The post Which Asset Will Lead by the End of Q1? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold and silver rallied to record levels in early 2026 before significant The post Which Asset Will Lead by the End of Q1? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold and silver rallied to record levels in early 2026 before significant

Which Asset Will Lead by the End of Q1?

  • Gold and silver rallied to record levels in early 2026 before significant pullbacks.
  • Bitcoin trades near $82,000 after daily and monthly declines.
  • Leadership by quarter-end depends on macro signals, risk appetite, and rotation trends.

Gold, silver, and Bitcoin are posting divergent price moves in Q1 2026 amid shifting macroeconomic conditions. Recent gains in precious metals and Bitcoin’s weakness highlight changing investor positioning. Policy signals, liquidity trends, and market flows are expected to determine asset leadership by quarter-end.

Bitcoin Slips Amid Risk-Off Sentiment

Source: TradingView

Bitcoin is trading at $82,078, down 6.9% over the past day and 7.1% over the past month, according to market data. The decline, roughly 35% below its all-time high above $126,000 set in October, reflects weaker risk appetite and reduced speculative activity across digital asset markets.

Despite the pullback, macro conditions remain broadly supportive for Bitcoin. The Federal Reserve cut rates three times last year, bringing the benchmark rate to 3.50%–3.75%, with markets pricing in further easing later in 2026. Global liquidity measures such as M2 remain elevated, a trend that has historically supported risk assets, including Bitcoin.

Still, institutional demand has softened. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of $4.57 billion in November and December 2025, the largest since launch. Annual net inflows also fell 39% year-over-year, from $35.2 billion to $21.4 billion. Notably, the ETFs saw $817 million in outflows yesterday alone, as Bitcoin traded at its two-month low.

The decline follows a period of price consolidation earlier in the month. Analysts at Glassnode noted slowing on-chain activity, with lower transaction volumes and declining participation from short-term holders. Exchange inflows rose during the sell-off, signaling profit-taking and risk reduction by traders.

Even so, Bitcoin remains above the key psychological $80,000 level. Analysts at CoinShares said macro liquidity conditions remain supportive over the medium term, though near-term price action will likely depend on investor sentiment and broader equity market trends.

Separately, analyst Benjamin Cowen said Bitcoin is likely to continue underperforming relative to equities, adding that expectations of a “massive rotation” from precious metals into crypto may be premature.

Gold Retreats After Strong January Gains

Source: TradingView 

Gold is trading at $5,171.12 per ounce, down 3.89%, over the past day, following profit-taking after strong gains.

Despite the daily decline, gold remains up 24.68% for the month—an increase of $1,065.07 since the start of January. Central bank purchases and safe-haven demand supported prices throughout the month, particularly amid persistent geopolitical risks and inflation concerns.

Analysts at UBS said gold’s January performance reflects continued diversification by reserve managers and institutional investors. However, they warned that short-term corrections remain likely after such rapid appreciation. Still, gold’s resilience has kept it among the top-performing assets in Q1 so far.

Silver Volatility Reflects Mixed Demand Signals

Source: TradingView

Silver traded at $107.83, down $6.67, or 5.83%, over the past day. The decline followed a sharp rally earlier in the month, during which silver gained 51.95%, or $39.61, over the past 30 days.

Silver’s price action reflects its dual role as both a precious metal and an industrial commodity. Analysts at Citi said expectations of stronger demand from manufacturing and clean energy sectors fueled recent gains, while rapid profit-taking triggered the latest pullback. They predicted silver could reach $150 per ounce, citing Chinese demand and other structural drivers.

Compared with gold, silver has exhibited significantly higher volatility throughout January. While daily losses have been steeper, silver’s monthly performance remains the strongest among the three assets. Ole Hansen of Saxo Bank cautioned that rising gold and silver prices are entering a higher-risk phase, with increased volatility beginning to erode market liquidity.

Which Asset Leads as Q1 Progresses?

Comparing asset performance in Q1 reveals distinct leadership patterns. Gold and silver posted early gains driven by safe-haven demand, inflation concerns, and central bank buying, though sharp advances have led to profit-taking and short-term pullbacks.

Bitcoin, by contrast, has declined amid risk-off sentiment and weaker institutional flows. On-chain indicators such as MVRV-Z and NUPL currently point to neutral sentiment rather than extreme fear or optimism.

Looking ahead, asset leadership by the end of the quarter will likely hinge on policy signals, investor rotation, and incoming economic data. Additional rate cuts could support risk assets like Bitcoin, while sustained inflation and growth concerns may continue to favor gold and silver.

Notably, Milk Road highlighted a historical pattern in which Bitcoin tends to follow gold’s price movements with a roughly six-month lag. According to the analysis, Bitcoin’s recent sideways trading amid gold’s rally may reflect timing rather than structural underperformance. 

However, analyst Charlie Morris Edwards warned that gold and silver’s 18-month rally could continue, cautioning against premature capital rotation into Bitcoin.

Related: Why Gold’s Boom May Not Signal the End for Bitcoin

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/gold-vs-silver-vs-bitcoin-which-asset-will-lead-by-the-end-of-q1/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

The post Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold surged over the $5,500-per-ounce milestone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 01:48
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40