South Korean authorities are investigating a recent Hyundai bomb threat that has heightened concern over digital ransom schemes targeting major conglomerates. BitcoinSouth Korean authorities are investigating a recent Hyundai bomb threat that has heightened concern over digital ransom schemes targeting major conglomerates. Bitcoin

Police investigate Hyundai bomb threat after Bitcoin ransom demand targets major Korean conglomerates

hyundai bomb threat

South Korean authorities are investigating a recent Hyundai bomb threat that has heightened concern over digital ransom schemes targeting major conglomerates.

Bitcoin-linked threat against Hyundai Group and Hyundai Motor

According to police, at around 11:42 a.m. on the 19th, a 112 call reported an email warning of an imminent attack on the Hyundai Group building in Yeonji-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and the Hyundai Motor Group tower in Yangja-dong, Seocho-gu.

The email allegedly stated that “if 13 bitcoins are not given, the Hyundai Group building will be blown up at 11:30, and then a bomb will be taken to Yangja-dong and detonated”. Moreover, the message framed the demand as a direct digital ransom tied to bitcoin payments.

Police immediately dispatched special forces and other personnel to both locations and conducted a thorough search. However, no objects suspected of being explosive devices have been found so far, and operations at the sites were gradually normalized.

Rising pattern of corporate bomb threats in South Korea

This incident comes amid a worrying rise in threats against large Korean companies. The previous day, a message posted on Kakao‘s customer service bulletin board claimed, “I will blow up Samsung Electronics’ headquarters in Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, and shoot Chairman Lee Jae-yong with a homemade gun”, directly naming Samsung Electronics and Lee Jae-yong.

On the 17th, another post appeared in KT‘s online sign-up form, asserting, “I installed a homemade bomb at KT’s Bundang building in Jeongja-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam”. That statement triggered immediate concern and prompted checks on critical infrastructure.

In addition, Kakao’s Jeju headquarters and Pangyo office, as well as Naver, have recently received similar threats.

Authorities note that, while no explosives have been confirmed in these cases, anxiety among employees and local residents has been growing.

Moreover, repeated incidents involving digital channels, from emails to online forms and bulletin boards, underline how corporate security threats are evolving alongside technology.

Police response and investigation outlook

Police have launched full-scale investigations to identify those responsible for the series of messages. In the case of the Hyundai bomb threat, digital forensics teams are expected to trace the origin of the ransom email and review surveillance footage around the targeted buildings.

Similarly, investigators are analyzing IP logs and user data connected to posts mentioning Samsung, KT, Kakao and Naver.

However, the use of anonymizing tools and overseas platforms could complicate the process and extend the timeline for arrests.

For now, law enforcement officials emphasize that every new report is treated as credible until proven otherwise, leading to repeated deployments of special units and building evacuations.

That said, the growing number of incidents is putting additional pressure on security teams at South Korea’s largest technology and industrial groups.

The latest bitcoin-linked email to Hyundai underscores a broader trend in which major firms like Hyundai, Samsung, KT, Kakao and Naver face escalating digital threats, forcing closer coordination with police and continuous upgrades to on-site and cyber security protocols.

Market Opportunity
Bombie Logo
Bombie Price(BOMB)
$0.000081
$0.000081$0.000081
+4.92%
USD
Bombie (BOMB) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00