Today’s internet wasn’t built for AI. It was built to send emails, browse memes, and binge cat videos in 4K. When autonomous vehicles need to talk to each other across continents, or when distributed AI agents want to collaborate without a central server bottleneck, our legacy internet coughs and wheezes. Enter peer-to-peer satellite networks.Imagine thousands of satellites orbiting Earth, not owned by a single corporation but by decentralized communities.Today’s internet wasn’t built for AI. It was built to send emails, browse memes, and binge cat videos in 4K. When autonomous vehicles need to talk to each other across continents, or when distributed AI agents want to collaborate without a central server bottleneck, our legacy internet coughs and wheezes. Enter peer-to-peer satellite networks.Imagine thousands of satellites orbiting Earth, not owned by a single corporation but by decentralized communities.

P2P Satellite Networks Invoking Edge-AI and Decentralized Intelligence-: Internet-AI Optimization

2025/09/19 12:58

AI is hungry.

Not just for data, but for real-time data - processed fast, everywhere, all the time. From self-driving cars to drone swarms to predictive healthcare; artificial intelligence has evolved over the years, and which each passing evolution, there is an increasing dependance on regularly updated (and re-opted) real-time data… AI is currently changing shift to an internet designed for machines, not just humans anymore.

Here’s the thing, today’s internet wasn’t built for AI. It was built to send emails, browse memes, and (eventually) binge cat videos in 4K. So when autonomous vehicles need to talk to each other across continents, or when distributed AI agents want to collaborate without a central server bottleneck, our baby bloomer internet coughs and wheezes.

\ Now, imagine thousands of satellites orbiting Earth, not owned by a single corporation but by decentralized communities. These satellites don’t just beam internet; they act as the AI cloud in space - routing data, training models, and enabling machines to coordinate without depending on Big Tech data centers.

This is where peer-to-peer satellite networks comes in.

\ \

Why AI Needs a New Internet…

What’s the point really? Why can’t AI just use the internet we already have?

Well, I mean, if the internet was that good, the satellite-network companies won’t still be operating now would they.

\

  1. Latency Kills: It’s the classic Garbage-In-Garbage-Out (GIGO). Self-driving cars or real-time drones can’t afford millisecond delays caused by distant servers. Unlike humans who can wait, machines can’t.
  2. Centralization Bottlenecks: Today’s AI pipelines flow through mega-clouds (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure). If those clouds should supposedly go down, machines can’t go up (literally).
  3. Bandwidth Pressure: AI workloads involve massive streams of sensor data, models, and updates. Our existing fiber + terrestrial networks would choke under that weight.
  4. Trust Issues: Do you really want your AI surgeon’s decision-making routed through a handful of corporations that monetize your data? I know I don’t.

AI demands an internet that’s:

  • Ubiquitous (global coverage, no dead zones)
  • Decentralized (no single choke point)
  • Low-Latency (near-instant responses)
  • Resilient (immune to censorship, shutdowns, or single-point failures)

And that’s where satellites swoop in.

\ \

P2P Satellites: Lights, Camera, ACTION!

Starlink, Kuiper, OneWeb — these are today’s poster children for satellite internet. But they’re still centralized ISPs in the sky - owned, controlled, and managed by mega-corporations. Great for watching Netflix in the Sahara, terrible for building a censorship-resistant AI network.

Now picture this instead: peer-to-peer (P2P) satellite networks.

  • Each satellite is a node in a decentralized mesh.
  • Nodes communicate with each other directly via laser links.
  • Data routes dynamically, not through a central hub.
  • Ownership? Distributed. Think DAO-funded launches, tokenized bandwidth, and community-controlled governance.

In short, the same logic behind blockchains and Web3, but scaled into orbit. It’s BitTorrent, but with satellites and AI workloads.

We’ve seen similar decentralized revolutions before:

  • There was Bitcoin for money… Ethereum for contractsFilecoin for storage… Helium for IoT; and a few others.

Now add: P2P Satellites for AI. 🛰️

This approach extends decentralization literally above our heads. You don’t just fork code; you fork infrastructure (from launchpads to orbit). This ultimately flips the script on today’s AI monopolies. Now, instead of OpenAI, Google, or Meta running planetary-scale models in locked-up server farms, intelligence could be community-distributed, censorship-resistant, and sovereign.

\ \

Edge AI + Satellites = Intelligence Everywhere

Okay, so we’ve got satellites forming a decentralized backbone. But how does this help AI?

Welcome to Edge AI.

Instead of shipping all data back to a distant cloud for processing, AI models run closer to where the data is generated: on devices, local servers, or - as you must’ve guessed - satellites.

