A formal inquiry has been initiated by UK legislators into the expansion of stablecoins as regulators consider that the rapid adoption of these digital currenciesA formal inquiry has been initiated by UK legislators into the expansion of stablecoins as regulators consider that the rapid adoption of these digital currencies

UK Lawmakers Probe Stablecoins as Bank of England Warns of Deposit Drain Risk

A formal inquiry has been initiated by UK legislators into the expansion of stablecoins as regulators consider that the rapid adoption of these digital currencies would shift bank deposits and disrupt credit provision.

The House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee said in a January 29 statement that the investigation will determine the development of stablecoins in the UK and whether the proposed regulations by both the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority strike a balance between innovation and financial stability.

Source: committees.parliament.uk

The committee is also seeking written submissions of evidence by industry participants, experts, and the general populace until March 11, with oral evidence hearings to come after.

Stablecoins Under Review as UK Weighs Financial Stability Risks

The investigation will focus on sterling-denominated as well as currency-driven stablecoins, especially the U.S. dollar, which currently dominates stablecoin usage in the UK.

Lawmakers indicated that they were interested in knowing how the market had changed since the first stablecoins were introduced over a decade ago, how the UK would compare to the U.S. and the European Union, and what role the stablecoins would have in payments, savings, and financial markets in the future.

Baroness Noakes, the chair of the committee, added that the review will determine whether the proposals advanced by the Bank of England and the FCA will be considered as a series of proportionate and measured responses to the sector development issues.

The committee will also consider whether the development of stablecoins may be a challenge to the legislative objectives of UK regulators, such as financial stability, consumer protection, competition, and international competitiveness of the country as a financial center.

The parliamentary initiative follows as the Bank of England hastens the development of a specific regime of so-called systemic stablecoins, which are pound-denominated tokens used on a large scale either in payments or in settlement, which may have systemic risks.

Regulation of the stablecoins will become a key focus of the central bank in 2026, the policy work on tokenized collateral and the extension of its Digital Securities Sandbox, the central bank said.

Bank of England Moves Toward Stablecoin Rules by Year-End

Speaking at the Tokenisation Summit this week, Sasha Mills, the Bank of England’s executive director for financial market infrastructure, said the central bank is working jointly with the FCA to finalize a framework for systemic stablecoins by the end of the year.

Under the proposal, systemic issuers would hold deposit accounts at the Bank of England and could have access to a liquidity facility as a backstop.

Reserves would be backed by a mix of 60% short-term UK government bonds and 40% deposits at the central bank, with temporary holding limits under consideration.

Mills said stablecoins have the potential to modernize retail and wholesale payments by making transactions faster and cheaper, but warned that growing adoption could also reduce bank deposits and, in turn, the amount of credit available to households and businesses.

The Bank of England has repeatedly pointed out the risk that large and rapid shifts from bank accounts into digital tokens could amplify stress during periods of financial instability.

Those concerns echo comments made earlier this month by Bank of England deputy governor Dave Ramsden, who said Britain may ultimately need to protect stablecoin holdings in a manner similar to bank deposits if such tokens become systemically important.

The debate is not limited to the UK, as Bank of America chief executive Brian Moynihan recently warned that stablecoins could pull trillions of dollars out of the U.S. banking system, particularly if issuers are allowed to offer yield on balances.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation

XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation

TLDR The XRP Ledger’s Token Escrow amendment has gained 82.35% consensus and is set for activation on February 12, 2026. This amendment allows users to escrow a
Share
Coincentral2026/01/31 01:00
ZKP’s 300x Potential Takes Center Stage as XRP Price Shifts and Algorand News Turns Cautious

ZKP’s 300x Potential Takes Center Stage as XRP Price Shifts and Algorand News Turns Cautious

ZKP takes focus as XRP price tests a macro shift and Algorand news signals caution, reshaping views on structure and the best crypto to buy.
Share
Blockchainreporter2026/01/31 01:00