The post US Clarity Act Will Not Move Needle On Bitcoin’s Price: Analysts appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Veteran trader Peter Brandt said the potential passageThe post US Clarity Act Will Not Move Needle On Bitcoin’s Price: Analysts appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Veteran trader Peter Brandt said the potential passage

US Clarity Act Will Not Move Needle On Bitcoin’s Price: Analysts

Veteran trader Peter Brandt said the potential passage of the US Clarity Act is unlikely to have a significant impact on Bitcoin’s price, after indications that it could pass Congress as soon as January.

“Is it a world-shaking macro development? Nope. Needed for sure, but not something that should redefine value,” Brandt told Cointelegraph on Friday. “Having an asset regulated, particularly an asset for which die-hard investors never wanted to be regulated, is not an earth-shattering event,” he added.

His comments came after White House crypto and AI czar David Sacks said on Thursday, ”We are closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation.”

“We look forward to finishing the job in January,” Sacks said.

Clarity Act has already been priced in: Exec

While Brandt does not see the Clarity Act as a catalyst that will drive Bitcoin (BTC) back to its all-time high of $125,100, he emphasized that the legislation would still be a significant step forward for the wider crypto industry. “The Clarity Act would be positive because it would greatly clarify the regulatory structure for crypto assets,” he said.

Source: David Sacks

Echoing a similar sentiment to Brandt, Ledn’s chief investment officer, John Glover, told Cointelegraph that the potential passing of the Clarity Act has already “been priced into the market.”

“I don’t expect this event to have a significant impact on the markets on day 1,” Glover said, adding that any benefits to price action are likely to be more delayed.

“It is another step toward broad-based acceptance of Bitcoin and ETH as investable assets, so over time I still expect the price trajectory to be up and to the right over time,” Glover said.

Brandt opined that Bitcoin is in a bear market, though said the Clarity Act could mean his “downside bias is moderate.”

Brandt says Bitcoin could fall to $60,000 in 2026

“I believe the charts suggest that Bitcoin could trade down to the $60k level, likely in Q3 of 2026,” he said. That would represent a 31% drop from Bitcoin’s price at the time of publication of $88,000, according to CoinMarketCap.

Related: SEC commissioner says crypto is ‘helping to nudge reassessment’ on privacy

The bill has been top of mind not only for the crypto industry but also for pro-crypto lawmakers.

On Dec. 9, Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, a member of the US Senate Banking Committee and one of the most prominent congressional proponents for addressing digital asset market structure, said she wants to take the next step in advancing the bill in the coming days.

The senator said the crypto industry “was getting a little concerned” about the progress of the bill, adding that drafts were “changed so much every few days” during bipartisan discussions. 

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-clarity-act-bitcoin-price-action-peter-brandt-crypto-trader?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.01134
$0.01134$0.01134
-1.30%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

The post Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin recently sold small
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 05:14