The post MSCI Proposal Could Trigger $15B Crypto Sell-Off in Public Companies appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News A proposed rule change by MSCI is quicklyThe post MSCI Proposal Could Trigger $15B Crypto Sell-Off in Public Companies appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News A proposed rule change by MSCI is quickly

MSCI Proposal Could Trigger $15B Crypto Sell-Off in Public Companies

2025/12/18 16:01
4 min read
Crypto Sell-Off

The post MSCI Proposal Could Trigger $15B Crypto Sell-Off in Public Companies appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

A proposed rule change by MSCI is quickly becoming a major talking point across traditional finance and crypto markets. Analysts warn the move could trigger billions of dollars in forced selling, not just in stocks, but potentially spilling into Bitcoin itself. At the center of the debate is how crypto-heavy public companies are treated inside global equity indexes.

What Is MSCI Proposing and Why Does It Matter?

MSCI, one of the world’s most influential index providers, is considering excluding companies that hold more than 50% of their assets in digital assets from its Global Investable Market Indexes. The proposal was first floated in October and is still under consultation, with a final decision expected by January 15, 2026. If approved, changes would likely take effect in February 2026.

This is not a minor technical tweak. MSCI indexes guide trillions of dollars in institutional capital, meaning any reclassification can instantly reshape market flows.

Why Is the 50% Threshold So Controversial?

The core issue is how MSCI defines risk. The proposed rule relies purely on balance-sheet composition, not on how a company actually operates. Critics argue this rigid threshold ignores the reality of digital asset treasury strategies.

For firms like MicroStrategy, which holds over 671,268 BTC, Bitcoin is treated as a long-term treasury asset rather than a speculative trade. Yet under MSCI’s framework, a rise in Bitcoin’s price alone could push such companies past the 50% mark and lead to index removal, even if their business model hasn’t changed.

Forced Selling is possible, if..

Analysts believe the risk is real. Around 39 publicly listed companies with heavy crypto exposure, worth roughly $113 billion combined, are currently included in MSCI-linked indexes. If excluded, index-tracking ETFs and mutual funds would be forced to sell these stocks automatically.

  • Also Read :
  •   U.S CPI News Today: Could Low Inflation Data Trigger Crypto and Stock Market Rally?
  •   ,

Estimates suggest this could drive between $10 billion and $15 billion in outflows. JPMorgan has separately warned that excluding MicroStrategy alone could trigger about $2.8 billion in selling, highlighting how concentrated and sudden the impact could be.

Crypto-Linked Stocks Could Amplify BTC Volatility

Companies heavily invested in Bitcoin could push BTC markets into turbulence if equity selling intensifies. Analysts warn of a self-reinforcing cycle: falling share prices lead to more index exclusions, forced selling, and heightened volatility.

Institutional Crypto Adoption Could Slow

Beyond short-term volatility, industry participants worry the rule could slow institutional crypto adoption and undermine index neutrality, a core principle of passive investing. It may also invite regulatory scrutiny as policymakers continue debating how digital assets should be classified.

Even though the final decision is still months away, uncertainty is already creeping in. Stocks like MicroStrategy, Coinbase, and Bitcoin miners could face heightened volatility as markets price in the risk. The outcome could shape not only crypto-linked equities but also how digital assets fit into corporate balance sheets worldwide.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

Could companies restructure their balance sheets to avoid index exclusion?

Yes. Companies could reduce reported digital-asset exposure by raising cash, issuing debt, or shifting assets into operating subsidiaries, even if their core strategy remains unchanged. Such moves would be driven by index eligibility rather than business fundamentals, potentially distorting capital allocation decisions.

Could the proposal influence how companies account for digital assets?

Potentially. Firms may reconsider how and where digital assets are held or reported, especially if accounting classifications affect index treatment. This could accelerate lobbying for clearer global accounting standards for cryptocurrencies through bodies like the IASB or FASB.

What happens if MSCI delays or modifies the proposal after consultation?

If MSCI adjusts the threshold, adds grace periods, or introduces qualitative criteria, immediate market disruption could be reduced. However, prolonged uncertainty may still keep valuations volatile until final index rules are locked in and implemented.

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01487
$0.01487$0.01487
+0.06%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Circle unveils CCTP V2 for seamless USDC crosschain transfers with Stellar

Circle unveils CCTP V2 for seamless USDC crosschain transfers with Stellar

The post Circle unveils CCTP V2 for seamless USDC crosschain transfers with Stellar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Circle’s CCTP V2 now supports the Stellar blockchain, allowing direct USDC transfers between Stellar and other networks. CCTP V2 eliminates the need for wrapped tokens or traditional bridges, reducing security risks in cross-chain transactions. Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol Version 2 (CCTP V2) now supports Stellar, the decentralized blockchain platform designed for cross-border payments. Today’s integration enables seamless USDC transfers between Stellar and other blockchain networks. CCTP V2 allows users to move USD Coin, the stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the US dollar, across different blockchains without requiring wrapped tokens or traditional bridges that can introduce security risks. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/circle-unveils-cctp-v2-for-usdc-crosschain-transfers-with-stellar/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 01:52
Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31
Scaramucci Says Trump Memecoins Drained Altcoin Market, Yet Sees Bitcoin Reaching $150,000 by Year-End

Scaramucci Says Trump Memecoins Drained Altcoin Market, Yet Sees Bitcoin Reaching $150,000 by Year-End

Anthony Scaramucci, stated that the introduction of Trump coins in January 2025 had a negative impact on the cryptocurrency revolution.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/16 01:57