BitcoinWorld Upbit WCT Circulation Plan Shift: Strategic 8.2M Token Supply Increase Alters WalletConnect Trajectory In a significant move for tokenomics, SouthBitcoinWorld Upbit WCT Circulation Plan Shift: Strategic 8.2M Token Supply Increase Alters WalletConnect Trajectory In a significant move for tokenomics, South

Upbit WCT Circulation Plan Shift: Strategic 8.2M Token Supply Increase Alters WalletConnect Trajectory

2026/01/12 13:30
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

BitcoinWorld

Upbit WCT Circulation Plan Shift: Strategic 8.2M Token Supply Increase Alters WalletConnect Trajectory

In a significant move for tokenomics, South Korea’s leading cryptocurrency exchange Upbit has announced a pivotal revision to the circulation schedule for WalletConnect (WCT). This strategic adjustment, confirmed on March 15, 2025, directly increases the planned token supply for the first quarter by over 8.2 million WCT. Consequently, this decision carries substantial implications for investors, the project’s roadmap, and the broader decentralized application (dApp) connectivity landscape.

Upbit’s WCT Circulation Plan: A Detailed Breakdown of the Change

Upbit’s official communication outlines a precise modification to the WalletConnect token emission schedule. The exchange executed this change at the explicit request of the WalletConnect project team. A review of the updated data reveals a clear quantitative shift. Initially, the total circulating supply planned for Q1 2025 stood at 351,144,932 WCT. Following the revision, this figure now reaches 359,328,670 WCT. This represents a net increase of 8,183,738 tokens entering circulation earlier than previously scheduled. Furthermore, Upbit provided forward guidance, noting the circulating supply for the second quarter of 2025 is currently projected at 405,955,682 WCT.

This alteration is not merely a numerical update. It reflects a dynamic response to the project’s evolving needs. Token circulation plans are foundational to a cryptocurrency’s economic model. They influence liquidity, market capitalization, and investor perception. A reputable exchange like Upbit altering such a plan underscores a coordinated strategy between the platform and the project developers. The change suggests a reassessment of capital requirements or user adoption timelines.

Understanding WalletConnect’s Role in Web3

To fully grasp the impact, one must understand WalletConnect’s function. It is not a standalone cryptocurrency for payments. Instead, WalletConnect is an open-source protocol. It enables secure connections between decentralized wallets and dApps across different blockchains. Think of it as a critical bridge in the Web3 infrastructure. The WCT token governs this protocol through a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). Holders use WCT to vote on proposals and steer the project’s development. Therefore, changes to its supply and circulation directly affect governance power distribution and protocol security.

Analyzing the Market Impact and Tokenomics Implications

The immediate market reaction to such news is a key consideration. Historically, unexpected increases in token supply can exert downward pressure on price due to simple supply and demand dynamics. However, context is paramount. This was a planned, transparent adjustment requested by the project team and published by a major exchange. Transparency mitigates the negative shock often associated with surprise supply unlocks. The market had previously priced in the original circulation schedule. Now, it must digest the new, accelerated timeline for these 8.2 million tokens.

Analysts often examine the purpose behind supply changes. Potential reasons for WalletConnect’s request could include:

  • Ecosystem Growth Funding: Accelerating development grants or partnership incentives.
  • Enhanced Liquidity Provision: Ensuring sufficient market depth on exchanges for larger users.
  • Community & Governance Expansion: Distributing more tokens to active protocol participants and voters.
  • Strategic Treasury Management: Aligning the project’s financial runway with updated operational goals.

The following table compares the original and revised supply figures for clarity:

Period Original Circulating Supply (WCT) Revised Circulating Supply (WCT) Change
Q1 2025 351,144,932 359,328,670 +8,183,738
Q2 2025 Data Not Specified 405,955,682 N/A

Upbit’s Authoritative Role in the Korean Crypto Ecosystem

Upbit’s announcement carries extra weight due to its market position. Operated by Dunamu Inc., Upbit is South Korea’s largest digital asset exchange by trading volume. It commands immense influence over domestic cryptocurrency trends. The platform’s rigorous digital asset screening process is well-known. Therefore, its continued support and proactive communication regarding WCT signal ongoing confidence in the project’s legitimacy and roadmap. For global observers, Upbit often acts as a bellwether for Asian market sentiment. Its compliance-focused approach means such announcements undergo thorough review, enhancing their credibility.

This event also highlights the evolving relationship between exchanges and projects. Exchanges are no longer mere trading venues. They are active ecosystem participants that facilitate transparent communication. By formally updating the circulation plan, Upbit provides a critical service. It ensures all market participants, from retail traders to institutional analysts, operate with the same fundamental data. This transparency is a cornerstone of mature financial markets and is increasingly demanded in the cryptocurrency sector.

