PayPal USD debuts on TRON as a permissionless token PYUSD0, enabled by LayerZero's OFT standard and the Stargate Hydra extension.PayPal USD debuts on TRON as a permissionless token PYUSD0, enabled by LayerZero's OFT standard and the Stargate Hydra extension.

PYUSD lands on TRON: 332M accounts and $28B TVL, what changes

6 min read

PayPal USD debuts on TRON as a permissionless token PYUSD0, enabled by LayerZero’s OFT standard and the Stargate Hydra extension.

The announcement on September 18, 2025 (Geneva) introduces native interoperability between chains and transfers without manual steps for users; the news echoes elements already communicated by PayPal at the launch of PYUSD PayPal Newsroom.

The move concerns an ecosystem that includes 332 million accounts and over $28 billion in TVL. In this context, the fungibility of a stablecoin regulated across multiple networks and the use of TRON as a settlement layer for payments and remittances is at stake.

According to the data collected by TRONSCAN updated as of September 18, 2025, the network metrics confirm the cited volumes and highlighted traffic patterns.

Our editorial team has verified the transaction logs and monitored the public chain metrics to corroborate the reported figures; the observations on daily flows and TVL are consistent with the network dashboards.

Industry analysts observe that the entry of a regulated issuer like PayPal tends to increase institutional interest, provided there is transparency on reserves and compliance checks.

What is PYUSD0 on TRON and why is it relevant

PYUSD0 is the representation of PayPal USD on TRON. It is pegged one-to-one to PYUSD through the OFT standard: the two tokens remain a single stablecoin, fungible and reconciled across chains. The integration is made possible by Stargate Hydra, now operational through LayerZero.

According to the founder of TRON, Justin Sun, the extension on TRON expands access and trust for users and institutions. For Bryan Pellegrino (CEO of LayerZero Labs), stablecoins represent a pillar of global payments and remittances, as the native compatibility between chains enables their operational scalability.

It must be said that the alignment between issuer, cross-chain infrastructure, and settlement network is a key element.

Key Numbers: TRON Scale and Potential Impact

  • Over $21 trillion in cumulative transfers since the MainNet launch (May 2018)
  • 332+ million total accounts (TRONSCAN data, September 18, 2025)
  • $28+ billion in TVL in the ecosystem (TRONSCAN data, September 2025)
  • ~9 million average daily transactions
  • 2.83+ million daily active accounts
  • ~$1 billion in protocol revenue in each of the first two quarters of 2025 (data to be verified)

These volumes position TRON among the most used networks for stablecoin settlement. Indeed, the arrival of PYUSD0 introduces a globally significant issuer into a context already oriented towards the circulation of stablecoins.

How it works: OFT and Stargate Hydra, explained simply

Standard OFT: fungibility and transfers

The Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard defines rules for the transfer and reconciliation of fungible assets between networks. Thanks to OFT, PYUSD and PYUSD0 share the same economic identity: a cross-chain transfer reduces the balance on one network and credits it on the other, preserving value parity. That said, the burn/mint or lock/release logic is orchestrated at the protocol level.

Stargate Hydra: multi-chain extension

Stargate Hydra acts as an extension to bring the same asset onto multiple chains starting from a hub. Integrated with LayerZero, it allows PYUSD to arrive on TRON as PYUSD0 transparently for the user, without the need for manual wrapping or extra steps. Yet, the experience remains aligned with already known wallet flows.

What changes for the end user

Whether holding PYUSD or PYUSD0, the user interacts with the same stablecoin on different networks. The LayerZero and Stargate protocols orchestrate the conversion, maintaining balance consistency and supported destination addresses. In this way, the network changes, not the unit of account.

Concrete use cases

  • Remittances and B2C payments: fast transfers on TRON with low fees, maintaining parity in USD.
  • Treasury of exchange and PSP: allocation of liquidity across chains based on costs and congestion.
  • Cross-border B2B Payments: settlement on TRON and accounting reconciliation on preferred chains, with uniform reporting.

Risks and Limitations to Consider

  • Bridge/interop risk: vulnerabilities in messaging, oracles, or contracts can impact cross-chain flows.
  • Smart contract risk: bugs in the OFT standard contracts or in the Hydra adapters.
  • Custody/issuer risk: parity depends on reserve management and issuer compliance.
  • Congestion and variable fees: times and costs may vary based on network traffic.
  • Regulation: KYC/AML requirements or geographical restrictions may apply to certain services. For more insights on regulation, read our article How crypto taxation works in Italy: the ultimate guide.

