The post Coinbase sues Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut over their attempts to regulate prediction markets, undermining CFTC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.The post Coinbase sues Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut over their attempts to regulate prediction markets, undermining CFTC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.

Coinbase sues Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut over their attempts to regulate prediction markets, undermining CFTC

Coinbase Global Inc. has filed lawsuits against the US states of Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut, escalating a legal fight over who has the authority to regulate prediction markets in the United States.

According to the crypto exchange, the three states are attempting to impose their own rules on prediction markets, which it argues fall under exclusive federal oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 

In a post on X on Friday, Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal said they were stepping outside their authority, and the lawsuit was much needed to stop any state from interfering with a federally regulated activity.

“Congress deliberately chose to exclude only a handful of specific underliers, including “onions” and “motion picture box office receipts’ from the definition of “commodity.” This makes clear that all other subjects, including sporting events, fall within the CFTC’s scope,” he wrote.

In a filing submitted on Thursday to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Coinbase attorneys propounded that federal law leaves no room for states to regulate event contracts traded on federally approved platforms.

The company said the Commodity Exchange Act grants the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over swaps and similar derivatives, and event contracts clearly fall within that definition.

“Simply put, Illinois law is squarely preempted as applied to sports event contracts traded on federally regulated exchanges. But absent this Court’s intervention, Coinbase will suffer species of immediate and irreparable harm from Defendants’ attempts to intrude on this federal sphere. Declaratory and injunctive relief is warranted,” the filing read.

Coinbase continued to make their case, adding that the dispute is not limited to Illinois, even though the federal case was filed there. The company is also legally against actions taken by Michigan and Connecticut, which it says are pursuing similar regulatory approaches.

As reported by Cryptopolitan on December 12, the crypto exchange announced plans to launch a prediction market platform this past Wednesday. According to the court filing, the company plans to begin event-contract trading in the US starting January 2026. The events can relate to economics, elections, climate developments, sports, or other matters with commercial relevance.

The company said its customer base is present in Illinois, where it claims it received pushback from state authorities adamant sports-related contracts violate state law. Coinbase also mentioned it is working with Kalshi, a federally regulated derivatives exchange and designated contract market under CFTC oversight.

Illinois state actions and enforcement threats 

Coinbase also listed the enforcement actions taken by Illinois authorities in its legal filing, which included cease-and-desist letters to prediction markets trading platforms. Those letters were sent to Kalshi and Robinhood, another exchange that contracts Kalshi’s event markets through a partnership.

“The State has publicly threatened the gambling licenses of companies in Illinois that ‘participate in or facilitate” activities involving sports prediction markets. And Illinois has issued a letter to the acting Chair of the CFTC contending that “offering sports event contracts” violates state law,” the attorneys noted.

Coinbase believes these actions have made companies that are otherwise complying with federal rules question their lawfully legal rights. It reiterated that the state’s position pits federally regulated businesses against enforcement agencies, even though they follow CFTC requirements.

“Prediction markets are fundamentally different from sportsbooks. Casinos win only if you lose and set odds to maximize their profits. Prediction markets are neutral exchanges, indifferent to price, that match buyers and sellers,” the CLO Grewal remarked on X.

The company continued to say the enforcement based on state law would damage its reputation as a compliant, publicly listed company. 

“Illinois’s enforcement actions, premised on the theory that Coinbase is violating state law notwithstanding Coinbase’s full compliance with federal law, would immediately undermine Coinbase’s hard-earned reputation as a leader in this space and as a public company that values compliance and follows all applicable laws.”

The filing also noted that Illinois’s sovereign immunity would prevent Coinbase from recovering lost revenue. Even if the state’s legal position were ultimately rejected, the company said it would have no way to recoup damages.

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/coinbase-sues-michigan-illinois-connecticut/

Market Opportunity
WorldAssets Logo
WorldAssets Price(INC)
$0.5836
$0.5836$0.5836
-1.16%
USD
WorldAssets (INC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00