The 4% pullback in Bitcoin’s hashrate over the past month could be an encouraging sign, with VanEck pointing out that miner capitulation has typically acted as The 4% pullback in Bitcoin’s hashrate over the past month could be an encouraging sign, with VanEck pointing out that miner capitulation has typically acted as

Bitcoin’s average 180-day returns were better when hashing power declined than when it rose

The 4% pullback in Bitcoin’s hashrate over the past month could be an encouraging sign, with VanEck pointing out that miner capitulation has typically acted as a contrarian bullish indicator.

Matt Sigel, the company’s crypto research lead, and Patrick Bush, a senior investment analyst, said that in the past, when BTC’s hashrate decline persisted, the market typically responded with larger and more frequent rallies.

However, many Bitcoiners still believe a sustained drop in hashrate signals larger issues in the mining industry, a view VanEck believes could trigger a strong sell-off and significantly impact prices.

Bitcoin’s average 180-day returns were better when hashing power declined than when it rose

The investment management firm presented several examples in its report on Monday that illustrate how hashrate declines tend to benefit long-term holders of Bitcoin. It noted that BTC has delivered positive 90-day returns about 65% of the time following a 30-day drop in hashrate since 2014, versus 54% following hashrate increases. 

Moreover, for the same timeframe, when 90-day hashrate growth turned negative, Bitcoin posted positive six-month returns 77% of the time, averaging gains of about 72%. In times of hashrate increases, BTC still posted positive six-month returns around 61% of the time, though gains only averaged about 48%.

Overall, the average six-month returns for Bitcoin have been about 30 basis points higher during periods of falling hashrate than during periods of rising hashrate. The data also suggests that a negative 90-day hashrate growth has been a materially better entry point for six-month returns, adding around  2,400 basis points.

As of now, Bitcoin’s network hashing power (on a 30-day moving average) has declined roughly 4% over the last month, the biggest drop since April 2024. The mining slowdown has been compounded by news from China’s Xinjiang region, where 1.3 GW of capacity has been shut down following inspections by government officials.

Jack Kong, the former head of Canaan, confirmed that China’s mining activities lost approximately 400,000 machines, resulting in a decrease in hashpower of about 100 exahashes per second in just a single day. That comes a month after China was disclosed as the third globally in mining activity, supplying about 14% of the network’s hashrate.

Nonetheless, many countries remain involved in the BTC mining industry, with estimates suggesting up to 13 are actively supporting it, including Russia, France, Bhutan, Iran, El Salvador, the UAE, Oman, Ethiopia, Argentina, Kenya, and, more recently, Japan.

Bitcoin’s price tumbled 9% in the last 30 days

The last 30 days have seen the price of Bitcoin plummet 9%. In the past 30 days, the price of Bitcoin has declined by 9%, while 30-day volatility has climbed above 45%, a level not seen since April 2025. Bitcoin hit its lowest on November 22, trading at around $80,700 — bringing the 30-day RSI to around 32. Discontinuous speculative demand left perpetual future basis rates at 5% annualized, dipping as low as 3.7%, compared to the annual average of 7.4%.

On-chain data for Bitcoin presents another gloomy image: the hash rate fell 1% month-over-month, daily fees decreased by 14%, and the number of active addresses was down 1%. On the upbeat side, over the last 30 days, Bitcoin DATs increased purchases, accumulating 42k BTC (+4% m/m) from mid-November to mid-December, totaling 1.09 million BTC. That’s the largest purchase since mid-July to mid-August 2025, when DATs totaled 128.1k BTC.

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today

Market Opportunity
Power Protocol Logo
Power Protocol Price(POWER)
$0.30616
$0.30616$0.30616
+7.55%
USD
Power Protocol (POWER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nasdaq-listed iPower reaches $30 million convertible note financing agreement to launch DAT strategy.

Nasdaq-listed iPower reaches $30 million convertible note financing agreement to launch DAT strategy.

PANews reported on December 23 that, according to Globenewswire, Nasdaq-listed e-commerce and supply chain platform iPower announced it has reached a $30 million
Share
PANews2025/12/23 22:19
SelectCam AI Launches Flagship AI-Powered Video Telematics Solutions for Global Fleet Safety

SelectCam AI Launches Flagship AI-Powered Video Telematics Solutions for Global Fleet Safety

SHENZHEN, China–(BUSINESS WIRE)–SelectCam AI, a China-based, product-driven technology company, today announced the launch of its flagship AI video telematics solutions
Share
AI Journal2025/12/23 21:48