Practical FAQ

Do I need to do anything to use PYUSD on TRON?

No. The integration is designed to be seamless: PYUSD and PYUSD0 represent the same stablecoin on different networks, with reconciliation automatically managed by the LayerZero and Stargate protocols.

Which wallets are compatible?

For TRON, wallets that manage TRC-20 tokens are supported (e.g., TronLink). For EVM chains connected via OFT, wallets like MetaMask and equivalent solutions are compatible. It is always advisable to verify the official contract before proceeding.

How long does a cross-chain transfer take?

Transfers can last from a few seconds to a few minutes, depending on the network load and the bridge parameters; in case of congestion, the times may increase.

What are the typical fees?

The fees include the network fee on each chain involved and, possibly, a service fee applied by the bridge. The amount varies depending on the gas, liquidity, and routing.

Are there limits or requirements?

Any amount limits, geographical blocks, or KYC requirements depend on the exchanges, wallets, and providers used; dedicated compliance policies apply for institutional integrations.

Comparison: TRON versus other chains

TRON is historically among the most used networks for stablecoin transfers, thanks to its high throughput and predictable costs.

With the adoption of the OFT standard, PYUSD integrates with other networks where LayerZero is already present, ensuring balance consistency and reducing fragmentation. However, the overall design remains that of a single stablecoin accessible across multiple environments.

Compared to traditional wrapping or bridge solutions, the OFT approach aims to minimize token duplication and operational complexity, while still being subject to the typical risks of interoperability.

Technical Insights

  • Verify the contract addresses on official sources before use (e.g., TRONSCAN, Etherscan).
  • Prefer bridges and interfaces that implement the OFT standard and the Hydra extension.
  • For enterprise environments, evaluate multi-level signature policies and accurate monitoring of cross-chain transactions.

Conclusion

The arrival of PYUSD0 on TRON represents an important step towards more interoperable stablecoins, with practical implications for payments, remittances, and treasury management.

Final adoption will depend on security, costs, and the quality of cross-chain integration, as well as operator demand. In this context, the capacity for settlement and the resilience of protocols will be decisive.

Market Opportunity
ONFA Token Logo
ONFA Token Price(OFT)
$0.6024
$0.6024$0.6024
+1.10%
USD
ONFA Token (OFT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Top NYC Book Publishing Companies

Top NYC Book Publishing Companies

New York City has been the epicenter of American publishing for generations, but “NYC publishing” isn’t just one lane. Today’s landscape includes two very different
Share
Techbullion2026/02/06 14:02
Sensorion Announces its Participation in the Association for Research in Otolaryngology ARO 49th Annual Midwinter Meeting

Sensorion Announces its Participation in the Association for Research in Otolaryngology ARO 49th Annual Midwinter Meeting

MONTPELLIER, France–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Regulatory News: Sensorion (FR0012596468 – ALSEN) a pioneering clinical-stage biotechnology company which specializes in the
Share
AI Journal2026/02/06 14:45
AI Crypto Trading Secrets: What They Won’t Tell You About Profits and Pitfalls|9-Figure Media

AI Crypto Trading Secrets: What They Won’t Tell You About Profits and Pitfalls|9-Figure Media

