The post What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign)The post What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign)

What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets?

OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign) is no longer a Met, neither is Edwin Díaz or Pete Alonso. David Stearns has a lot of work to do. (Photo by Justin Berl/Getty Images)

Getty Images

What has happened to the New York Mets? In a matter of weeks, the team that contended over the past few seasons has been stripped down, and the club that takes the diamond next season won’t look very much like the ones that previously played in Queens. And whether or not the new formulation is successful, the fans are none too pleased.

Goodbye Brandon Nimmo

In November, in what is commonly-referred to as a “challenge trade,” the Mets swapped their longest-tenured player, outfielder Brandon Nimmo, to the Texas Rangers in return for second baseman Marcus Semien. The deal saves New York some money in the long run, as they rid themselves of the five years and $101.25 million left on Nimmo’s eight-year deal he signed in 2023. Semien is owed just $72 million over the final three years of the seven-year, $175 million contract he signed with Texas in December 2021. The Mets also threw in an additional $5 million to offset the difference.

David Stearns, New York’s president of baseball operations, went into the off-season looking to improve the team’s defense. And although he has multiple prospects ready to play second base, he felt the move for Semien – at the cost of Nimmo – was the right choice. After the deal he was quoted as saying losing a fan-favorite like Nimmo “was something we had to think about, no question. That certainly makes decisions like this a little bit more challenging than they otherwise would be. But at the end of the day, I still felt like this was the right decision for the organization.”

Goodbye Edwin Díaz

On Tuesday, the back-to-back World Series champion Los Angeles Dodgers signed closer Edwin Díaz to a three-year, $69 million contract, which, on its face, is three million more than the Mets offered their former closer. However, according to Joel Sherman of the New York Post, the deal includes deferrals of $4.5 million per season, taking the deal down to $21.1 million per season for luxury tax purposes. Could the Mets, under the auspices of the richest owner in baseball, have managed to dig up another $3 million (and less than that on a pure cash flow basis) to keep Timmy Trumpets playing in CitiField for the next three seasons? That seems reasonable. Which raises maybe a larger question: Why didn’t Díaz give them a chance to match the offer? What does it say about the organization that he wanted to head west?

Goodbye Pete Alonso

On Wednesday, Pete Alonso, the team’s all-time home run leader with 264, departed to Baltimore on a 5-year, $155 million contract. The Mets, apparently, were not willing to go beyond three years for the slugger, so didn’t even bother to make an offer. Considering that the day before Alonso signed with the Orioles, fellow slugger Kyle Schwarber re-signed with the Phillies for five years and $150 million, and that he is two years older than the “Polar Bear,” and doesn’t play a defensive position, it is either shocking that the Mets let a franchise player go, or surprising that Philadelphia was willing to roll the dice so substantially. The former is a better analysis.

With Alonso out of the lineup and out of the clubhouse, New York loses the heart and soul of the club, the leader of the “LFGM” brigade, who never found a moment when he couldn’t or wouldn’t rip off his jersey and celebrate with his teammates. There was a real chance that he could have retired as a Met, and if he collected another 236 homers, potentially been the third player (after Tom Seaver and Mike Piazza) to enter the Hall of Fame with a Mets logo on his cap.

There Is Still Time

There are still two months before pitchers and catchers report, and Stearns still has a lot of wheeling and dealing to do. But that may not placate the fans. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic wrote this morning: “The irrational Mets fan, the long-suffering type who suffered through the years of the Wilpon ownership, now must wonder if Fred and Jeff are practicing voodoo on Stearns and owner Steve Cohen.”

With all of the losses (and the addition of Semien and new closer Devin Williams), the team still has not addressed its biggest need: starting pitching. The team set an MLB record for pitchers used by one team in 2025, including 17 different starters. Framber Valdez, Ranger Suárez, and Tatsuya Imai are still available in the free agent market. Maybe the goodwill of acquiring Semien will help with the bad taste of losing Alonso, and uber-agent Scott Boras will direct Imai, the Japanese superstar, to Stearns and Cohen and help quiet the critics. Or, better yet, the team could reach deep into its prospects and some toss in some players on the major league roster, and pull off a blockbuster trade to bring two-time Cy Young winner Tarik Skubal to New York. Stranger things have happened.

The team could still sign Kyle Tucker and let him fill the void in left field caused by the loss of Nimmo. And/or they could add Cody Bellinger, and allow him to become the center fielder they have needed for years, or slot him at first base to fill the Alonso-sized hole on the right side of the infield.

This much is true: the addition of Williams as a Yankees cast-off is not going to move the needle if that is their only major move. As Rosenthal wrote: “The rational Mets fan knows it’s Dec. 10. The irrational Mets fan doesn’t want to hear it.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danfreedman/2025/12/11/what-is-happening-with-and-to-the-new-york-mets/

Market Opportunity
OmiseGo Logo
OmiseGo Price(OMG)
$0.07626
$0.07626$0.07626
-2.65%
USD
OmiseGo (OMG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Husky Inu (HINU) Completes Move To $0.00020688

Husky Inu (HINU) Completes Move To $0.00020688

Husky Inu (HINU) has completed its latest price jump, rising from $0.00020628 to $0.00020688. The price jump is part of the project’s pre-launch phase, which began on April 1, 2025.
Share
Cryptodaily2025/09/18 01:10
DBS, Franklin Templeton, and Ripple partner to launch trading and lending solutions powered by tokenized money market funds and more

DBS, Franklin Templeton, and Ripple partner to launch trading and lending solutions powered by tokenized money market funds and more

PANews reported on September 18 that according to Cointelegraph, DBS Bank, Franklin Templeton and Ripple have partnered to launch trading and lending solutions supported by tokenized money market funds and RLUSD stablecoins.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 10:04