The whole idea of Edge AI is… (from ChatGPT)

\ So basically, instead of relying on cloud computing, the AI model is deployed on the “edge” of the network - close to where the data is created. The device then processes information locally, makes decisions in real time, and only sends essential data to the cloud if needed (basically).

Example Scenarios:

  • Autonomous Vehicles: Cars in Lagos, London, and Libya sharing driving conditions via satellites in milliseconds.
  • Drones + Disaster Relief: In an earthquake zone, drones collaborate in real-time, mapping rubble and finding survivors, all while communicating through orbital P2P relays.
  • Agricultural IoT: Smart sensors in farms connect to satellites, running local AI to predict crop disease before it spreads.
  • Decentralized AI Agents: Imagine GPT-style AIs distributed globally, collaborating on tasks through a censorship-proof satellite internet.

\ \

Building Blocks of a P2P AI Internet in Space

What does this infrastructure actually look like?

➡️ Constellation of SmallSats

Forget the era of giant, single-owner satellites. The backbone here is a swarm of affordable, modular SmallSats—miniature spacecraft that multiple stakeholders (startups, research labs, even community co-ops) can launch and maintain. Their modularity means you can swap out sensors or processing units without scrapping an entire satellite.

\

Instead of bouncing signals back to Earth for routing, laser inter-satellite links let these satellites talk directly to each other at blistering speeds. It’s like upgrading from 90s dial-up to fiber optics—but in the vacuum of space.

\

➡️ Onboard Compute

Rather than treating satellites as dumb data couriers, this network packs AI inference chips directly into orbit. That means tasks like image recognition, anomaly detection, or routing optimization happen right where the data is collected—no round-trip to Earth required.

\

➡️ Tokenized Economy

Bandwidth, storage, and compute aren’t free—and this is where a crypto-powered microtransaction layer comes in. Users or organizations pay tiny fractions of a token to borrow resources on demand. Maybe an Earth-observing startup rents extra compute from idle satellites over the Pacific, or a lunar mission buys bandwidth for a critical data dump. The P2P economy keeps the network decentralized and incentivizes participants to maintain and upgrade their nodes.

\

➡️ Governance via DAOs

Who decides which regions get better coverage, or whether to upgrade the network with quantum repeaters? Enter Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). Stakeholders—ranging from hobbyist satellite operators to governments—can vote on proposals, allocate treasury funds, and enforce policies through smart contracts. This prevents gatekeeping by a single actor and ensures the AI internet in space evolves according to community-driven priorities.

\

➡️ Quantum-Safe Encryption

Tomorrow’s quantum computers could render today’s encryption obsolete. To prevent that nightmare scenario, the network bakes in quantum-safe encryption algorithms (e.g., lattice-based cryptography). That way, even if someone builds a quantum beast capable of breaking RSA keys, your orbital AI traffic stays secure.

\ Put it all together and you get a self-governing, decentralized AI mesh orbiting Earth (and eventually beyond), where satellites negotiate, process, and trade resources without centralized control.

\ \

The Big Obstacles

Let’s not overhype — there are big hurdles to cross:

  • Launch Costs: Rockets aren’t cheap, even with SpaceX’s reusables.
  • Hardware Complexity: Satellites with AI chips need radiation-hardening, efficiency, and stability.
  • Spectrum Licensing: Governments tightly regulate space communication bands.
  • Coordination: DAOs are cool in theory, messy in practice. Coordinating satellite launches via token votes isn’t exactly plug-and-play.
  • Trust Bootstrapping: How do you ensure a decentralized AI satellite network isn’t hijacked or Sybil-attacked?

But hey, decentralization has always been messy. Bitcoin had its scaling wars. Ethereum had the DAO hack. Yet here we are.

\ \

Why All of It Matters…

This isn’t just about cool tech.

It’s about who controls intelligence. If the internet for AI is centralized, AI belongs to corporations and states. If it’s decentralized, AI belongs to everyone.

👍 Equity: Rural Africa gets the same AI access as Silicon Valley.

👍 Resilience: No more single-point-of-failure in wars or disasters.

👍 Freedom: No more kill-switches or censorship from governments.

👍 Innovation: Open ecosystems always outpace walled gardens.

