YZi Labs, a significant shareholder in CEA Industries, aka  BNC, has just issued a statement criticizing the company’s recent adoption of a stockholder rights planYZi Labs, a significant shareholder in CEA Industries, aka  BNC, has just issued a statement criticizing the company’s recent adoption of a stockholder rights plan

YZi Labs slams CEA Industries over ‘poison pill’ and delayed annual meeting

YZi Labs, a significant shareholder in CEA Industries, aka  BNC, has just issued a statement criticizing the company’s recent adoption of a stockholder rights plan, which it called a poison pill, and the amendment to its bylaws. 

Those measures were implemented by BNC last December in response to YZi Labs creating a stockholder group that controls around 7% of the company’s common stock and launching a consent solicitation process. 

Filings also indicate it holds warrants that could increase its ownership to as much as 34% on a diluted basis. 

YZi calls CEA Industries’ plan a poison pill

YZi Labs in the statement it shared via its official website has called CEA Industries’ actions stockholder-unfriendly, claiming it is designed to frustrate and delay the ability of stockholders to act by written consent. 

The company claims the effect of these actions is to add unnecessary constraints and procedural burdens that go beyond the requirements of Nevada law. It claims the company’s board of directors took those steps to entrench itself even though YZi had warned that any more degradation of voting rights would be frowned upon by stockholders.

“We warned the Board that it risked exposing itself to potential liability for failure to properly execute its fiduciary duties,” YZi claimed. “Despite this, the Board has shown that it prefers to restrict stockholder rights rather than acknowledge its mistakes, revealing that it knows it lacks the support of stockholders.” 

The prominent Binance-linked investment firm says other stockholders have echoed its sentiments and expressed surprise about BNC’s ill-advised strategic pivot away from BNB.

YZi expressed disappointment that the Board seems to be more focused on putting out defensive measures to entrench itself rather than meaningfully engaging in good faith with one of its largest stockholders. 

“We are closely monitoring all activities and disclosures by the Company, including any announcements related to the scheduling of the 2025 Annual Meeting, which will be a critical venue for stockholders to vote on the Board’s composition,” the statement read. 

As it stands, YZi claims BNC has already delayed its 2025 annual meeting, which was supposed to hold on its December 17 anniversary, and has urged the board to avoid engaging in any further manipulative behavior, particularly with respect to the scheduling of the 2025 annual meeting. 

YZi further claims that the board’s oversight of the company has been deficient, but that past errors do not relieve the board members of their responsibility to ensure a fair director nomination and election process, free from conflicts of interest or additional entrenchment-motivated conduct. 

The investment firm has also rejected what it called false claims from BNC that it “has never considered an alternative token for the Company’s digital asset treasury (“DAT”) strategy, nor launched competitive DAT ventures.” 

“This denial is irreconcilable with BNC CEO David Namdar’s explicit comment at a November 2025 industry conference that BNC had contemplated switching to other crypto assets, such as Solana,” YZi has said. 

It concluded its statement by claiming it looks forward to providing stockholders an opportunity to elect new board members at the 2025 Annual Meeting.

What were the poison pill amendments made by BNC?

CEA designed its “poison pill” to deter a hostile takeover and is similar to other rights plans adopted by public companies. It will trigger in the event that a person or group successfully acquires at least 15% of the company’s common stock without the board’s approval. 

Should it come into play, it will allow other shareholders to buy extra shares at a 50% discount, which dilutes the acquirer’s stake, ultimately making their rights void. The current ownership levels, including YZi group’s, are reportedly grandfathered in. However, if there is any increase in their shares following the adoption of the poison pill, the plan is triggered. 

The poison pill or Rights Plan, as it is famously called, is expected to expire on December 26, 2026, or earlier, as provided in the Rights Plan. 

Aside from the poison pill, another measure BNC took was to amend and restate its bylaws to facilitate an orderly process for any future changes in control, enhancing governance and shareholder rights. 

Those amendments will require any stockholder interested in seeking action by written consent, like YZi, to first demand a record date from the company while providing detailed information on par with what is presented in Annual Meeting proposals. 

After that, all consents must be submitted within a 60-day window. 

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Market Opportunity
Bifrost Logo
Bifrost Price(BNC)
$0.06223
$0.06223$0.06223
-4.91%
USD
Bifrost (BNC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Will Huge $8.3B Bitcoin Options Expiry Trigger Another Dump?

Will Huge $8.3B Bitcoin Options Expiry Trigger Another Dump?

