Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail. A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply. In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic. This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI. True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy. Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party. DeAI's Trilemma Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework. Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently. Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui. This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently. Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail. A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply. In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic. This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI. True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy. Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party. DeAI's Trilemma Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework. Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently. Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui. This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently. Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.

The true holy grail of DeAI: Talus's "full-chain" solution

2025/12/09 08:00

Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail.

A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply.

In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic.

This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI.

True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain

Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy.

Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party.

DeAI's Trilemma

Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework.

Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently.

Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui.

This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently.

Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.

Market Opportunity
Camelot Token Logo
Camelot Token Price(GRAIL)
$123.69
$123.69$123.69
-1.88%
USD
Camelot Token (GRAIL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
Hedera Price Analysis Shows Persistent Bearish Pressure Near $0.112

Hedera Price Analysis Shows Persistent Bearish Pressure Near $0.112

Hedera continues to be on the wrong side of the market with price having trouble stabilizing below major resistance zones with deteriorating momentum and participation
Share
Brave Newcoin2025/12/20 03:37