Expert Perspective on Supply Schedule Adjustments

Industry analysts note that controlled, communicated supply changes are a sign of project maturity. “A static tokenomics model often fails to meet a project’s real-world needs,” explains a blockchain economist from the Seoul Fintech Lab. “The ability to strategically adjust vesting or emission schedules in response to ecosystem growth or market conditions demonstrates agile governance. The critical factors are transparency, a clear rationale, and sufficient notice—all of which appear present in this Upbit announcement regarding WCT.” This perspective frames the change not as a red flag, but as a strategic operational decision.

Conclusion: A Strategic Pivot for WalletConnect’s Future

Upbit’s update to the WalletConnect (WCT) circulation plan marks a strategic inflection point. The increase of 8.2 million tokens in the Q1 2025 supply is a data-driven decision with clear origins. It reflects a collaborative adjustment between a leading exchange and a foundational Web3 protocol project. While market participants will monitor price action closely, the underlying narrative is one of proactive governance. This move aims to better align token distribution with WalletConnect’s operational goals for the year. Ultimately, the long-term success of the Upbit WCT circulation plan change will hinge on how effectively the project deploys these tokens to strengthen its protocol, grow its community, and secure its position as essential Web3 infrastructure.

FAQs

Q1: What exactly did Upbit change about the WalletConnect (WCT) token?
Upbit revised the planned circulating supply schedule for WCT. The amount of tokens scheduled to be in circulation by the end of Q1 2025 increased from 351,144,932 WCT to 359,328,670 WCT, a rise of 8,183,738 tokens.

Q2: Why did this WCT circulation plan change happen?
The change was made at the specific request of the WalletConnect project team. While the exact reason is not detailed in the announcement, such adjustments typically relate to funding ecosystem development, enhancing liquidity, or managing the project’s treasury and community incentives.

Q3: Does an increased token supply mean the price of WCT will drop?
Not necessarily. While increased supply can put downward pressure on price, this was a transparent, pre-announced adjustment. The market impact depends on why the tokens are being released and how they are used. If used for growth initiatives that increase demand, the net effect could be neutral or positive.

Q4: What is the circulating supply of WCT projected to be in Q2 2025?
According to the data released by Upbit alongside the Q1 change, the projected circulating supply for the second quarter of 2025 is 405,955,682 WCT.

Q5: How does this change affect WalletConnect as a protocol?
WalletConnect is a connectivity protocol, and WCT is its governance token. Releasing more tokens into circulation can decentralize governance voting power further if distributed to users. It can also provide the project treasury with more resources to fund development, security audits, and partnerships, potentially accelerating protocol improvements.

This post Upbit WCT Circulation Plan Shift: Strategic 8.2M Token Supply Increase Alters WalletConnect Trajectory first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Market Opportunity
WalletConnect Logo
WalletConnect Price(WCT)
$0.06034
$0.06034$0.06034
+5.95%
USD
WalletConnect (WCT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

Uniswap trades at $3.88 with neutral RSI at 51.98. Technical analysis suggests potential breakout to $4.17 upper Bollinger Band, with bullish targets reaching $
Share
BlockChain News2026/03/12 17:21
Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Integrating AI into applications is a balancing act between performance, cost, and intelligence. Traditionally, high-performance AI models come with steep costs
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 16:55
Cash Flow Valuation HyperLiquid: Could $HYPE Reach $385 in Five Years?

Cash Flow Valuation HyperLiquid: Could $HYPE Reach $385 in Five Years?

