The post Terraform Administrator Sues Jump Trading for $4B Over TerraUSD appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The court-appointed administrator overseeing the liquidationThe post Terraform Administrator Sues Jump Trading for $4B Over TerraUSD appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The court-appointed administrator overseeing the liquidation

Terraform Administrator Sues Jump Trading for $4B Over TerraUSD

The court-appointed administrator overseeing the liquidation of Terraform Labs’ remaining assets has filed a lawsuit against Jump Trading, accusing the high-frequency trading firm of unjust enrichment and of playing a central role in the collapse of the Terra ecosystem.

The lawsuit seeks $4 billion in damages and was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal. The case was brought by Todd Snyder, who was appointed to administer Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy plan.

Jump Trading, its co-founder William DiSomma, and former Jump Crypto president Kanav Kariya are named as defendants.

Alleged secret agreements and discounted Luna purchases

According to the complaint, Jump entered into a series of undisclosed agreements with Terraform Labs beginning in 2019. These arrangements allegedly allowed Jump to purchase millions of Luna tokens at prices far below prevailing market rates.

In one cited agreement, Jump reportedly received the right to buy Luna at $0.40 per token. At later points, Luna’s market price exceeded $110. The administrator claims these transactions generated billions of dollars in profits for Jump.

The lawsuit also describes what it calls a “gentlemen’s agreement” under which Jump allegedly committed to supporting the TerraUSD (UST) peg to the U.S. dollar. The filing claims the agreement was intentionally kept secret to avoid regulatory scrutiny.

In May 2021, TerraUSD briefly lost its dollar peg before rapidly recovering. The lawsuit asserts that the rebound was not the result of Terraform’s algorithmic mechanism, as publicly claimed, but instead stemmed from large-scale UST purchases made by Jump.

Following the recovery, the complaint alleges that Jump and Terraform falsely represented the event as proof that the algorithm worked as designed.

Vesting changes and market sales

After identifying weaknesses in TerraUSD’s structure, Jump allegedly negotiated the removal of vesting restrictions on its Luna holdings. This change allowed the firm to regularly receive and sell tokens on the open market without traditional lockup periods, according to the filing.

After the initial depeg, the Luna Foundation Guard was established to defend UST using reserves of Bitcoin and other digital assets. The lawsuit claims that during the final collapse in May 2022, the foundation transferred nearly 50,000 BTC to Jump without a written agreement governing their use.

The administrator alleges that these actions were effectively directed by Terraform co-founder Do Kwon and Kanav Kariya.

The lawsuit also claims DiSomma contacted executives at other crypto trading firms to seek emergency funding for Terra. According to the filing, some recipients of that information instead traded against UST and Luna, accelerating the collapse.

In a statement included in the filing, Snyder said Jump “actively exploited the Terraform Labs ecosystem through manipulation, concealment, and self-enrichment,” while thousands of investors suffered losses.

Jump denies allegations as blame-shifting

Jump Trading denied the claims, calling the lawsuit an attempt to deflect responsibility from Terraform and its founder.

“This is a desperate attempt by Terraform Labs to shift blame and financial responsibility for the crimes committed by Do Kwon,” a company spokesperson said, adding that Jump would “vigorously defend” against the allegations.

In December 2024, Jump’s Tai Mo Shan affiliate agreed to pay $123 million to settle a U.S. regulatory investigation related to its dealings with Terraform in 2021.

Separately, Do Kwon pleaded guilty in August 2025 to two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and wire fraud. In December 2025, a U.S. federal court sentenced him to 15 years in prison, citing deliberate deception of investors and losses estimated at roughly $40 billion.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/13243/terraform-labs-administrator-files-4-b-lawsuit-against-jump-trading-over-terra-usd-crash

Market Opportunity
Terraport Logo
Terraport Price(TERRA)
$0,0027
$0,0027$0,0027
+5,88%
USD
Terraport (TERRA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile partners with IGB Berhad for 5G indoor network deployment across 20 Malaysian properties.
Share
bitcoininfonews2025/12/21 20:20
SOL Price Prediction: Targeting $165-175 Recovery Within 6 Weeks as Technical Setup Improves

SOL Price Prediction: Targeting $165-175 Recovery Within 6 Weeks as Technical Setup Improves

The post SOL Price Prediction: Targeting $165-175 Recovery Within 6 Weeks as Technical Setup Improves appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Felix Pinkston Dec
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 19:51