The Shiba Inu ecosystem’s long-running tension between “official messaging” and meme-coin marketing resurfaced this week after Oscar (@oscar_shibainu) publishedThe Shiba Inu ecosystem’s long-running tension between “official messaging” and meme-coin marketing resurfaced this week after Oscar (@oscar_shibainu) published

Shiba Inu Project Calls Out SHIB X Account Over ‘Personal Financial Interests’

The Shiba Inu ecosystem’s long-running tension between “official messaging” and meme-coin marketing resurfaced this week after Oscar (@oscar_shibainu) published a public break with the @Shibtoken X account, accusing it of drifting into promotional behavior that benefits individuals rather than the broader SHIB community.

In a statement posted on X, Oscar said it had previously defended the Shiba Inu account “in good faith,” but now considers that effort misplaced.

OSCAR Blasts Shiba Inu Account

“For a long time, we believed that something positive could emerge from the SHIB account,” the Oscar team wrote. “We defended it in good faith, even at a high personal cost, trusting that past mistakes had been left behind and that something constructive could flow from that platform. Unfortunately, we were wrong. Nothing changed. For that, we sincerely apologize.”

The group then drew a hard line: “The OSCAR community — the same community that has consistently stood up for SHIB and, in many cases, personally financed initiatives to defend both SHIB and this specific account — no longer supports this account,” the statement said. “It does not represent Ryoshi’s vision, it is not aligned with the interests of the SHIB Army, and it has become a stage for personal financial interests. This is not SHIB. It never was.”

The immediate catalyst was a Dec. 17 post from the official @Shibtoken account amplifying a separate token, Hachiko (HACHI), with messaging that some Shiba Inu holders interpreted as promotional. The post read: “$HACHI X95 🤝 $SHIB 0X95,” referencing a superficial similarity between contract/address prefixes highlighted by the Hachiko account: “Only $HACHI contract created on November 2nd: … Starting X95 … $SHIB starts 0x95.”

@Shibtoken included a disclaimer underneath: “Friendly heads-up: This post is from a partner project, not an official Shib token. Always DYOR, frens.”

Even with that caveat, the reaction in the comment section was sharply negative, with several users arguing the account has increasingly functioned as a marketing channel rather than a source of official ecosystem updates.

“Very irritating to the Shib community,” one user wrote. “The reason I followed @shibtoken account many years ago because it stated it was the official account. I would be able to get official updates. Now it appears that it is marketing other projects. (for a while) Go back to your roots.”

Another commenter urged holders to ignore promoted projects altogether: “I encourage all #SHIBARMY to don’t buy anything that the @Shibtoken account promotes. Just give up on that account.”

Oscar’s statement attempted to separate the dispute from Shibarium-related efforts, saying it will continue building support infrastructure while distancing itself from the main account’s messaging strategy.

“That said, we want to make it clear that we will continue to support Shibarium through our charity portal, as we have done since day one,” the Oscar team wrote. “The SHIB community will always be welcome within our ecosystem. However, the time has come for us to follow our own path and focus on the interests and values of our own community.”

At press time, there was no visible public response from the official @Shibtoken account addressing the allegations, and no reaction from any Shiba Inu developer or marketing lead. SHIB traded at $0.00000726.

Shiba Inu price chart
Market Opportunity
BitShiba Logo
BitShiba Price(SHIBA)
$0,000000000394
$0,000000000394$0,000000000394
-3,45%
USD
BitShiba (SHIBA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21