The post Will Huge $8.3B Bitcoin Options Expiry Trigger Another Dump? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Home » Crypto News The end of another week is here again
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/30 14:01
Why Staffing Agencies Need Hot Desk Booking Software to Scale Smarter

Why Staffing Agencies Need Hot Desk Booking Software to Scale Smarter

Your headcount doubled this year. Congratulations – you’re killing it.  But now you’re staring at a lease renewal and wondering: do you really need 40 desks when
Share
Fintechzoom2026/01/30 14:26
Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

BitcoinWorld Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with significant developments as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong recently took to Washington, D.C., advocating passionately for a clearer regulatory path. His mission? To champion the passage of a vital crypto market structure bill, specifically the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. This legislative push is not just about policy; it’s about safeguarding investor rights and fostering innovation in the digital asset space. Why a Clear Crypto Market Structure Bill is Essential Brian Armstrong’s visit underscores a growing sentiment within the crypto industry: the urgent need for regulatory clarity. Without clear guidelines, the market operates in a gray area, leaving both innovators and investors vulnerable. The proposed crypto market structure bill aims to bring much-needed definition to this dynamic sector. Armstrong explicitly stated on X that this legislation is crucial to prevent a recurrence of actions that infringe on investor rights, citing past issues with former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler. This proactive approach seeks to establish a stable and predictable environment for digital assets. Understanding the CLARITY Act: A Blueprint for Digital Assets The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act is designed to establish a robust regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. It seeks to delineate the responsibilities of key regulatory bodies, primarily the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Here are some key provisions: Clear Jurisdiction: The bill aims to specify which digital assets fall under the purview of the SEC as securities and which are considered commodities under the CFTC. Investor Protection: By defining these roles, the act intends to provide clearer rules for market participants, thereby enhancing investor protection. Exemption Conditions: A significant aspect of the bill would exempt certain cryptocurrencies from the stringent registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, provided they meet specific criteria. This could reduce regulatory burdens for legitimate projects. This comprehensive approach promises to bring structure to a rapidly evolving market. The Urgency Behind the Crypto Market Structure Bill The call for a dedicated crypto market structure bill is not new, but Armstrong’s direct engagement highlights the increasing pressure for legislative action. The lack of a clear framework has led to regulatory uncertainty, stifling innovation and sometimes leading to enforcement actions that many in the industry view as arbitrary. Passing this legislation would: Foster Innovation: Provide a clear roadmap for developers and entrepreneurs, encouraging new projects and technologies. Boost Investor Confidence: Offer greater certainty and protection for individuals investing in digital assets. Prevent Future Conflicts: Reduce the likelihood of disputes between regulatory bodies and crypto firms, creating a more harmonious ecosystem. The industry believes that a well-defined regulatory landscape is essential for the long-term health and growth of the digital economy. What a Passed Crypto Market Structure Bill Could Mean for You If the CLARITY Act or a similar crypto market structure bill passes, its impact could be profound for everyone involved in the crypto space. For investors, it could mean a more secure and transparent market. For businesses, it offers a predictable environment to build and scale. Conversely, continued regulatory ambiguity could: Stifle Growth: Drive innovation overseas and deter new entrants. Increase Risks: Leave investors exposed to unregulated practices. Create Uncertainty: Lead to ongoing legal battles and market instability. The stakes are incredibly high, making the advocacy efforts of leaders like Brian Armstrong all the more critical. The push for a clear crypto market structure bill is a pivotal moment for the digital asset industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s efforts in Washington, D.C., reflect a widespread desire for regulatory clarity that protects investors, fosters innovation, and ensures the long-term viability of cryptocurrencies. The CLARITY Act offers a potential blueprint for this future, aiming to define jurisdictional boundaries and streamline regulatory requirements. Its passage could unlock significant growth and stability, cementing the U.S. as a leader in the global digital economy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act? The CLARITY Act is a proposed crypto market structure bill aimed at establishing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. It seeks to define the roles of the SEC and CFTC and exempt certain cryptocurrencies from securities registration requirements under specific conditions. Why is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong advocating for this bill? Brian Armstrong is advocating for the CLARITY Act to bring regulatory certainty to the crypto industry, protect investor rights from unclear enforcement actions, and foster innovation within the digital asset space. He believes it’s crucial for the industry’s sustainable growth. How would this bill impact crypto investors? For crypto investors, the passage of this crypto market structure bill would mean greater clarity on which assets are regulated by whom, potentially leading to enhanced consumer protections, reduced market uncertainty, and a more stable investment environment. What are the primary roles of the SEC and CFTC concerning this bill? The bill aims to delineate the responsibilities of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) regarding digital assets. It seeks to clarify which assets fall under securities regulation and which are considered commodities, reducing jurisdictional ambiguity. What could happen if a crypto market structure bill like CLARITY Act does not pass? If a clear crypto market structure bill does not pass, the industry may continue to face regulatory uncertainty, potentially leading to stifled innovation, increased legal challenges for crypto companies, and a less secure environment for investors due to inconsistent enforcement and unclear rules. Did you find this article insightful? Share it with your network to help spread awareness about the crucial discussions shaping the future of digital assets! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto regulation and institutional adoption. This post Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 20:35