Author: G3ronimo Compiled by: TechFlow HyperLiquid has grown into a mature crypto-native exchange, with the majority of its net fees programmatically distributed directly to token holders through an "Assistance Fund" (AF). This design makes $HYPE one of the few tokens capable of being valued based on cash flow. To date, most valuations of HyperLiquid have relied on traditional multiples, comparing it to established financial platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood, using EBITDA or revenue multiples as a reference. Unlike traditional corporate stocks, where management typically retains and reinvests earnings at their discretion, HyperLiquid systematically returns 93% of transaction fees directly to token holders through a support fund. This model creates predictable and quantifiable cash flows, making it well-suited for detailed discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis rather than static multiple comparisons. Our methodology begins by determining $HYPE's cost of capital. We then invert the current market price to determine the market-implied future earnings. Finally, we apply growth projections to these earnings streams and compare the resulting intrinsic value to today's market price, revealing the valuation gap between current pricing and fundamental value. Why choose discounted cash flow (DCF) over a multiple? While other valuation methods compare HyperLiquid to Coinbase and Robinhood via EBITDA multiples, these methods have the following limitations: The difference between the corporate and token structures: Coinbase and Robinhood are corporate stocks, whose capital allocation is guided by the board of directors, and profits are retained and reinvested by management; while HyperLiquid systematically returns 93% of trading fees directly to token holders through a relief fund. Direct Cash Flow: HyperLiquid's design generates predictable cash flows that are well-suited to DCF models, rather than static multiples. Growth and risk characteristics: DCFs are able to explicitly model different growth scenarios and risk adjustments, whereas multiples may not adequately capture growth and risk dynamics. Determining an appropriate discount rate To determine our cost of equity, we start with reference data from the public market and adjust for cryptocurrency-specific risks: Cost of equity (r) ≈ Risk-free rate + β × Market risk premium + Crypto/illiquidity premium Beta Analysis Based on regression analysis with the S&P 500: Robinhood (HOOD): Beta of 2.5, implied cost of equity of 15.6%; Coinbase (COIN): Beta of 2.0, implied cost of equity of 13.6%; HyperLiquid (HYPE): Beta is 1.38 and the implied cost of equity is 10.5%. At first glance, $HYPE appears to have a lower beta, and therefore a lower cost of equity than Robinhood and Coinbase. However, the R² value reveals an important limitation: HOOD: The S&P 500 explains 50% of its returns; COIN: The S&P 500 explains 34% of its return; HYPE: The S&P 500 only explains 5% of its returns. $HYPE’s low R² suggests that traditional stock market factors are insufficient to explain its price fluctuations, and crypto-native risk factors need to be considered. risk assessment Despite $HYPE’s lower beta, we still adjust its discount rate from 10.5% to 13% (which is more conservative compared to COIN’s 13.6% and HOOD’s 15.6%) for the following reasons: Lower governance risk: Direct programmatic distribution of 93% of fees reduces concerns about corporate governance. In contrast, COIN and HOOD do not return any earnings to shareholders, and their capital allocation is determined by management. Higher Market Risk: $HYPE is a crypto-native asset and is subject to additional regulatory and technological uncertainties. Liquidity considerations: Token markets are generally less liquid than established stock markets. Get the Market Implied Price (MIP) Using our 13% discount rate, we can reverse engineer the market’s implied earnings expectations at the current $HYPE token price of approximately $54: Current market expectations: 2025: Total revenue of $700 million 2026: Total revenue of $1.4 billion Terminal growth: 3% annual growth thereafter These assumptions yield an intrinsic value of approximately $54, which is consistent with current market prices. This suggests that the market is pricing in modest growth based on current fee levels. At this point we need to ask a question: Does the market-implied price (MIP) reflect future cash flows? Alternative growth scenarios @Keisan_Crypto presents an attractive 2-year and 5-year bull market scenario. Original tweet link: Click here Two-year bull market forecast According to @Keisan_Crypto’s analysis, if HyperLiquid achieves the following goals: Annualized fees: $3.6 billion Aid fund income: $3.35 billion (93% of fees) Result: HYPE's intrinsic value is $128 (140% undervalued at current price) Related links Five-year bull market scenario Under a five-year bull market scenario (link), he predicts that transaction fees will reach $10 billion annually, with $9.3 billion accruing to $HYPE. He assumes HyperLiquid's global market share will grow from its current 5% to 50% by 2030. Even if it doesn't reach 50% market share, these figures are still achievable with a smaller market share as global trading volumes continue to grow. Five-year bull market forecast Annualized fees: $10 billion Aid fund income: $9.3 billion Result: HYPE's intrinsic value is $385 (600% undervalued at current price) Related links While this valuation is lower than Keisan's $1,000 target, the difference stems from our assumption of normalized earnings growth at 3% annually thereafter, while Keisan's model uses a cash flow multiple. We believe using cash flow multiples to project long-term value is problematic, as market multiples are volatile and can vary significantly over time. Furthermore, the multiples themselves incorporate earnings growth assumptions, while using the same cash flow multiple five years from now as one or two years later implies that growth levels from 2030 onward will be consistent with those in 2026/2027. Therefore, the multiples are more appropriate for short-term asset pricing. However, regardless of which model is used, $HYPE remains undervalued; this is a subtle difference. Additional Value Driver: USDH Under the Native Market model, USDH will use 50% of its stablecoin revenue for buybacks similar to a bailout fund. As a result, $HYPE can increase its free cash flow by $100 million (50% of $200 million) annually. Looking ahead five years, if USDH's market capitalization reaches $25 billion (currently still one-third of USDC's, and an even smaller portion of the total stablecoin market five years from now), its annual revenue could reach $1 billion. Following the same 50% distribution model, this would generate an additional $500 million in free cash flow per year for the aid fund. This would value each token at over $400. Excluding Value Drivers: HIP-3 and HyperEVM This DCF analysis intentionally excludes two important potential value drivers that are not amenable to cash flow modeling. Clearly, these would provide additional incremental value and could therefore be evaluated separately using different valuation methodologies and then added to this valuation. Summarize Our DCF analysis indicates that if HyperLiquid can maintain its growth trajectory and market position, the $HYPE token is significantly undervalued. The token's unique feature of programmatic fee distribution makes it particularly suitable for cash flow-based valuation methodologies. Methodological Notes This analysis builds on research by @Keisan_Crypto and @GLC_Research. The DCF model is open source and can be modified at the following link: https://valypto.xyz/project/hyperliquid/oNQraQIg Market data and forecasts are subject to change, and models should be updated promptly based on the latest information.
Share
PANews2025/09/19 08:00