The post Stablecoin Rewards Become the New Battleground appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fintech A quiet policy battle is unfolding behind the scenes in WashingtonThe post Stablecoin Rewards Become the New Battleground appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fintech A quiet policy battle is unfolding behind the scenes in Washington

Stablecoin Rewards Become the New Battleground

Fintech

A quiet policy battle is unfolding behind the scenes in Washington, and this time crypto companies are moving first.

More than 125 firms have coordinated a response to what they see as an attempt by the banking industry to curtail one of stablecoins’ most attractive features: customer rewards.

Key Takeaways
  • More than 125 crypto companies are pushing back against banking efforts to restrict stablecoin reward programs.
  • The industry says the GENIUS Act intentionally allows platforms – not issuers – to offer rewards.
  • Crypto firms argue the dispute is about competition, not consumer safety, as banks move closer to issuing stablecoins. 

In a joint letter delivered to Congress, a broad coalition of crypto companies warned lawmakers against revisiting provisions of the GENIUS Act that govern stablecoin rewards. The group argues that recent lobbying by traditional banks is aimed at narrowing the law in a way that would weaken competition and entrench incumbent financial institutions.

Tyler Winklevoss, co-founder of Gemini, framed the effort as an attempt to reopen an issue lawmakers already resolved. In his view, banks are seeking regulatory changes not to improve safety, but to limit how crypto platforms compete for users.

How the Law Was Designed to Work

The GENIUS Act deliberately separates stablecoin issuers from platforms that distribute them. Issuers are prohibited from paying interest, a restriction meant to avoid bank-like risk. Platforms, on the other hand, are allowed to offer rewards using their own revenue streams.

According to the crypto coalition, this structure was not accidental. It was crafted to protect the financial system while still allowing innovation at the platform level. The group compares stablecoin rewards to familiar payment incentives, such as credit card cash-back programs, which exist without banks paying interest on deposits.

Banks Push Back as Stablecoins Go Mainstream

Banking groups now argue that rewards offered by platforms should be restricted just like issuer-paid interest, claiming both pose similar risks. Crypto firms reject that comparison, saying it blurs the distinction between who issues money and who builds consumer-facing products on top of it.

The dispute comes at a sensitive moment. U.S. banks are increasingly signaling interest in launching their own stablecoins, raising concerns among crypto firms that regulatory pressure is being used as a competitive tool rather than a safety measure.

Why Rewards Matter to Users

The coalition’s letter highlights a practical reality for consumers. Traditional checking and savings accounts offer minimal returns, while stablecoin reward programs often provide meaningfully higher yields. Removing those incentives, the group argues, would make digital dollars less attractive just as adoption is accelerating.

Major exchanges including Coinbase and Kraken have joined Gemini in backing the letter, which was organized by the Blockchain Association and sent to leaders of the Senate Banking Committee.

A Competition Fight Disguised as Risk Management

Crypto firms insist the debate is not about consumer protection. From their perspective, limiting platform rewards would concentrate power among a handful of large banks while squeezing smaller fintech and crypto players out of the market.

They also point out the inconsistency: banks themselves offer rewards through cards and payment programs without regulatory backlash. That, the coalition argues, exposes the real issue – fear of competition rather than financial instability.

What’s at Stake for Crypto Regulation

Reopening the GENIUS Act, the letter warns, would inject uncertainty into a space that depends heavily on clear rules. Regulatory ambiguity could slow innovation, deter investment, and delay stablecoin adoption at a critical stage.

The standoff highlights a broader tension shaping U.S. crypto policy. With market structure legislation already struggling to gain bipartisan momentum, stablecoin rewards have become a flashpoint between legacy finance and digital-native firms.

For now, the banking industry has not formally responded. But the crypto sector’s message is unmistakable: stablecoin rewards are a deliberate part of the regulatory framework – and the industry is prepared to fight to keep them that way.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Alex is an experienced financial journalist and cryptocurrency enthusiast. With over 8 years of experience covering the crypto, blockchain, and fintech industries, he is well-versed in the complex and ever-evolving world of digital assets. His insightful and thought-provoking articles provide readers with a clear picture of the latest developments and trends in the market. His approach allows him to break down complex ideas into accessible and in-depth content. Follow his publications to stay up to date with the most important trends and topics.

Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/banks-vs-crypto-stablecoin-rewards-become-the-new-battleground/

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.002892
$0.002892$0.002892
-1.33%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10