The post Survey of AI Founders Predicts Perplexity is the AI Giant Most Likely to Fail appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief 300+ AI insiders at Cerebral Valley Summit voted the search startup is the AI company that is most likely to fail Anthropic leads in investor preference with skepticism over OpenAI also noticeable among investors. AGI predictions pushed to 2030 signal cooling enthusiasm More than 300 AI founders and investors at San Francisco’s Cerebral Valley Summit voted Perplexity as the billion-dollar startup most likely to fail, with OpenAI coming in second place. An anonymous survey conducted by independent journalist Alex Heath at a major industry gathering last week pointed to a marked shift in Silicon Valley sentiment. When asked which private tech companies they’d invest in, attendees picked Anthropic over OpenAI, despite the consensus that OpenAI would lead next year’s LMArena leaderboard—a ranking of the world’s most powerful AI models. Perplexity’s Jesse Dwyer dismissed the survey results, calling the event a “judgmental valley conference.” The company’s valuation reportedly jumped from $14 billion to nearly $50 billion in a short span, amid a frenzy that was ringing alarm bells among analysts, prompting comparisons to the dot-com era. Legal troubles and reports of sketchy behavior have compounded the skepticism. Amazon sued Perplexity in November to stop its Comet browser from making purchases on behalf of users. Reddit filed its own lawsuit in October, alleging the company scraped billions of posts. Japanese newspapers Yomiuri Shimbun, Asahi Shimbun, and Nikkei all filed copyright infringement cases. The BBC has also threatened legal action over unauthorized scraping of its content. Cloudflare’s CEO even compared Perplexity’s behavior to that of North Korean hackers. Multiple outlets reported the company ignores robots.txt protocols designed to prevent unauthorized web scraping. Some supposedly “reputable” AI companies act more like North Korean hackers. Time to name, shame, and hard block them. https://t.co/vqMzGRHZPf — Matthew Prince 🌥 (@eastdakota) August 4, 2025 Anthropic… The post Survey of AI Founders Predicts Perplexity is the AI Giant Most Likely to Fail appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief 300+ AI insiders at Cerebral Valley Summit voted the search startup is the AI company that is most likely to fail Anthropic leads in investor preference with skepticism over OpenAI also noticeable among investors. AGI predictions pushed to 2030 signal cooling enthusiasm More than 300 AI founders and investors at San Francisco’s Cerebral Valley Summit voted Perplexity as the billion-dollar startup most likely to fail, with OpenAI coming in second place. An anonymous survey conducted by independent journalist Alex Heath at a major industry gathering last week pointed to a marked shift in Silicon Valley sentiment. When asked which private tech companies they’d invest in, attendees picked Anthropic over OpenAI, despite the consensus that OpenAI would lead next year’s LMArena leaderboard—a ranking of the world’s most powerful AI models. Perplexity’s Jesse Dwyer dismissed the survey results, calling the event a “judgmental valley conference.” The company’s valuation reportedly jumped from $14 billion to nearly $50 billion in a short span, amid a frenzy that was ringing alarm bells among analysts, prompting comparisons to the dot-com era. Legal troubles and reports of sketchy behavior have compounded the skepticism. Amazon sued Perplexity in November to stop its Comet browser from making purchases on behalf of users. Reddit filed its own lawsuit in October, alleging the company scraped billions of posts. Japanese newspapers Yomiuri Shimbun, Asahi Shimbun, and Nikkei all filed copyright infringement cases. The BBC has also threatened legal action over unauthorized scraping of its content. Cloudflare’s CEO even compared Perplexity’s behavior to that of North Korean hackers. Multiple outlets reported the company ignores robots.txt protocols designed to prevent unauthorized web scraping. Some supposedly “reputable” AI companies act more like North Korean hackers. Time to name, shame, and hard block them. https://t.co/vqMzGRHZPf — Matthew Prince 🌥 (@eastdakota) August 4, 2025 Anthropic…

Survey of AI Founders Predicts Perplexity is the AI Giant Most Likely to Fail

2025/11/19 04:20

In brief

  • 300+ AI insiders at Cerebral Valley Summit voted the search startup is the AI company that is most likely to fail
  • Anthropic leads in investor preference with skepticism over OpenAI also noticeable among investors.
  • AGI predictions pushed to 2030 signal cooling enthusiasm

More than 300 AI founders and investors at San Francisco’s Cerebral Valley Summit voted Perplexity as the billion-dollar startup most likely to fail, with OpenAI coming in second place.

