NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP reminds Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (“Inspire” or the “Company”) (NYSE:INSP) investors of the JanuaryNEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP reminds Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (“Inspire” or the “Company”) (NYSE:INSP) investors of the January

INSP INVESTORS: Contact Kirby McInerney LLP About Securities Class Action Lawsuit On Behalf of Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.

2025/12/31 09:16
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP reminds Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (“Inspire” or the “Company”) (NYSE:INSP) investors of the January 5, 2026 deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment in the class action filed on behalf of investors who acquired Inspire securities between August 6, 2024 through August 4, 2025 (“the Class Period”).

Follow the link below for more information:

[CONTACT THE FIRM IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS]

What Is The Lawsuit About?

The lawsuit alleges that Defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) demand for Inspire, an implantable medical device for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea which uses an implanted sensor and neurostimulator designed to improve respiration during sleep, was poor, as providers had significant amounts of surplus inventory and were reluctant to transition to a new treatment; and (ii) contrary to Defendants’ statements assuring investors that Inspire Medical had taken all necessary steps to ensure a successful launch and, later, that the launch was in fact proceeding successfully – Inspire Medical had failed to complete basic tasks that were essential predicates to launch.

On August 4, 2025, the Company revealed that the Inspire V launch was facing an “elongated timeframe” because, among other issues, “many centers [had not] complete[d] the training, contracting and onboarding criteria required prior to the purchase and implant of Inspire V.” That same day, Defendants further admitted that “software updates for claims submissions and processing did not take effect until July 1,” which meant that “implanting centers [were] not … able to bill for those procedures until July 1.” As a result, many treatment centers chose to continue to treat with an earlier version of Inspire. Finally, Defendants revealed that the Inspire V rollout was plagued by poor demand resulting from excess inventory, and the Company reduced its 2025 earnings guidance by more than 80%. On this news, the price of Inspire shares declined by $42.04 per share, or approximately 32.35%, from $129.95 per share on August 4, 2025, to close at $87.91 on August 5, 2025.

[CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION]

What Should I Do?

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Inspire securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at investigations@kmllp.com, or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters at no cost.

[LEARN MORE ABOUT THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS]

Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP’s website.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts

Kirby McInerney LLP

Lauren Molinaro, Esq.

212-699-1171

https://www.kmllp.com
https://securitiesleadplaintiff.com/
investigations@kmllp.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

The post Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Coinbase has filed a letter with the DOJ urging federal preemption of state crypto laws, citing Oregon’s securities suit, New York’s ETH stance, and staking bans. Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal called state actions “government run amok,” warning that patchwork enforcement “slows innovation and harms consumers.” A legal expert told Decrypt that states risk violating interstate commerce rules and due process, and DOJ support for preemption may mark a potential turning point. Coinbase has gone on the offensive against state regulators, petitioning the Department of Justice that a patchwork of lawsuits and licensing schemes is tearing America’s crypto market apart. “When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken,” Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal tweeted on Tuesday. “This isn’t federalism—this is government run amok.” When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken. This isn’t federalism–this is government run amok. We just sent a letter to @TheJusticeDept urging federal action on crypto market structure to remedy this. 1/3 — paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) September 16, 2025 Coinbase’s filing says that states are “expansively interpreting their securities laws in ways that undermine federal law” and violate the dormant Commerce Clause by projecting regulatory preferences beyond state borders. “The current patchwork of state laws isn’t just inefficient – it slows innovation and harms consumers” and demands “federal action on crypto market structure,” Grewal said.  States vs. Coinbase It pointed to Oregon’s securities lawsuit against the exchange, New York’s bid to classify Ethereum as a security, and cease-and-desist orders on staking as proof that rogue states are trying to resurrect the SEC’s discredited “regulation by enforcement” playbook. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield sued Coinbase in April for promoting unregistered securities, and in July asked a federal judge to return the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:52
RCO Finance Review: AI Robo Advisor, Fees, Risks & Is It Worth It?

RCO Finance Review: AI Robo Advisor, Fees, Risks & Is It Worth It?

When you first hear about RCO Finance, it sounds like the future: an AI‑powered robo advisor that automatically manages investments across crypto and traditional
Share
Fintechzoom2026/03/12 15:13
SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto

SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto

The post SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cybersecurity company SlowMist has introduced
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 14:59