The post South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s regulators are advancing plans to limit Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to bank-led consortia, requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% stakes. This framework aims to safeguard financial stability and monetary policy while issuing the Digital Asset Basic Act by early 2025. South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions. The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management. With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers. South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments. What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework? South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act. How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea? The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem… The post South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s regulators are advancing plans to limit Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to bank-led consortia, requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% stakes. This framework aims to safeguard financial stability and monetary policy while issuing the Digital Asset Basic Act by early 2025. South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions. The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management. With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers. South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments. What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework? South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act. How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea? The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem…

South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance

  • South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions.

  • The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management.

  • With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers.

South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments.

What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework?

South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act.

How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea?

The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem but limiting flexibility for non-bank players.

Data from the Bank of Korea highlights the urgency: non-bank issuers could disrupt traditional banking by mimicking narrow bank operations, issuing currency alongside payment services without full regulatory buffers. For instance, the central bank’s recent warnings emphasize that such entities might undermine financial stability, with potential impacts on the 1.2 trillion South Korean won in circulating stablecoin equivalents reported in late 2024. Expert analysts from the Korea Institute of Finance note that bank involvement could enhance trust, drawing parallels to successful models in jurisdictions like the European Union.

However, this bank-centric model raises questions about innovation. Fintech advocates argue it may stifle competition, confining stablecoins to basic transactional roles rather than enabling advanced applications in decentralized finance or cross-border remittances. The Financial Services Commission’s post-meeting statement underscores that no final decisions have been made, signaling ongoing negotiations to refine the consortium’s operational guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Key Requirements for Issuing Korean-Won-Pegged Stablecoins Under South Korea’s New Rules?

Under the proposed South Korea stablecoin regulation, issuers must form consortia with commercial banks holding over 51% of shares, ensuring robust oversight and compliance with national monetary policies. This setup prioritizes financial stability, as outlined in discussions by the Democratic Party and Financial Services Commission, preventing risks from unregulated entities.

Why Is the Bank of Korea Concerned About Non-Bank Stablecoin Issuers?

The Bank of Korea views non-bank stablecoin issuers as potential threats to monetary sovereignty and financial systems because they operate like narrow banks, issuing digital currency without traditional safeguards. This could erode deposit protections and complicate policy implementation, as highlighted in the central bank’s advisory reports from November 2024.

Key Takeaways

  • Bank-Dominated Consortia: Requiring over 51% bank ownership in stablecoin issuers to fortify regulatory control and protect the Korean won’s integrity.
  • Legislative Timeline: Government must submit a draft Digital Asset Basic Act by December 10, 2024, with potential lawmaker-led passage if delayed, targeting enactment in January 2025.
  • Balancing Act: While addressing Bank of Korea’s stability concerns, the framework may limit fintech innovation—monitor for adjustments in ongoing stakeholder dialogues.

Conclusion

South Korea’s stablecoin regulation marks a pivotal shift toward integrating digital assets under bank-led oversight, with the consortium model central to the Digital Asset Basic Act. By prioritizing financial security and addressing Bank of Korea warnings, this framework positions the nation as a leader in balanced crypto governance. As the December 10 deadline approaches, stakeholders should prepare for enhanced compliance, potentially unlocking safer innovations in the Korean-won-pegged stablecoin space—engage with evolving policies to navigate this transformative era.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/south-korea-plans-bank-led-consortia-for-korean-won-stablecoin-issuance

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.03625
$0.03625$0.03625
+0.69%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21