An anonymous survey conducted by independent journalist Alex Heath at a major industry gathering last week pointed to a marked shift in Silicon Valley sentiment.

When asked which private tech companies they’d invest in, attendees picked Anthropic over OpenAI, despite the consensus that OpenAI would lead next year’s LMArena leaderboard—a ranking of the world’s most powerful AI models.

Perplexity’s Jesse Dwyer dismissed the survey results, calling the event a “judgmental valley conference.”

The company’s valuation reportedly jumped from $14 billion to nearly $50 billion in a short span, amid a frenzy that was ringing alarm bells among analysts, prompting comparisons to the dot-com era.

Legal troubles and reports of sketchy behavior have compounded the skepticism.

Amazon sued Perplexity in November to stop its Comet browser from making purchases on behalf of users. Reddit filed its own lawsuit in October, alleging the company scraped billions of posts. Japanese newspapers Yomiuri Shimbun, Asahi Shimbun, and Nikkei all filed copyright infringement cases. The BBC has also threatened legal action over unauthorized scraping of its content.

Cloudflare’s CEO even compared Perplexity’s behavior to that of North Korean hackers. Multiple outlets reported the company ignores robots.txt protocols designed to prevent unauthorized web scraping.

Anthropic beats OpenAI? Really?

Perhaps more interesting is how the burgeoning Anthropic preference signals a shift in how investors view the AI race.

Anthropic grew revenue from $87 million at the start of 2024 to over $5 billion by August 2025. The company closed a $13 billion Series F in September at a valuation of $183 billion.

Simply put: enterprise adoption is what’s driving Anthropic’s momentum.

The company has already captured 32% of the enterprise AI market, surpassing OpenAI’s 25% share, according to data compiled by Menlo Ventures.

Claude Code, its developer tool, launched in May, and according to the company’s data, it generates more than $500 million in annualized revenue. Business customers grew from under 1,000 two years ago to over 300,000 today.

Image: Menlo Ventures

OpenAI’s second-place finish in the “most likely to fail” category may seem surprising, given the company’s dominant market position.

But financial concerns may explain the pessimism. OpenAI expects $13 billion in revenue this year alongside an astounding $9 billion in losses. Projected operating losses could hit $74 billion by 2028.

Overall, it seems like Altman’s company is facing a conversion problem: 95% of ChatGPT’s 800 million users don’t pay for the service. OpenAI is committed to spending over $1 trillion over the next decade, primarily on computing infrastructure.

Meanwhile, Anthropic expects to break even in 2028, and OpenAI won’t reach that milestone until the end of the decade, according to financial documents.

Other startups named in the failure poll included Cursor, Figure, Harvey, Mercor, Mistral, and Thinking Machines.

There’s still hope for AI permabulls, however: Nvidia was predicted to reach a $6 trillion market cap by the end of 2026.

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.

Source: https://decrypt.co/348999/survey-ai-founders-perplexity-ai-giant-most-likely-to-fail

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03776
$0.03776$0.03776
+1.01%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

De markt voor crypto-exchange-traded funds (ETF’s) heeft opnieuw een belangrijke mijlpaal bereikt. XRP ETF’s hebben gezamenlijk meer dan 1 miljard dollar aan netto
Share
Coinstats2025/12/16 21:01
XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025

XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025

The post XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. StraitsX Stablecoins Unleash Power: XSGD And XUSD Launch
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:59