New data reveals a disconnect between states’ interest in sending money abroad and the actual per capita remittance flows. Buena Park, California, December 16, New data reveals a disconnect between states’ interest in sending money abroad and the actual per capita remittance flows. Buena Park, California, December 16,

New Data Ranks the Nation’s Leading Remittance-Sending States

New data reveals a disconnect between states’ interest in sending money abroad and the actual per capita remittance flows.

Buena Park, California, December 16, 2025 – Remittances from the United States are a large and stable source of international financial flows. Long-standing ties with markets such as Mexico, India, and the Philippines drive much of this activity and continue to shape cross-border capital flows and economic relationships worldwide.

With this context in mind, Ria Money Transfer has published a new study evaluating state-level remittance behavior, highlighting discrepancies between projected interest and real transactions per capita.

Leading states and key corridors

According to the analysis, California, New York, and Texas top the list in terms of total money sent abroad from the United States. However, when looking at per-capita activity, the dynamics change: the District of Columbia, Rhode Island, New Jersey, and Maryland emerge as some of the territories with the highest intensity of transfers per resident.

The study also highlights the most representative corridors between states and destinations, as well as reverse flows:

  • California → Mexico
  • New York → Colombia
  • Colombia → Florida
  • India → Texas

These routes, which serve as true backbones of the international money-transfer system, reflect decades of migration history and family networks that remain active today.

A divergence between online interest and real flows

Beyond volumes and major corridors, the study also compares users’ online search interest with real transfer activity per capita, uncovering a surprising disconnect in how people engage with key money transfers destinations.

The findings in this recent study reveal an unexpected pattern. When it comes to the most-searched destinations (Mexico, India, and the Philippines), the states leading online interest are not always the ones driving real per capita transactions.

  • Mexico: New Mexico leads in online searches; Wyoming leads in transfers per capita.
  • India: New Jersey and New York show the most digital activity; Arkansas leads in real transfers relative to its population.
  • Philippines: Hawaii records the highest interest; Alaska stands out in proportional transfers.

This contrast reveals the “wallet reality”; the gap between digital intention and real economic behavior.

To explore the full ranking of states that show the strongest interest in sending money abroad versus those that actually lead in per capita transactions, see detailed State-to-Country and Country-to-State corridors, and learn more about the trends shaping the US money-transfer market, you can access and read Ria Money Transfer’s full study HERE, including all research sources.

About Ria Money Transfer

Ria Money Transfer is one of the world’s leading money transfer companies. With a presence in more than 190 countries and an extensive network of agents and locations, Ria Money Transfer provides fast, secure, and affordable solutions for sending and receiving money internationally.

Summary:

Ria Money Transfer’s new study reveals a gap between states’ online interest in sending money abroad and actual per-capita remittance behavior. While California, New York, and Texas lead in total volumes, smaller regions like Washington, D.C., Rhode Island, and New Jersey top per-capita transfers. Key corridors reflect migration ties, and comparisons show that search interest often does not match real transaction intensity across destinations such as Mexico, India, and the Philippines.

Comments
Market Opportunity
STABLE Logo
STABLE Price(STABLE)
$0.01154
$0.01154$0.01154
+5.87%
USD
STABLE (STABLE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21