MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]

Meat importers seek expansion of pork MAV to allow new entrants

MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade.

In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric tons (MT) limits opportunities for new entrants and fails to reflect current market needs.

According to MITA, pre-MAV, pork production in 1994 was roughly 1 million MT (MMT) and peaked at 1.9 MMT in 2019. Following the African Swine Fever (ASF) outbreak, production reverted to 1994 levels despite an almost doubling of the Philippine population.

MITA said the hog industry’s recovery will take years and that the proposed reallocation, particularly the portion earmarked for state-owned enterprises, which already import duty-free, will not increase total supply.

The MAV is a commitment to the World Trade Organization to allow certain quantities of goods for import. Shipments within the MAV quota are charged a most favored nation tariff, while volumes beyond that pay higher rates.

Pork shipments within the MAV quota are subject to a 15% tariff, while volumes exceeding the MAV are charged the regular 25% rate.

Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel, Jr. has said that the department will review MAV rules after finding that only a handful of importers cornered a significant portion of the quota. MITA said the DA’s proposed rules would allocate 50% of import quotas to processors, 30% to state-owned enterprises, and 20% to other sectors. 

MITA noted that the problem lies not with the existing allocation scheme but with the overall MAV available for importers.

“Those without quota often argue that the system is unfair to them… The challenge arises when new entrants seek to participate but available volumes are insufficient,” MITA President Emeritus Jesus C. Cham said in the letter.

The DA said it intends to maintain the total MAV under the new scheme as increased volumes would hurt the already-low farmgate prices of hog.

“Right now, we can’t raise the MAV because of the low farmgate price. It’s not the right time,” Mr. Tiu Laurel has told reporters.

In November, the DA froze applications for MAV quotas while the new policy was being worked out. MITA said the DA told it that the allocations will be finalized in January.

“The abruptness of this announcement caught licensees entirely by surprise. Orders have already been placed and buying decisions finalized. These sudden shifts have created substantial uncertainty, as imports may now fall under out-quota rates, significantly affecting landed cost and contractual commitments,” Mr. Cham said.

Earlier this year, MITA said it recommended increasing the pork MAV by 500,000 MT to offset the 900,000-MT production lost due to the ASF outbreak. The MAV Advisory Council later proposed an initial MAV Plus of 250,000 MT until 2028. Neither recommendation has been implemented.

MITA urged the government to retain the current MAV Guidelines and activate the MAV Plus mechanism for both pork and poultry, prioritizing existing licensees while designating part of the volume for first-come-first-served allocation.

The group also recommended referring the matter to the MAV Advisory Council, which they said has historically represented all stakeholders. — Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

Market Opportunity
Talisman Logo
Talisman Price(SEEK)
$0.1017
$0.1017$0.1017
-0.29%
USD
Talisman (SEEK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

The post Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin recently sold small
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 05:14