King Charles III, on Tuesday, appended the Royal Assent to the Property Act (Digital Assets etc.) 2025, giving…King Charles III, on Tuesday, appended the Royal Assent to the Property Act (Digital Assets etc.) 2025, giving…

King Charles assents to the Property Act, officially recognising crypto as property in the UK

2025/12/03 23:06
3 min read

King Charles III, on Tuesday, appended the Royal Assent to the Property Act (Digital Assets etc.) 2025, giving legal recognition to crypto and other digital assets as personal property under UK law. The move transforms how courts, businesses and individuals treat digital holdings and could reshape the country’s stance in the global crypto economy.

The Act codifies a recommendation by the Law Commission of England and Wales that digital-only assets deserve their own property classification. Until now, digital tokens like bitcoin or NFTs existed in a legal grey area. They were neither “things in possession”, physical items such as gold or cars, nor “things in action”, such as a debt or contractual right.

By creating a third category of personal property, the law ends decades of uncertainty. Under the Act, digital or electronic assets can attract property rights even if they don’t fit traditional property definitions. That means crypto wallets, tokens and other digital holdings are now granted the same legal protections as tangible property.

King Charles III assents to the Property Act, officially recognising crypto as property in the UK

This statutory clarity carries immediate practical implications. Owners of cryptocurrencies and NFTs will gain stronger rights in cases of theft, fraud, or insolvency. Courts will have a clearer mandate to freeze or seize crypto holdings, include them in estate distribution, or address disputes in divorce or liquidation proceedings.

Property Act: a strategic move for the crypto economy

Legal experts and crypto enthusiasts hail the legislation, describing it as a “coming of age” moment for digital assets in the UK. For industry participants and institutional investors, the law offers a firmer foundation to build products, manage risk and scale operations.

Regulators and lawmakers appear to view the reform as part of a broader plan. Alongside emerging rules on stablecoins and custody, the Act aims to cement the UK’s ambition to become a global hub for blockchain and crypto innovation.

Until now, jurisdictions around the world have wrestled with inconsistent treatments of digital assets, often relying on disparate court rulings. The new law promises consistent, predictable treatment under a unified legal framework.

King Charles III assents to the Property Act, officially recognising crypto as property in the UKKing Charles III assents to the Property Act, officially recognising crypto as property in the UK

However, the legislation avoids overly rigid definitions. It does not specify which tokens or digital instruments automatically qualify, leaving that to courts and future case law. That flexibility is intentional: it allows the legal system to adapt as technology advances, without requiring repeated legislation for each new development.

Legal experts warn some questions remain. For example, how the law will apply to complex decentralised protocols, smart contracts, or tokenised real-world assets is yet to be tested. Nonetheless, most agree that the UK has taken a critical first step toward aligning property law with the realities of modern digital markets.

Also read: Bank of England unveils regulatory framework for Pounds-based Stablecoin

In passing the law, Britain has given crypto and other digital assets a home in the common law. For holders of digital wallets, it means their assets are no longer intangible code. They are real, legal property. For the global crypto community, it’s a signal that the UK is serious about embracing the digital economy.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Will Bitcoin Soar or Stumble Next?

Will Bitcoin Soar or Stumble Next?

The post Will Bitcoin Soar or Stumble Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. With the Federal Reserve’s forthcoming decision on interest rates causing speculation, Bitcoin‘s value remains stable at $115,400. China’s surprising maneuvers in the financial landscape have shifted expected market trends, prompting deeper examination by investors into analysts’ past evaluations regarding rate reductions. Continue Reading:Will Bitcoin Soar or Stumble Next? Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/will-bitcoin-soar-or-stumble-next
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:09
House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

The post House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked a Democrat effort Wednesday to subpoena a group of major banks as part of a renewed investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties. Congressman Jim Jordan, R-OH, is the chairman of the committee. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images Key Facts A near party-line vote squashed the effort to vote on a subpoena, with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is leading a separate effort to force the Justice Department to release more Epstein case materials, voting alongside Democrats. The vote, if successful, would have resulted in the issuing of subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince. The subpoenas would have specifically looked into multiple reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. The failed effort from Democrats followed an FBI oversight hearing in which agency director Kash Patel misleadingly claimed the FBI cannot release many of the files it has on Epstein. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Crucial Quote Dimon, who attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, told reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.” Chief Critic “Republicans had the chance to subpoena the CEOs of JPMorgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of New York Mellon to expose Epstein’s money trail,” the House Judiciary Democrats said in a tweet. “Instead, they tried to bury…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:02
Moonshot MAGAX vs Shiba Inu: The AI-Powered Meme-to-Earn Revolution Challenging a Meme Coin Giant

Moonshot MAGAX vs Shiba Inu: The AI-Powered Meme-to-Earn Revolution Challenging a Meme Coin Giant

Discover how Moonshot MAGAX’s AI-powered meme-to-earn platform outpaces Shiba Inu with innovative tokenomics and growth potential in 2025.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 03:15