\

\

The Sky Is Decentralized

AI is the next electricity. Yeah electricity needed a grid. For AI, that grid could be a mesh of satellites orbiting Earth, owned by the people, powering intelligence everywhere.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

NFL Coach Says Trump ‘Has No Idea What’s Going On’ With Kickoff Rule

NFL Coach Says Trump ‘Has No Idea What’s Going On’ With Kickoff Rule

The post NFL Coach Says Trump ‘Has No Idea What’s Going On’ With Kickoff Rule appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Kansas City Chiefs special teams coach Dave Toub has hit back at several critiques from President Donald Trump over a kickoff rule change in the NFL this season, saying the president “doesn’t even know what he’s looking at” and “has no idea what’s going on.” Kansas City Chiefs special teams Dave Toub on Oct. 12, 2025. Icon Sportswire via Getty Images Key Facts Trump has several times this season criticized the NFL’s “dynamic kickoff” rule, which was introduced two years ago and altered again this last off season. The dynamic kickoff, which changes player alignment and touchback rules, is meant to address player safety and increase returns, but Trump said in a Truth Social post earlier this month it “TAKES THE PAGEANTRY AND GLAMOUR AWAY FROM THE GAME.” In September he called the new rule “sissy football” that was “bad for America” and he again criticized it in a Pat McAfee Show interview last week, saying it’s “terrible,” “demeaning” and “hurts the game,” adding “I’ve told that to (NFL commissioner) Roger Goodell.” Toub, 63, hit back during a press conference Thursday by saying, “Trump doesn’t even know what he’s looking at. He has no idea what’s going on with the kickoff rule. Take that for what it’s worth. I hope he hears it.” Trump has also said several times that he doesn’t think the new rules have made the game any safer, but league data showed a 43% reduction in documented head injuries on kickoffs in the first year of the rule change. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here: joinsubtext.com/forbes. Crucial Quote “The pageantry of the game is so badly hurt,” Trump told McAfee.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/22 00:40
Only An Asteroid Can Sink MSTR’s Bitcoin Bet, CryptoQuant CEO Says

Only An Asteroid Can Sink MSTR’s Bitcoin Bet, CryptoQuant CEO Says

CryptoQuant founder and CEO Ki Young Ju pushed back on a renewed wave of forced Bitcoin liquidation and bankruptcy chatter around Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy, MSTR), arguing that the bearish thesis misreads the company’s capital structure and shareholder incentives. In a Nov. 20, 2025 post on X, Ju wrote, “MSTR only goes bankrupt if an asteroid hits Earth,” adding that critics should “bring a single piece of evidence” before claiming Michael Saylor would be liquidated. The comments came as Bitcoin and high-beta crypto proxies retraced into late November, reviving legacy narratives that Strategy’s debt stack could compel BTC sales. Why Strategy Will Never Sell Bitcoin Ju’s central claim is that Strategy is not structurally set up like a margin trader. Addressing the most common fear—that convertible notes “missing” their conversion price forces liquidation—he stated: “Convertible debt not reaching the conversion price is not liquidation. It simply means the notes get repaid in cash […] Failing to convert is not a bankruptcy trigger. It is just normal debt maturity.” Related Reading: Is The Bitcoin Bottom In? Fidelity Research Lead Weighs The Odds In his view, the repayment pathways are conventional corporate finance tools: refinancing, rolling into new notes, secured borrowing, or operating cash flow. That framing aligns with how convertibles function in practice; if equity is below strike at maturity, the embedded option expires and the instrument reverts to straight debt rather than a forced-sale event. He also grounded his argument in governance and identity. “Saylor would never sell Bitcoin unless shareholders want it,” Ju wrote, warning that “selling even a single BTC would destroy MSTR’s identity as a Bitcoin treasury company and trigger a death spiral for both Bitcoin and MSTR.” Strategy has repeatedly defined itself as a BTC-treasury vehicle, and its shareholder base largely bought into that mandate, making voluntary divestment politically and strategically improbable absent a radical shift in investor preference. Balance-sheet data underpins Ju’s confidence. Strategy reported 640,808 BTC as of Oct. 30, 2025, acquired for about $47.44 billion; subsequent filings cited major November additions taking holdings to roughly 649,870 BTC. Even after accounting for the growing convertible and preferred layers, the BTC treasury remains the dominant asset, meaning solvency stress would require an extreme, prolonged Bitcoin collapse rather than a cyclical drawdown. Related Reading: Why Bitwise Thinks Bitcoin Still Hits $200,000 In 2026 Ju did not claim the equity is risk-free. “This does not mean MSTR’s stock price will always stay high,” he wrote, but called the idea that Strategy would sell BTC to support the stock or face imminent bankruptcy “completely absurd.” He added that even at a price of $10,000 per coin, Strategy would face “a debt restructuring, nothing more.” On preferred shares, he acknowledged dividend obligations, noting payments have not been missed and can be covered via new share issuance—dilutive, but not a liquidation vector. Posting BTC as collateral, he said, would be a last resort because that would introduce real margin risk. In short, Ju’s rebuttal draws a hard line between volatility and insolvency: Strategy may trade like leveraged Bitcoin, but its liabilities do not mechanically force BTC sales. The “Saylor liquidation” narrative, he argues, is a Twitter myth unless the world ends—by asteroid. At press time, BTC traded at $82,050. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/11/22 00:00