Solana (SOL) and SUI have both reached sizable market capitalizations, raising questions about whether they still provide significant upside from current levels. Meanwhile, some analysts have discussed smaller-cap assets such The post Solana (SOL), SUI, and Low-Cap Tokens: A Market Comparison appeared first on CryptoNinjas.Solana (SOL) and SUI have both reached sizable market capitalizations, raising questions about whether they still provide significant upside from current levels. Meanwhile, some analysts have discussed smaller-cap assets such The post Solana (SOL), SUI, and Low-Cap Tokens: A Market Comparison appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Solana (SOL), SUI, and Low-Cap Tokens: A Market Comparison

2025/12/10 00:00

Solana (SOL) and SUI have both reached sizable market capitalizations, raising questions about whether they still provide significant upside from current levels. Meanwhile, some analysts have discussed smaller-cap assets such as Digitap ($TAP), noting that these early-stage tokens may carry higher volatility.

Solana (SOL): Has the Market Reached a Local Peak?

Solana has experienced a notable decline since its recent yearly high. After reaching approximately $24 in January, the asset has shown 17% and 37% pullbacks based on 30-day and 90-day time frames. At the time of writing, SOL is trading near the $130 level.

Some analysts have suggested that recent price action may indicate the completion of a short-term wave structure. For example, the analyst Morecryptoonl proposed that a corrective move toward the $89–$90 region is possible, while also identifying potential support ranges around $128, $123, and $117.

Despite corrective pressure, other analysts note that broader market catalysts such as ETF launches – could influence Solana’s long-term trajectory. Overall, current commentary reflects mixed expectations depending on timeframe and market conditions.

Why SUI Is Not Considered Undervalued by Some Analysts

SUI’s market capitalization sits around $6 billion. After approximately 15% weekly gains, SUI is trading near $1.60 and approaching potential resistance around $2.00.

While SUI continues to attract attention in the Layer-1 ecosystem, several observers note that its size may limit future upside relative to smaller or earlier-stage digital assets. Analyst CryptoIlokano has outlined a technical setup that suggests potential targets up to $8.00, though such projections are speculative and dependent on market momentum.

Digitap ($TAP): Analyst Discussions Around an Early-Stage Project

Digitap ($TAP) is an emerging low-cap project that has gained attention due to its early development stage and relatively small market size. Early funding rounds have reached approximately $2.3 million, and its presale price has increased since launch.

As with most low-cap crypto assets, price movements have been highly volatile. Analysts who follow early-stage tokens have noted that smaller-cap projects can exhibit larger price swings – both upward and downward – compared to established assets like SOL and SUI. Commentary also highlights Digitap’s focus on global payments and privacy-oriented features, including proposals for lower-fee transfers and tools aimed at enhancing user confidentiality. These capabilities are based on project claims and remain subject to future development and regulatory considerations.

Because presale-stage assets involve material risks, market participants generally view such projects as speculative and suited only to users with high risk tolerance.

How Analysts Compare SOL, SUI, and $TAP

Across multiple independent discussions, a common theme emerges:

  • SOL and SUI:
    • Large market caps
    • Strong existing ecosystems
    • Moderate future upside relative to past performance
    • Price action influenced by macro and sector catalysts
  • Early-stage tokens like $TAP:
    • Smaller market size
    • Higher volatility and higher risk
    • Potential for more pronounced price swings
    • Development milestones yet to be proven

These comparisons do not indicate which asset is “best,” but rather illustrate how analysts segment different types of crypto assets based on risk, maturity, and expected volatility.

Project Links for Further Review

Readers who want to review Digitap’s publicly available materials can visit the project’s official channels:

  • Presale: https://presale.digitap.app
  • Website: https://digitap.app
  • Social: https://linktr.ee/digitap.app
  • Giveaway Information: https://gleam.io/bfpzx/digitap-250000-giveaway

(Links provided for reference only. Users should conduct independent research before participating in any crypto-related activity.)

Disclaimer

Please be advised that all information, including our ratings, advices and reviews, is for educational purposes only. Crypto investing carries high risks, and CryptoNinjas is not responsible for any losses incurred. Always do your own research and determine your risk tolerance level; it will help you make informed trading decisions.

The post Solana (SOL), SUI, and Low-Cap Tokens: A Market Comparison appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

The post House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked a Democrat effort Wednesday to subpoena a group of major banks as part of a renewed investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties. Congressman Jim Jordan, R-OH, is the chairman of the committee. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images Key Facts A near party-line vote squashed the effort to vote on a subpoena, with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is leading a separate effort to force the Justice Department to release more Epstein case materials, voting alongside Democrats. The vote, if successful, would have resulted in the issuing of subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince. The subpoenas would have specifically looked into multiple reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. The failed effort from Democrats followed an FBI oversight hearing in which agency director Kash Patel misleadingly claimed the FBI cannot release many of the files it has on Epstein. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Crucial Quote Dimon, who attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, told reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.” Chief Critic “Republicans had the chance to subpoena the CEOs of JPMorgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of New York Mellon to expose Epstein’s money trail,” the House Judiciary Democrats said in a tweet. “Instead, they tried to bury…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:02
Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over

Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over

The post Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Banking giant Standard Chartered believes that Bitcoin’s four-year cycles are already over.  Historically, Bitcoin price movements have been strongly tied to “halving” events (when the block reward for mining Bitcoin is cut in half, roughly every 4 years). Typically, prices would peak about 18 months after a halving. However, Standard Chartered argues that this old logic no longer reliably predicts price cycles following the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S.  The rationale is that ETFs make Bitcoin more accessible to mainstream investors. For this new dynamic to be proven, BTC would need to break its current all-time high of $126,000. They expect this breakout could happen in the first half of 2026.  Standard Chartered has also lowered its BTC price predictions for the following years (from $200,000 to $100,000 in 2025, from $300,000 to $200,000 in 2026, from $400,000 to $225,000 in 2027, and from $500,000 to $300,000).  You Might Also Like Bitcoin is currently changing hands at $90,397, according to CoinGecko data.  On the same page  Apart from Standard Chartered, there are quite a few analysts and market watchers who argue that the traditional Bitcoin halving cycle is no longer relevant.  In a recent research note, Bernstein analysts assert that the traditional four‑year halving cycle is effectively over due to Bitcoin ETFs dominating the scene. CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju also claims that the flagship cryptocurrency no longer follows four-year cycles, citing institutional buying power.  That said, it remains to be seen whether BTC will be able to reclaim its current all-time high next year.  Source: https://u.today/standard-chartered-bitcoin-halving-cycles-are-over
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 02:46