The post FET Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FET Volume Tells a Low Participation Story: No Panic Selling Despite Price Drop, IndicatingThe post FET Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FET Volume Tells a Low Participation Story: No Panic Selling Despite Price Drop, Indicating

FET Technical Analysis Jan 20

FET Volume Tells a Low Participation Story: No Panic Selling Despite Price Drop, Indicating Weak Conviction. The Real Story is Hidden in the Volume.

Volume Profile and Market Participation

FET’s 24-hour volume came in at 55.08 million dollars. This figure indicates moderate participation compared to recent weekly averages – neither excessive panic selling nor strong buyer interest. While the price slipped to 0.23 dollars with a 6.42% loss, examining the volume profile shows the Value Area (high-volume price zone) concentrated in the 0.24-0.26 range. This suggests market participants have been trading around these levels recently, but the current low volume whispers that the downtrend isn’t healthy.

When conducting volume analysis, understanding market participation is critical: In a healthy downtrend, volume should increase with each new low to show conviction. Here, however, volume remains mediocre alongside the declines. This suggests retail investors are sitting on the sidelines, while big players are holding their positions. In the Volume at Price (VAP) chart, a slight volume increase is observed around the 0.2222 support level (2 strong supports in MTF on 1D and 3D timeframes), which could indicate potential accumulation as the POC (Point of Control). However, the overall profile shows a wide barrel (naked POCs) – meaning unbalanced participation and high volatility risk.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

FET’s volume patterns show accumulation signals: Volume stays low on down days, indicating weak selling pressure. Especially when testing the 0.2222 support (score 73/100), there’s a slight volume spike – like a typical ‘spring’ move, hinting that big players are scooping up cheap. In the MTF volume context with 12 strong levels (1D: 2S/2R, 3D: 2S/1R, 1W: 2S/4R), support weight dominates on the weekly timeframe. RSI has dropped to 40.26 but isn’t oversold; volume divergence comes into play here – volume decreased as price made new lows, potential bullish divergence. These patterns resemble the ‘re-accumulation’ phase in Wyckoff methodology: Quiet accumulation before the breakout.

Distribution Risks

On the other hand, distribution warnings shouldn’t be ignored. When the 0.2492 resistance (score 78/100) was rejected, volume increased slightly, showing weak hands trapped. If volume explodes on a break below 0.1920 support (score 69/100), real distribution begins – high-volume breakdown triggers panic selling from trapped longs. Despite the current 6.42% drop, volume is low, but combined with a negative MACD histogram, there’s hidden distribution risk: Big players might be reducing positions, dragging retail down.

Price-Volume Harmony

Price is in a downtrend (Supertrend bearish, below EMA20 0.26), but lacks volume confirmation. For a healthy bear move, we expect volume upticks on down candles; here, conversely, volume is higher on up moves (short-term bounces) – weak volume confirmation for bearish price action. This divergence is critical: As price collapses to 0.23, volume is below average, no conviction. Conversely, volume dry-up on support tests signals buyers preparing. As you’ll see in FET Spot Analysis, spot volume is low compared to futures – low leverage speculation, organic moves in focus. Unhealthy volume: Low-volume drops signal reversal, high-volume breaks signal continuation.

Big Player Activity

Big player patterns are unclear but there are clues. Long-wick candles in the volume profile (around 0.2222 on 1D) resemble iceberg orders – institutions entering in pieces. VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price) above 0.25, price staying below is bearish but volume delta (buy vs sell volume) is neutral. Over the last 3 days, negative volume delta on down moves is low – selling isn’t aggressive. This suggests institutions might be in accumulation mode, but it’s impossible to say for sure; just monitor the patterns. Futures volume is 2x spot (FET Futures Analysis for details), high leverage unwind risk – needs volume spike for big short squeeze.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at 89,472 dollars with -3.88% drop in downtrend (Supertrend bearish), pressuring altcoins like FET. If BTC supports at 88,281 / 86,637 / 84,662 break, FET could drop to 0.1920 – correlation around 0.85. If BTC resistances at 90,944 / 92,953 are surpassed, relief comes, FET tests 0.2649. BTC dominance rise crushes alts; current BTC weakness shows relative strength in FET – better participation in volume than BTC.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook is cautiously optimistic: Low volume weakens downside conviction, holding 0.2222 targets bullish 0.4028 (score 25). Breakdown targets bearish 0.0808 (score 22). Watch: Volume spike above 70M signals reversal, below 40M signals capitulation. Volume story contradicts price – smells like accumulation, but BTC-dependent. Be patient, wait for volume confirmation.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/fet-volume-analysis-january-20-2026-accumulation-or-distribution

Market Opportunity
FET Logo
FET Price(FET)
$0.2067
$0.2067$0.2067
-2.50%
USD
FET (FET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
US regulators move toward unified crypto oversight as sec project crypto gains CFTC support

US regulators move toward unified crypto oversight as sec project crypto gains CFTC support

SEC PROJECT CRYPTO signals a shift as US regulators align SEC and CFTC oversight toward clearer rules for digital assets and markets.
Share
The Cryptonomist2026/01/30 19:21
SoFi Stock Jumps as Fintech Tops $1 Billion in Quarterly Revenue for First Time

SoFi Stock Jumps as Fintech Tops $1 Billion in Quarterly Revenue for First Time

TLDR SoFi Technologies reported fourth-quarter revenue of $1.01 billion, up 37% year-over-year, marking the first time quarterly revenue exceeded $1 billion The
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/30 21:23