The post Strategy CEO Bitcoin Comparison: Phong Le Says Bitcoin Mirrors Early Apple and Netflix appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Phong Le says BitcoinThe post Strategy CEO Bitcoin Comparison: Phong Le Says Bitcoin Mirrors Early Apple and Netflix appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Phong Le says Bitcoin

Strategy CEO Bitcoin Comparison: Phong Le Says Bitcoin Mirrors Early Apple and Netflix

TLDR:

  • Phong Le says Bitcoin should be judged as a product, similar to early Apple, Netflix, and the internet era
  • Strategy’s 2020 Bitcoin purchase focused on long-term treasury preservation, not speculative price appreciation
  • Preferred stocks like Strike and Strife were created to access liquid capital without heavy common equity dilution
  • Dividend sustainability relies on NAV strength, with Bitcoin sales considered only if NAV falls below one

Strategy CEO Bitcoin comparisons to early Apple and Netflix framed key remarks made by Phong Le during an interview with What Bitcoin Did.

In the interview, Strategy CEO Phong Le reflected on how his understanding of Bitcoin evolved after the company’s first purchase in 2020. 

He compared Bitcoin’s early phase to formative technologies like the internet, the iPhone, and Netflix’s DVD-by-mail model. “You don’t win by forecasting returns,” Le said. “You win by recognizing a good product early.” 

He described Bitcoin as a product whose value becomes clear through usage, not conventional valuation models.

Le emphasized that Bitcoin’s long-term relevance comes from its design and global accessibility. “Great products are hard to price at the beginning,” he said, adding that intuition often precedes data. 

His remarks positioned Bitcoin as a technology-driven asset rather than a speculative trade.

Bitcoin as a Product and Corporate Reserve

Le explained that Strategy’s initial Bitcoin purchase was a conservative treasury decision, not a directional market bet. “We were looking for something better than holding cash,” he said. 

The company viewed Bitcoin as a long-term store of value rather than a short-term balance sheet trade. Tweets circulating after the interview echoed this framing, quoting Le’s focus on product quality.

He also addressed why other corporations hesitated to adopt Bitcoin. “Boards have different levels of change tolerance,” Le noted. 

He explained that many companies lacked familiarity with digital assets, leading to slower decision-making. According to Le, Bitcoin adoption often depends on governance comfort rather than market timing.

Le further stated that Bitcoin’s appeal lies in its neutrality and durability. “It works the same everywhere,” he said, referencing its global network and predictable supply.

 This consistency, he argued, aligns with how enduring products gain trust over time.

Capital Markets Strategy and Preferred Equity

The discussion then shifted to Strategy’s evolving capital structure. Le described the company’s use of convertible bonds to expand its Bitcoin holdings. 

“The convertible market looked attractive at first,” he said. Over time, liquidity constraints and hedge fund strategies changed its effectiveness.

In response, Strategy introduced preferred equity instruments such as Strike, Strife, and Stride. “These are equities that behave like bonds,” Le explained. 

He differentiated each product by risk profile, noting that Strife resembles investment-grade exposure, while Stride aligns with higher-yield demand. Quotes from this segment were widely shared across financial social media.

Dividend sustainability was another focus. Strategy’s preferred payouts total roughly $750–800 million annually.

 “Preferred stock is less dilutive than issuing common shares,” Le said, particularly when trading above net asset value. He acknowledged that selling Bitcoin to fund dividends would be considered only if NAV dropped below one.

Le also discussed accounting standards and index inclusion. He criticized legacy accounting rules for distorting quarterly earnings. 

On S&P 500 eligibility, he stated, “The decision rests with large asset managers.” He added that consistent retail support remains influential in shaping institutional outcomes.

The post Strategy CEO Bitcoin Comparison: Phong Le Says Bitcoin Mirrors Early Apple and Netflix appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/strategy-ceo-bitcoin-comparison-phong-le-says-bitcoin-mirrors-early-apple-and-netflix/

Market Opportunity
ERA Logo
ERA Price(ERA)
$0.1928
$0.1928$0.1928
-3.16%
USD
ERA (ERA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile partners with IGB Berhad for 5G indoor network deployment across 20 Malaysian properties.
Share
bitcoininfonews2025/12/21 20:20
SOL Price Prediction: Targeting $165-175 Recovery Within 6 Weeks as Technical Setup Improves

SOL Price Prediction: Targeting $165-175 Recovery Within 6 Weeks as Technical Setup Improves

The post SOL Price Prediction: Targeting $165-175 Recovery Within 6 Weeks as Technical Setup Improves appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Felix Pinkston Dec
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 19:51