MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]

Meat importers seek expansion of pork MAV to allow new entrants

2025/12/07 20:01
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade.

In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric tons (MT) limits opportunities for new entrants and fails to reflect current market needs.

According to MITA, pre-MAV, pork production in 1994 was roughly 1 million MT (MMT) and peaked at 1.9 MMT in 2019. Following the African Swine Fever (ASF) outbreak, production reverted to 1994 levels despite an almost doubling of the Philippine population.

MITA said the hog industry’s recovery will take years and that the proposed reallocation, particularly the portion earmarked for state-owned enterprises, which already import duty-free, will not increase total supply.

The MAV is a commitment to the World Trade Organization to allow certain quantities of goods for import. Shipments within the MAV quota are charged a most favored nation tariff, while volumes beyond that pay higher rates.

Pork shipments within the MAV quota are subject to a 15% tariff, while volumes exceeding the MAV are charged the regular 25% rate.

Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel, Jr. has said that the department will review MAV rules after finding that only a handful of importers cornered a significant portion of the quota. MITA said the DA’s proposed rules would allocate 50% of import quotas to processors, 30% to state-owned enterprises, and 20% to other sectors. 

MITA noted that the problem lies not with the existing allocation scheme but with the overall MAV available for importers.

“Those without quota often argue that the system is unfair to them… The challenge arises when new entrants seek to participate but available volumes are insufficient,” MITA President Emeritus Jesus C. Cham said in the letter.

The DA said it intends to maintain the total MAV under the new scheme as increased volumes would hurt the already-low farmgate prices of hog.

“Right now, we can’t raise the MAV because of the low farmgate price. It’s not the right time,” Mr. Tiu Laurel has told reporters.

In November, the DA froze applications for MAV quotas while the new policy was being worked out. MITA said the DA told it that the allocations will be finalized in January.

“The abruptness of this announcement caught licensees entirely by surprise. Orders have already been placed and buying decisions finalized. These sudden shifts have created substantial uncertainty, as imports may now fall under out-quota rates, significantly affecting landed cost and contractual commitments,” Mr. Cham said.

Earlier this year, MITA said it recommended increasing the pork MAV by 500,000 MT to offset the 900,000-MT production lost due to the ASF outbreak. The MAV Advisory Council later proposed an initial MAV Plus of 250,000 MT until 2028. Neither recommendation has been implemented.

MITA urged the government to retain the current MAV Guidelines and activate the MAV Plus mechanism for both pork and poultry, prioritizing existing licensees while designating part of the volume for first-come-first-served allocation.

The group also recommended referring the matter to the MAV Advisory Council, which they said has historically represented all stakeholders. — Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

The post Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Coinbase has filed a letter with the DOJ urging federal preemption of state crypto laws, citing Oregon’s securities suit, New York’s ETH stance, and staking bans. Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal called state actions “government run amok,” warning that patchwork enforcement “slows innovation and harms consumers.” A legal expert told Decrypt that states risk violating interstate commerce rules and due process, and DOJ support for preemption may mark a potential turning point. Coinbase has gone on the offensive against state regulators, petitioning the Department of Justice that a patchwork of lawsuits and licensing schemes is tearing America’s crypto market apart. “When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken,” Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal tweeted on Tuesday. “This isn’t federalism—this is government run amok.” When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken. This isn’t federalism–this is government run amok. We just sent a letter to @TheJusticeDept urging federal action on crypto market structure to remedy this. 1/3 — paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) September 16, 2025 Coinbase’s filing says that states are “expansively interpreting their securities laws in ways that undermine federal law” and violate the dormant Commerce Clause by projecting regulatory preferences beyond state borders. “The current patchwork of state laws isn’t just inefficient – it slows innovation and harms consumers” and demands “federal action on crypto market structure,” Grewal said.  States vs. Coinbase It pointed to Oregon’s securities lawsuit against the exchange, New York’s bid to classify Ethereum as a security, and cease-and-desist orders on staking as proof that rogue states are trying to resurrect the SEC’s discredited “regulation by enforcement” playbook. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield sued Coinbase in April for promoting unregistered securities, and in July asked a federal judge to return the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:52
RCO Finance Review: AI Robo Advisor, Fees, Risks & Is It Worth It?

RCO Finance Review: AI Robo Advisor, Fees, Risks & Is It Worth It?

When you first hear about RCO Finance, it sounds like the future: an AI‑powered robo advisor that automatically manages investments across crypto and traditional
Share
Fintechzoom2026/03/12 15:13
SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto

SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto

The post SlowMist Introduces Security Framework for Autonomous AI Agents in Crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cybersecurity company SlowMist has introduced
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 14:59