Senate President Pro Tempore Ping Lacson says this may have resulted in a bloated count of ghost flood control projectsSenate President Pro Tempore Ping Lacson says this may have resulted in a bloated count of ghost flood control projects

Ex-DPWH chief Bonoan gave Malacañang wrong flood project coordinates – Lacson

2026/01/14 16:05

MANILA, Philippines – Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo “Ping” Lacson said on Wednesday, January 14, that former public works secretary Manuel Bonoan had given Malacañang the wrong coordinates to alleged ghost flood control projects.

Speaking to reporters, the chair of the Senate blue ribbon panel investigating corruption in flood projects said that the wrong coordinates led to a bloated count of ghost flood control projects.

When asked why Bonoan would “deliberately” try to inflate the tally of ghost flood control projects, Lacson said the former public works chief might have been trying to cover up his tracks.

“That’s part of misleading Malacañang because he submitted the wrong coordinates,” he said in Filipino.

Bonoan has been in the United States since November 2025 after telling authorities he will return by December 17.

Former DPWH undersecretary Roberto Bernardo earlier accused Bonoan, Senator Mark Villar who was public works chief of the Rodrigo Duterte administration, and the late former DPWH undersecretary Cathy Cabral as the operators of the “kickback” system in the agency. The Independent Commission for Infrastructure has since recommended the filing of charges against Bonoan and Cabral.

Must Read

Mark Villar, Bonoan, Cabral operated kickback system in DPWH – witness

Lacson said that when the composite teams of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, Philippine National Police, and Department of Economy, Planning and Development went to the supposed project sites using the wrong coordinates, of course, they did not see any project, and reported them as “ghost projects.”

“So substantially lower dapat ‘yung bilang ng ghost flood control projects (the number of ghost flood control projects should be substantially lower),” he said.

Because of this, Lacson said the Department of Public Works and Highways is trying to correct the list by comparing the coordinates in their Multi-Year Planning and Scheduling system to those in the department’s Project and Contract Management Application.

Blue ribbon probe returns

Apart from Bonoan’s alleged attempt to cover up his tracks, Lacson said the blue ribbon panel will also look into other new developments regarding the flood control scandal when it resumes its hearings on Monday, January 19.

Lacson said the investigation will look into the supposed links between former House speaker Martin Romualdez and the Discaya couple, fueled by rumors that Romualdez allegedly purchased a property in a posh subdivision in Makati City through the Discayas.

“If verified to be true, this could possibly establish a direct connection between the former speaker and the Discayas. In this regard, we may invite the former owner of the property to shed light,” he said.

Lacson also claimed that he spoke to at least three sources who confirmed that the purchase was made through a third party. If true, Lacson believes the transaction hints at a closer relationship between the presidential cousin and the Discayas.

“One of the stories was that a maid saw the Discayas here [at the Senate] during the hearings and said, ‘Ma’am, they’re the people that bought your house,’” Lacson recalled in a mix of English and Filipino.

Lacson also said his panel will look into the “Cabral files,” a set of DPWH documents that allegedly showed the department’s funding for congressional districts from 2023 to 2025. He added that the committee has ordered the DPWH to present the original files through a subpoena duces tecum.

The files were initially released in December by Batangas 1st District Representative Leandro Leviste.

Must Read

Who else got hold of the ‘Cabral files’ prior to her death?


– Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Propy Logo
Propy Price(PRO)
$0.3571
$0.3571$0.3571
-3.35%
USD
Propy (PRO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Haier Shines at Australian Open 2026: Official Partner Elevates the Game with Smart Innovation and Purpose

Haier Shines at Australian Open 2026: Official Partner Elevates the Game with Smart Innovation and Purpose

MELBOURNE, Australia, Jan. 25, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Haier, the world’s No.1 major home appliance brand, continues its strategic partnership with the Australian Open
Share
AI Journal2026/01/26 11:30
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00