AI crypto trading is everywhere, and every YouTube guru claims their bot mints money while they sleep. Sounds dreamy, right? However, most don’t discuss the full story, the wild profits possible, and the lurking pitfalls. As someone obsessed with the intersection of artificial intelligence and digital assets, let me pull back the curtain on the realities of algorithmic trading in the crypto jungle. Here’s what nobody tells you: 87% of retail traders using automated systems lose money within their first year. The marketing materials show cherry-picked results. The testimonials come from paid affiliates. But here’s the twist. The remaining 13% who succeed aren’t just lucky. They understand something the majority misses entirely. The Reality Behind the Hype The crypto world loves success stories. You’ve probably seen them. “I made $50,000 in three months using this bot.” What they don’t mention? The $200,000 they lost by testing seventeen other systems first. Real talk: most trading algorithms fail because they’re built for perfect market conditions. Crypto markets are anything but perfect. Think about it like this. Would you trust a Formula 1 car to handle rush hour traffic? That’s essentially what most people do with their trading bots. Why Smart Money Uses Crypto AI Tools Differently Professional traders approach crypto AI tools with surgical precision. They don’t expect miracles. They expect consistent, measured results. The difference lies in understanding what these tools actually do well: • Risk management automation • Pattern recognition at scale • Emotional bias elimination • 24/7 market monitoring • Portfolio rebalancing Notice what’s missing from that list? Get-rich-quick schemes. The smartest crypto AI tools focus on protecting capital first. Profits come second. This mindset separates winners from losers. Here’s something interesting. 9-figure media companies track these patterns religiously. They know which crypto AI tools produce sustainable results versus flashy short-term gains. Professional traders using crypto AI tools typically target 15–25% annual returns. Not 500% monthly moonshots. The Startup Connection Most People Ignore AI for startups isn’t just about building the next ChatGPT. Many successful companies use AI to optimize their crypto treasury management. Smart startups integrate crypto AI tools into their financial operations early. They automate routine decisions. They reduce human error. They scale their trading operations without hiring armies of analysts. But here’s where it gets interesting. The best AI for startup applications in crypto aren’t the obvious ones. Consider automated tax reporting. Or real-time compliance monitoring. Or treasury optimization across multiple blockchains. These unsexy applications generate more consistent profits than flashy trading algorithms. AI for startups in the crypto space succeeds when it solves boring problems efficiently. Not when it promises unrealistic returns. The most successful AI for startups implementations focus on operational efficiency. They reduce costs. They minimize risks. They free up human resources for strategic decisions. Learning from Top AI Start-Ups Top AI start-ups in the crypto space share common characteristics. They prioritize transparency over marketing hype. Look at successful top AI start-ups like Chainalysis or Elliptic. They don’t promise easy money. They provide essential infrastructure. The best top AI start-ups focus on solving real problems: • Market data analysis • Security monitoring • Regulatory compliance • Portfolio analytics • Risk assessment These top AI start-ups understand something crucial. Sustainable businesses solve actual problems. They don’t just ride hype cycles. 9-figure media outlets consistently highlight these fundamental companies. They ignore the noise. They focus on substance. Many top AI start-ups actually discourage retail trading. They know the odds. They’ve seen the casualties. Instead, successful top AI start-ups build tools for institutions. Banks. Hedge funds. Companies with proper risk management systems. The Hidden Costs Nobody Discusses Using crypto AI tools costs more than subscription fees. Much more. First, there’s the learning curve. Most people spend months figuring out proper settings. During this time, they’re paying tuition to the market. Second, there’s infrastructure. Reliable crypto AI tools require stable internet, backup systems, and proper security measures. Third, there’s opportunity cost. Time spent tweaking algorithms could be spent learning fundamental analysis. The real cost? Most people using crypto AI tools trade more frequently. Increased trading usually means increased losses. Think about 9-figure media companies again. They understand that technology amplifies existing skills. It doesn’t replace them. Smart Implementation Strategies Successful crypto AI tools users follow specific patterns: • Start with paper trading • Use position sizing rules • Set strict stop losses • Monitor performance weekly • Adjust strategies quarterly They treat crypto AI tools like any other business tool. With respect. With caution. With realistic expectations, startup applications work similarly. They augment human decision-making. They don’t replace it. The most successful AI for startups implementations in crypto involve human oversight at every level. Algorithms suggest. Humans decide. What Actually Works Here’s what separates successful crypto AI tools users from everyone else: They focus on consistency over home runs. They understand that small, regular gains compound better than occasional big wins followed by devastating losses. They apply AI principles to their approach for startups. They iterate quickly. They fail fast. They learn constantly. They study top AI start-ups for inspiration. But they don’t try to replicate their exact strategies. Most importantly, they never risk money they can’t afford to lose. The crypto market will humble anyone. AI doesn’t change this fundamental truth. Your success with crypto AI tools depends more on your discipline than the sophistication of your algorithms. Remember: the house always has an edge. Your job is to find where that edge doesn’t apply. That’s the secret they won’t tell you. AI Crypto Trading Secrets: What They Won’t Tell You About Profits and Pitfalls|9-Figure Media was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 23:20