the lawmaker purchased a stake in the online real estate company on July 21, 2025, investing between $1,001 and $15,000. At the time, the stock was trading around $2 and had been largely stagnant for months. Receive Signals on US Congress Members’ Stock Trades Stocks Stay up-to-date on the trading activity of US Congress members. The signal triggers based on updates from the House disclosure reports, notifying you of their latest stock transactions. Enable signal The trade has since paid off, with Opendoor surging to $10, a gain of nearly 220% in under two months. By comparison, the broader S&P 500 index rose less than 5% during the same period. OPEN one-week stock price chart. Source: Finbold Assuming he invested a minimum of $1,001, the purchase would now be worth about $3,200, while a $15,000 stake would have grown to nearly $48,000, generating profits of roughly $2,200 and $33,000, respectively. OPEN’s stock rally Notably, Opendoor’s rally has been fueled by major corporate shifts and market speculation. For instance, in August, the company named former Shopify COO Kaz Nejatian as CEO, while co-founders Keith Rabois and Eric Wu rejoined the board, moves seen as a return to the company’s early innovative spirit.  Outgoing CEO Carrie Wheeler’s resignation and sale of millions in stock reinforced the sense of a new chapter. Beyond leadership changes, Opendoor’s surge has taken on meme-stock characteristics. In this case, retail investors piled in as shares climbed, while short sellers scrambled to cover, pushing prices higher.  However, the stock is still not without challenges, where its iBuying model is untested at scale, margins are thin, and debt tied to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:02